Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe

Abstract

We investigated some of the causes of ground beetle decline using atlas data from Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands, countries in which natural environments have all but disappeared. We used ordinal regression to identify characteristics that are significantly correlated with the decline of carabid beetle species over the last 50–100 years, using a stepwise selection procedure to select the optimal model according to the Akaike Information Criterion. The results showed that large-bodied carabid populations have declined more than smaller ones, possibly because of their lower reproductive output and lower powers of dispersal. Habitat specialist populations (i.e. species with small niche breadths) have also decreased more than habitat generalist populations. Species with both long- and short-winged individuals have been less prone to decline than those that are exclusively either short-winged or long-winged. Dimorphic species may survive better in highly altered environments because long-winged individuals are good at dispersing between suitable habitats and short-winged individuals are good at surviving and reproducing in these newly colonised habitats. Finally, populations of large carabids associated with coastal, woodland or riparian habitat types were less prone to decline than populations of large carabids associated with various, open or grassland habitat types. The pattern is reversed for carabid species smaller than 8 mm in size. These results are explained in the context of habitat restoration and destruction in these highly modified western European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1A, B
Fig. 2A, B
Fig. 3

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csake F (eds) Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

  2. Anonymous (2000) World resources 2000–2001: people and ecosystems. United Nations Development Programme. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  3. Assmann T (1999) The ground beetle fauna of ancient and recent woodlands in the lowlands of north-west Germany (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biodivers Conserv 8:1499–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bangsholt F (1983) Sandspringernes og Løbebillernes Udbredelse og Forekomst i Denmark ca. 1830–1981 (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae and Carabidae) (in Danish). Dansk faunistik Bibliotek 4. Scandinavian Science, Copenhagen

  5. Baur B, Schmid B (1996) Spatial and temporal patterns of genetic diversity within species. In: Gaston K (ed) Biodiversity—a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169–201

  6. Beissinger SR (2000) Ecological mechanisms of extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11688–11689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blake S, Foster GN, Eyre MD, Luff ML (1994) Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38:502–512

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brändle M, Stadler J, Brandl R (2000) Body size and host range in European Heteroptera. Ecography 23:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burel F (1989) Landscape structure effects on carabid beetles spatial patterns in western France. Landscape Ecol 2:215–226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Den Boer PJ (1970) On the significance of dispersal power for populations of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Oecologia 4:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Den Boer PJ (1986) Carabids as objects of study. In: Den Boer PJ, Luff ML, Mossakowski D, Weber F (eds) Carabid beetles. Their adaptations and dynamics. Fisher, Stuttgart, pp 539–551

  13. Den Boer PJ (1990) The survival value of dispersal in terrestrial arthropods. Biol Conserv 54:175–192

    Google Scholar 

  14. Den Boer PJ, Van Huizen THP, Den Boer-Daanje W, Aukema B, Den Bieman CFM (1980) Wing polymorphism and dimorphism in ground beetles as stages in an evolutionary process (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomol General 6:107–134

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desender K (1986) Distribution and ecology of carabid beetles in Belgium (Coleoptera, Carabidae), parts 1–4. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Documents de Travail 26:1–30, 27:1–24, 30:1–23, 34:1–48

  16. Desender K (1989) Heritability of wing development and body size in a carabid beetle, Pogonus chalceus MARSHAM, and its evolutionary significance. Oecologia 78:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  17. Desender K (2000) Flight muscle development and dispersal in the life cycle of carabid beetles: patterns and processes. Entomologie 70:13–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. Desender K, Turin H (1989) Loss of habitat and changes in the composition of the ground and tiger beetles fauna in four West European countries since 1950 (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Cicindelidae). Biol Conserv 48:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  19. Desender K, Maelfait JP, Baert L (1991) Monitoring carabid beetles in Belgian coastal dunes. Proceedings of the 4th ECE/XIII, SIEEC, Gödöllö, pp 153–158

  20. De Vries HH (1996) Metapopulation structure of Pterostichus lepidus and Olisthopus rotundatus on heathland in the Netherlands: the results from transplant experiments. Ann Zool Fenn 33:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  22. FAO (2002) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://apps.fao.org/

  23. Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London

  24. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (1995) Birds, body size and the threat of extinction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 347:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (1996) Conservation implications of geographic range size-body size relationships. Conserv Biol 10:638–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grüm L (1984) Carabid fecundity as affected by extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Oecologia 65:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haeck J (1971) The immigration and settlement of carabids in the new Ijsselmeerpolders. In: Den Boer PJ (ed) Dispersal and dispersal power of carabid beetles. Miscellaneous Papers 8. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 33–52

  28. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  29. Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hengeveld R (1985) Dynamics of Dutch beetle species during the twentieth century (Coleoptera, Carabidae). J Biogeogr 12:389–411

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hengeveld R, Haeck J (1982) The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements. J Biogeogr 9:303–316

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huk T, Kühne B (2000) Egg laying strategy and aspects of larval biology of two Carabus species (Coloeptera, Carabidae). In: Brandmayr P, Lövei G, Brandmayr TZ, Casale A, Taglianti AV (eds) Natural history and applied ecology of carabid beetles. Proceedings of the IX European Carabidologists' Meeting (26–31 July 1998, Camigliatello, Cosenza, Italy). Pensoft, Sofia, pp 161–168

  33. Huusela-Veistola E (1996) Effects of pesticide use and cultivation techniques on ground beetles (Col., Carabidae) in cereal fields. Ann Zool Fenn 33:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  34. Janzen DH (1986) The eternal external threat. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., pp 286–303

    Google Scholar 

  35. Langellotto GA, Denno RF (2001) Benefits of dispersal in patchy environments: mate location by males of a wing-dimorphic insect. Ecology 82:1870–1878

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lawton JH (1995) Population dynamic principles. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–163

  37. Lawton JH, May RM (eds) (1995) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  38. Lindroth CH (1985–86) The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 15, parts 1 and 2. Scandinavian Science, Copenhagen

  39. Lindroth CH (1992) Ground beetles (Carabidae) of Fennoscandia. A zoogeographical study, part III. Smithsonian Institute Libraries, Washington, D.C.

  40. Lövei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu Rev Entomol 41:231–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Maddison DR, Baker MD, Ober KA (1999) Phylogeny of carabid beetles as inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Syst Entomol 24:103–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

  43. McKinney ML (1997) Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:495–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Moyle B (2000) Identifying the ecological correlates of extinction-prone species: a case study of New Zealand birds. In: Ferson S, Burgman M (eds) Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 27–38

  45. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Google Scholar 

  46. Niemelä J (2001) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. Eur J Entomol 98:127–132z

    Google Scholar 

  47. Niemelä J, Spence JR (1991) Distribution and abundance of an exotic ground-beetle (Carabidae): a test of community impact. Oikos 62:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  48. Niemelä J, Spence JR (1999) Dynamics of local expansion by an introduced species: Pterostichus melanarius Ill. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Alberta, Canada. Div Distr 5:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pimm SL (1991) The Balance of Nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  50. Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pimm SL, Jones HL, Diamond J (1988) On the risk of extinction. Am Nat 132:757–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Purvis A, Hector A (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405:212–219

    Google Scholar 

  53. Purvis A, Agapow P-M, Gittleman JL, Mace GM (2000) Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 288:328–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Regan HM, Lupia R, Drinnan AN, Burgman MA (2001) The currency and tempo of extinction. Am Nat 157:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Robertson IC (1998) Flight muscle changes in male pine engraver beetles during reproduction: the effects of body size, mating status and breeding failure. Physiol Entomol 23:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  56. Roff DA (1986) The evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Evolution 40:1009–1020

    Google Scholar 

  57. Roff DA (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol Appl 60:389–421

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  59. Simberloff D (1994) The ecology of extinction. Acta Palaeontol Polon 38:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  60. Spence JR (1989) The habitat template and life history strategies of pond skaters (Heteroptera: Gerridae): reproductive potential, phenology, and wing dimorphism. Can Zool 67:2432–2447

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thiele HU (1977) Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  62. Tracy CR, George TL (1992) On the determinants of extinction. Am Nat 139:102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Turin H (1990) Checklist of the ground-beetles of the Netherlands (Coleoptera: Carabidae) (in Dutch). Entomol Ber (Amst) 50:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  64. Turin H (2000) De Nederlandse Loopkevers, Verspreiding en Oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Nederlandse Fauna 3. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  65. Turin H, Den Boer PJ (1988) Changes in the distribution of carabid beetles in the Netherlands since 1880. II. Isolation of habitats and long-term time trends in the occurrence of carabid species with different powers of dispersal (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biol Conserv 44:179–200

    Google Scholar 

  66. Turin H, Peters H (1986) Changes in the distribution of carabid beetles in the Netherlands since about 1880. I. Introduction. In: Den Boer PJ, Luff ML, Mossakowski D, Weber F (eds) Carabid beetles, their adaptations and dynamics. Fischer, New York, pp 489–495

  67. Vepsäläinen K, Spence JR (2000) Generalization in ecology and evolutionary biology: from hypothesis to paradigm. Biol Phil 15:211–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Vermeulen HJW, Szyszko J, van Dijk ThS (1997) Unoccupied habitat islands: unreachable or unsuitable? In: Cooper A, Power J (eds) Species dispersal and land use processes. IALE, Great Britain, pp 143–148

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hans Turin for making selected Dutch data sets available. Jari Niemelä, John Spence, Matti Koivula and two anonymous referees provided constructive criticism of an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Johan Kotze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotze, D.J., O'Hara, R.B. Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135, 138–148 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1174-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carabidae
  • Extinction risk
  • Western Europe
  • Body size
  • Specialisation