Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 137, Issue 1, pp 62–68 | Cite as

Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

  • Darren P. CroftEmail author
  • Brett Albanese
  • Bethany J. Arrowsmith
  • Marc Botham
  • Michael Webster
  • Jens Krause
Population Ecology

Abstract

The movement strategies of birds and mammals are often closely linked to their mating system, but few studies have examined the relationship between mating systems and movement in fishes. We examined the movement patterns of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) in the Arima river of Trinidad and predicted that sexual asymmetry in reproductive investment would result in male-biased movement. Since male guppies maximize their reproductive success by mating with as many different females as possible, there should be strong selection for males to move in search of mates. In agreement with our prediction, the percentage of fish that emigrated from release pools was higher for males than females (27.3% vs. 6.9%, respectively). Sex ratio was highly variable among pools and may influence a male's decision to emigrate or continue moving. We also detected a positive relationship between body length and the probability of emigration for males and a significant bias for upstream movement by males. Among the few females that did emigrate, a positive correlation was observed between body length and distance moved. Sex-biased movement appears to be related to mating systems in fishes, but the evidence is very limited. Given the implications for ecology, evolution, and conservation, future studies should explicitly address the influence of sex and mating systems on movement patterns.

Keywords

Total length Dispersal Emigration Mating systems Population structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

D. P. C. was supported by a Frank Parkinson Scholarship from the University of Leeds. We would also like to thank James Gilliam and the Asa Wright Nature Centre for access to equipment and laboratory space, Anne Magurran for valuable discussions and Graeme Ruxton and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Aparicio E, De Sostoa A (1999) Pattern of movements of adult Barbus haasi in a small Mediterranean stream. J Fish Biol 55:1086–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher SA, Magurran AE (2000) Gene flow in Trinidadian guppies. J Fish Biol 56:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449Google Scholar
  4. Brown KL (1985) Demographic and genetic-characteristics of dispersal in the mosquitofish, Gambusia-Affinis (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Copeia 1985:597–612Google Scholar
  5. Chapman LJ, Kramer DL (1991) The consequences of flooding for the dispersal and fate of Poeciliid fish in an intermittent tropical stream. Oecologia 87:299–306Google Scholar
  6. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF (1995) Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) - implications for antipredator behaviour. Can J Zool 73:955–960Google Scholar
  7. Clarke AL, Saether BE, Roskaft E (1997) Sex biases in avian dispersal: a reappraisal. Oikos 79:429–438Google Scholar
  8. Congdon BC (1994) Characteristics of dispersal in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia-Holbrooki. J Fish Biol 45:943–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croft DP, Arrowsmith BJ, Bielby J, Skinner K, White E, Couzin ID, Magurran AE, Ramnarine I, Krause J (2003) Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Oikos 100:429–438Google Scholar
  10. Farr JA (1977) Male rarity of novelty, female choice behaviour, and sexual selection in the guppy Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31:162–168Google Scholar
  11. Gandolfi G (1971) Sexual selection in relation to the social status to males in Poecilia reticulata (Teleostei: Poecilidae). Boll Zool 38:35–48Google Scholar
  12. Gandon S, Michalakis Y (2001) Multiple causes of the evolution of dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 155–167Google Scholar
  13. Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (2001) Movement in corridors: enhancement by predation threat, disturbance, and habitat structure. Ecology 82:258–273Google Scholar
  14. Gilliam JF, Fraser DF, Alkinskoo M (1993) Structure of a tropical stream fish community — a role for biotic interactions. Ecology 74:1856–1870Google Scholar
  15. Gowan C, Fausch KD (1996) Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: re-evaluating the concept of restricted movement. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1370–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997) Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 264:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997b) Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav 53:945–949Google Scholar
  19. Hansson L (1991) Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations. Biol J Linnean Soc 42:89–103Google Scholar
  20. Haskins CP, Haskins EF, McLaughlin JJA, Hewitt RE (1961) Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus, an ecological study. In: Blair WF (ed) Vertebrate speciation. University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex., pp 320–395Google Scholar
  21. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1999) Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 58:907–916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jirotkul M (1999a) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:287–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jirotkul M (1999b) Population density influences male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:1169–1175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaya CM (1991) Rheotactic differentiation between fluvial and lacustrine populations of Arctic grayling (Thymallus-Arcticus), and Implications for the only remaining indigenous population of fluvial Montana grayling. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:53–59Google Scholar
  26. Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE (1999) Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401:661–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kramer DL, Chapman MR (1999) Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function. Environ Biol Fishes 55:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krupa JJ, Sih A (1993) Experimental studies on water strider mating dynamics — spatial variation in density and sex-ratio. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:107–120Google Scholar
  29. Labbe TR, Fausch KD (2000) Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecol Appl 10:1774–1791Google Scholar
  30. Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB (2001) Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition, and kin facilitation: a review of the empirical evidence. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 110–122Google Scholar
  31. Lawrence WS (1987) Effects of sex-ratio on milkweed beetle emigration from host plant patches. Ecology 68:539–546Google Scholar
  32. Liley NR, Seghers BH (1975) Factors affecting the morphology and behaviour of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad. In: Baerands G, Manning A (eds), Function and behaviour in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–118Google Scholar
  33. Macdonald DW, Johnson DDP (2001) Dispersal in theory and practice: consequences for conservation biology. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 358–372Google Scholar
  34. Magurran AE (1996) Battle of the sexes. Nature 383:307–307Google Scholar
  35. Magurran AE (1998) Population differentiation without speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 353:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1994) Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology — evidence from guppy, Poecilia-Reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 255:31–36Google Scholar
  37. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Shaw PW, Carvalho GR (1994) Schooling preferences for familial fish in the Guppy, Poecilia-reticulata. J Fish Biol 45:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Metcalfe NB, Thomson BC (1995) Fish recognise and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:207–210Google Scholar
  39. Meyer CG, Holland KN, Wetherbee BM, Lowe CG (2000) Movement patterns, habitat utilization, home range size and site fidelity of whitesaddle goatfish, Parupeneus porphyreus, in a marine reserve. Environ Biol Fish 59:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okuda N (1999) Female mating strategy and male brood cannibalism in a sand-dwelling cardinalfish. Anim Behav 58:273–279Google Scholar
  41. Perrin N, Goudet J (2001) Inbreeding, kinship, and the evolution of natal dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 123–142Google Scholar
  42. Railsback SF, Lamberson RH, Harvey BC, Duffy WE (1999) Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecol Model 123:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reznick DN, Butler MJ, Rodd FH, Ross P (1996) Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50:1651–1660Google Scholar
  44. Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1997) Variation in the demography of guppy populations: the importance of predation and life histories. Ecology 78:405–418Google Scholar
  45. Schaefer J (2001) Riffles as barriers to interpool movement by three cyprinids (Notropis boops, Campostoma anomalum and Cyprinella venusta). Freshwater Biol 46:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schleusner CJ, Maughan OE (1999) Mobility of largemouth bass in a desert lake in Arizona. Fish Res 44:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlosser IJ, Angermeier PL (1995) Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. In: Nielsen JL (ed) Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md., pp 392–401Google Scholar
  48. Schradin C, Lamprecht J (2000) Female-biased immigration and male peace-keeping in groups of the shell-dwelling cichlid fish Neolamprologus multifasciatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seghers BH (1973) An analysis of geographic variation in the antipredator adaptations of the Guppy, Poecilia reticulata. PhD thesis. University of British Columbia, B.C.Google Scholar
  50. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim Behav 62:591–598Google Scholar
  51. Van Deventer JS, Platts WS (1983) Sampling and estimating fish populations from streams. Trans Nat Am Wild Nat Res 48:349–354Google Scholar
  52. Van Deventer JS, Platts WS (1985) A computer software system for entering, managing, and analyzing fish capture data from streams. Research note INT-352. Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  53. Winker K, Rappole JH, Ramos MA (1995) The use of movement data as an assay of habitat quality. Oecologia 101:211–216Google Scholar
  54. Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of Teleost fishes. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren P. Croft
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brett Albanese
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bethany J. Arrowsmith
    • 1
  • Marc Botham
    • 1
  • Michael Webster
    • 1
  • Jens Krause
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biology University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Georgia Department of Natural ResourcesGeorgia Natural Heritage ProgramSE Social CircleUSA

Personalised recommendations