Skip to main content
Log in

Preference and performance of a willow-feeding leaf beetle: soil nutrient and flooding effects on host quality

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution and abundance of herbivores on plants growing under different environmental conditions may depend upon preference and/or performance. Soil nutrients and water availability are key determinants of herbivore distribution, as both influence plant growth and tissue quality. However, the effects of water on plant quality may depend upon the availability of nutrients and vice versa. Surprisingly few studies have examined the interactions between the two. We investigated the effects of soil nutrient and water availability on (1) the growth and chemistry of the silky willow (Salix sericea Marshall), and (2) the preference and performance of the imported willow leaf beetle (Plagiodera versicolora Laichartig). We conducted two common garden experiments using a similar 2×2 fully factorial design with two levels of soil nutrients (low, high) and two levels of water availability (field capacity, flooded). In the first experiment (larval performance), larval development time and pupal weight were not influenced by nutrient or water availability to the plant. This occurred despite the fact that plants in the high nutrient treatments had higher protein concentration and lower foliar concentrations of the phenolic glycoside 2′-cinnamoylsalicortin. In the second experiment (adult preference), we caged four plants (one from each treatment) and released beetles into cages. We found that plant growth and leaf protein depended upon the interaction between nutrient and water availability. Plant growth was greatest in the high nutrient-field capacity treatment and leaf protein was greatest in the high nutrient-flooded treatment. In contrast, adults settled and oviposited preferentially on the high nutrient treatment under flooded conditions, but we found no evidence of interactions between nutrients and water on preference. Thus, at least under flooded conditions nutrients affect adult preference. We also found that foliar protein was correlated positively with adult oviposition preference and per capita egg production. Our results, then, suggest that soil nutrients can influence adult preference, and that adults choose high-quality hosts (high protein) that promote egg production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argus GW (1986) The genus Salix (Salicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Syst Bot Monogr 9:1-70

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1990) Plant successional stage and insect herbivory: flea beetles on sand-dune willow. Ecology 71:598–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros HC, Zucoloto FS (1999) Performance and host preference of Ascia monuste (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). J Insect Physiol 45:7-14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behmer ST, Joern A (1993) Diet choice by a grass-feeding grasshopper based on the need for a limiting nutrient. Funct Ecol 7:522–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New York

  • Bryant JP, Clausen TP, Reichardt PB, McCarthy MC, Werner RA (1987) Effect of nitrogen fertilization upon the secondary chemistry and nutritional value of quaking aspen Populus tremuloides Michx. leaves for the large aspen tortrix Choristoneura conflictana Walker. Oecologia 73:513–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Jones CG (1988) Plant stress and insect performance: Cottonwood ozone and a leaf beetle. Oecologia 76:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone E, Jones CG (1999) The dynamics of carbon-nutrient balance: effects of cottonwood acclimation to short- and long-term shade on beetle feeding preferences. J Chem Ecol 25:635–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Larsson S, Olmstead KL (1990) Role of enemy-free space and plant quality in host-plant selection by willow beetles. Ecology 71:124–137

    Google Scholar 

  • English-Loeb G, Stout MJ, Duffy SS (1997) Drought stress in tomatoes: changes in plant chemistry and potential nonlinear consequences for insect herbivores. Oikos 79:456–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Estiarte M, Filella I, Serra J, Penuelas J (1994) Effects of nutrient and water stress on leaf phenolic content of peppers and susceptibility to generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Oecologia 99:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkner RE, Hunter MD (2000) What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81:1588–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon J (1984) Changes in the levels of plant secondary metabolites under water and nutrient stress. Rec Adv Phytochem 18:273–320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1995) A herbivore paradox: Why salt marsh aphids live on poor quality hosts. Am Nat 145:192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks LM, Denno RF (1993) Natural enemies and plant water relations influence the distribution of an armored scale insect. Ecology 74:1081–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (1999) Effects of light and nutrient availability on aspen: growth, phytochemistry, and insect performance. J Chem Ecol 25:1687–1714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg Y, Hommel G (1988) Step-up multiple testing procedures. Encycl Stat Sci Suppl vol 2

  • Jauset AM, Sarasua MJ, Avilla J, Albajes R (1998) The impact of nitrogen fertilization of tomato on feeding site selection and oviposition by Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Entomol Exp Appl 86:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justus KA, Mitchell BK (1996) Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Insect Behav 9:887–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolehmainen J, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Roininen H, Tahvanainen J (1995) Phenolic glucosides as feeding cues for willow-feeding leaf beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 74:235–243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E (1998) Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis. Annu Rev Entomol 43:195–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (1984) Effect of flooding on water, carbohydrate and mineral relations. In: Kozloski TT (ed) Flooding and plant growth. Academic Press, New York, pp 165–181

  • Larsson S, Wiren A, Lundgren L, Ericsson T (1986) Effects of light and nutrient stress on leaf phenolic chemistry in Salix dasyclados and susceptibility to Galerucella lineola Coleoptera. Oikos 47:205–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau DK, Fox LR (1989) Effects of experimental design and nitrogen on cabbage butterfly oviposition. Oecologia 80:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth RL (1989) Biochemical detoxication mechanism of differential tiger swallowtail tolerance to phenolic glycosides. Oecologia 81:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Lower SS (2002) The effects of soil moisture and water on the suitability of silky willow for the imported willow leaf beetle. Dissertation, Tufts University

  • Lower SS, Orians CM (2003) Soil nutrients and water availability interact to influence willow growth and chemistry but not leaf beetle performance. Entomol Exp Appl 197:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1986). Mineral nutrition of plants. Academic Press, London

  • Matsuki M, MacLean SF Jr (1994) Effects of different leaf traits on growth rates of insect herbivores on willows. Oecologia 100:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson WJ Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayew PJ (2001) Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends Ecol Evol 16:165–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah RK, Madden JL (1992) Factors affecting Ctenarytaina thysanura oviposition on Boronia megastigma terminal shoots. Entomol Exp Appl 62:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ovaska J, Keinanen M, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vapaavuori E (2000) Herbivore resistance in Betula pendula: Effect of fertilization, defoliation, and plant genotype. Ecology 81:49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Orians CM, Fritx RS, Clausen TP (1993) The gentic basis for varition in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: clonal variation and sex based differences. Biochem Syst Ecol 21:535–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orians CM (1995) Preserving leaves for chemical analyses: a comparison of methods using three willow taxa. J Chem Ecol 21:1235–1243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orians CM, Fritz RS (1996) Genetic and soil nutrient effects on the abundance of herbivores on willow. Oecologia 105:388–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians CM, Huang CH, Wild A, Dorfman KA, Zee P, Dao Minh Tam T, Fritz RS (1997) Willow hybridization differentially affects preference and performance of herbivorous beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 83:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert MP, Srivastava CP (1991) The influence of rainfall deficits on the abundance of Helicoverpa armigera and Heliothis armigera in Andhra Pradesh, India. Biol Agric Hortic 8:153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Roininen H, Tahvanainen E (1989) Host selection and larval performance of two willow-feeding sawflies. Ecology 70:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriber JM, Slansky F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol 26:183–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipura M, Tahvanainen J (2000) Shading enhances the quality of willow leaves to leaf beetles—but does it matter? Oikos 91:550–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahvanainen J, Julkunen Tiitto R, Kettunen J (1985) Phenolic glycosides govern the food selection pattern of willow-feeding leaf beetles. Oecologia 67:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Takabayashi J, Dicke M, Maarten A (1994) Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant-mite interactions: variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors. J Chem Ecol 20:1329–1354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1998) The evolution of diet breadth: monophagy and polyphagy in swallowtail butterflies. J Evol Biol 11:563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale RA, Wagner MR (1991) Host stress influences oviposition preference and performance of a pine sawfly. Ecol Entomol 16:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares G, Lawton JH (1991) Host-plant selection in the holly leaf-miner: does mother know best? J Anim Ecol 60:227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrieling K, de Boer Nico J (1999) Host-plant choice and larval growth in the cinnabar moth: do pyrrolizidine alkaloids play a role? Entomol Exp Appl 91:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wait DA, Jones CG, Coleman JS (1998) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on leaf chemistry and beetle feeding are mediated by leaf development. Oikos 82:502–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt AD (1986) The performance of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea on water-stressed lodgepole pine Pinus contorta plants a laboratory experiment. Oecologia 70:578–579

    Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63:90–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Young CE, Hall RW (1986) Factors influencing suitability of elms for elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 15:843–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996). Biostatistical analysis. Simon and Schuster, New Jersey

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Michael Reed and Durwood Marshall for statistical advice. We thank Dr. Frances Chew for assistance with cage design. The laboratory of Dr. Adrien Finzi at Boston University provided facilities and technical support for nitrogen analyses. We thank the Tufts University Department of Biology for support and facilities. We are grateful to Lisa Tewksbury (University of Rhode Island) and the Systemic Entomology Laboratory (Baltimore, Md.) for identification of Schizonotus. This work was supported by the EPA STAR Fellowship Program, the Draupner Ring Foundation, the Howard Hughes Biomedical Institute and the National Science Foundation (deb9981568). Dr. George Ellmore, Dr. Sara Lewis, Dr. Greg English-Loeb, Dr. Margret Van Vuuren, Megan Griffiths, Benjamin Babst, Brian Brannigan and two anonymous reviewers gave valuable suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin M. Orians.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lower, S.S., Kirshenbaum, S. & Orians, C.M. Preference and performance of a willow-feeding leaf beetle: soil nutrient and flooding effects on host quality. Oecologia 136, 402–411 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1278-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1278-4

Keywords

Navigation