Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-specific floral and physiological traits: implications for the maintenance of females in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common gender dimorphism in angiosperms is gynodioecy, in which hermaphrodites and females co-occur. Females are at an inherent disadvantage because they can transmit their genes only through ovule production. One mechanism by which females can compensate for the loss of male function is by producing more seeds than hermaphrodites. As such, females should: (1) increase resource uptake to support higher seed production; and (2) allocate resources saved by the loss of male function to seed production. To test this hypothesis, we measured physiological and floral traits of gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica, controlling for both environmental and genetic variation through a comparison of greenhouse-grown siblings. Pre-reproductive females had 14% higher area-based (Z=2.14; P=0.04) and 32% higher mass-based (Z=1.96; P=0.05) photosynthetic rate than hermaphrodites, suggesting that they have increased carbon acquisition by altering photosynthetic physiology. Female L. siphilitica produced flowers with 4–8% smaller corollas than hermaphrodites (all P<0.05), suggesting that females allocate resources away from floral structures used for pollinator attraction. The genetic correlation between genders for four floral and four physiological traits was significantly less than one but greater than zero, indicating that the evolution of gender dimorphism in response to sex-differential selection will be constrained. The allocation of resources saved by the loss of male function has been viewed as the most important mechanism allowing females of gynodioecious species to support higher seed production. Our data suggest that increased resource acquisition by females at pre-reproductive stages can also contribute to the maintenance of gender dimorphism in gynodioecious species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashman T-L (1994) Reproductive allocation in hermaphrodite and female plants of Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae) using four currencies. Am J Bot 81:433–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman T-L (1999) Quantitative genetics of floral traits in a gynodioecious wild strawberry Fragaria virginiana: implications for the independent evolution of female and hermaphrodite floral phenotypes. Heredity 83:733–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman T-L, Diefenderfer C (2001) Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 157:334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey MF (2002) A cost of restoration of male fertility in a gynodioecious species, Lobelia siphilitica. Evolution 56:2178–2186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1948) Corolla size in gynodioecious and gynomonecious species of flowering plants. Proc Leeds Philos Lit Soc 5:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin Yetter R (1989) The expression of male sterility in Lobelia siphilitica L. (Campanulaceae): a life history approach. PhD dissertation, Miami University, Miami, Ohio

  • Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 224:223–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SC, Barreto HJ (1997) Using a chlorophyll meter to estimate specific leaf nitrogen of tropical maize during vegetative growth. Agron J 89:557–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK, Davis R, Rush S (1995) The effect of wild radish floral morphology on pollination efficiency by four taxa of pollinators. Oecologia 104:234–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Appleton, New York

  • Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175–215

  • Delph LF (1996) Flower size dimorphism in unisexual plants. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 217–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominee B, Assouad MW, Valdeyron G (1978) Natural selection and gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Bot J Linn Soc 77:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudle DA (1999) Maintenance and consequences of females in the gynodioecious plant, Lobelia siphilitica. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind

  • Dudle DA, Mutikainen P, Delph LF (2001) Genetics of sex determination in the gynodioecious species Lobelia siphilitica: evidence from two populations. Heredity 86:265–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1992a) Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolution 46:1313–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1992b) The genetics of gender and the effects of gender on floral characters in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am J Bot 79:792–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1993) Do hermaphrodites of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae) trade off seed production to attract pollinators? Biol J Linn Soc 50:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1999) Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 123–148

  • Eckhart VM, Chapin FS (1997) Nutrient sensitivity of the cost of male function in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am J Bot 84:1092–1098

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM, Seger J (1999) Phenological and developmental costs of male sex function in hermaphroditic plants. In: Vuorisalo TO, Mutikainen PK (eds) Life history evolution in plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 195–213

  • Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 72:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Newport MEA (1987) Bumble bee behavior and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Sherry RA, Carroll AB (1999) Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 118:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouyon P, Vichot F, van Damme JMM (1991) Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am Nat 137:498–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1991a) Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45:1468–1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1991b) Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Ecology 72:1500–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1992) Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46:688–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul MLH (1988) Male sterility in higher plants. In Frankel R, Grossman M, Linsken HF, Maliga R, Riley R (eds) Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Kesseli R, Jain SK (1984) An ecological genetic study of gynodioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnanthaceae). Am J Bot 71:775–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte MM, Delph LF (1996) Sex-specific physiology and source-sink relations in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Oecologia 106:63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (1941) Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol 50:56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1975) The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutikainen P, Delph LF (1998) Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52:1572–1582

    Google Scholar 

  • Poot P (1997) Reproductive allocation and resource compensation in male-sterile and hermaphroditic plants of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). Am J Bot 84:1256-1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Poot P, Pilon J, Pons TJ (1996) Photosynthetic characteristics of leaves of male-sterile and hermaphrodite sex types of Plantago lanceolata grown under conditions of contrasting nitrogen and light availabilities. Physiol Plant 98:780–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poot P, van den Broek T, van Damme JMM, Lambers H (1997) A comparison of the vegetative growth of male-sterile and hermaphroditic lines of Plantago lanceolata in relation to N supply. New Phytol 135:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner SS, Ricklefs RE (1995) Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am J Bot 82:596–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney VK, Shukla A (1994) Male sterility in flowering plants: are plant growth substances involved? Am J Bot 81:1640–1647

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers JS, Francis DD, Vigil M, Below FE (1992) Comparison of corn leaf nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 23:2173–2187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seger J, Eckhart VM (1996) Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:833–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Shykoff JA (1988) Maintenance of gynodioecy in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae): stage-specific fecundity and viability selection. Am J Bot 75:844–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K Carlson, H McCaslin, S Gettings, A Mikulyuk, and E Twieg for their assistance in the greenhouse. S Ventis provided the drawings for Fig. 1. V Eckhart, M Johnston, and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was supported by Grinnell College's Committee for the Support of Faculty Scholarship, a National Science Foundation AIRE grant (awarded to Grinnell College), and the Grinnell College Biology Department. During the writing of this manuscript, C M Caruso was supported by a Postdoctoral Research Leave Fellowship from the American Association of University Women. H Maherali and R B Jackson were supported by the National Science Foundation and the Andrew W Mellon Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Caruso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caruso, C.M., Maherali, H. & Jackson, R.B. Gender-specific floral and physiological traits: implications for the maintenance of females in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica . Oecologia 135, 524–531 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1199-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1199-2

Keywords

Navigation