Abstract.
There is strong evidence that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play a crucial role during osteogenesis and bone remodelling. Their synthesis by osteoblasts has been demonstrated during osteoid degradation prior to resorption of mineralised matrix by osteoclasts and their activities are regulated by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). For this study we developed and utilised specific polyclonal antibodies to assess the presence of collagenase (MMP13), stromelysin 1 (MMP3), gelatinase A (MMP2), gelatinase B (MMP9) and TIMP-2 in both freshly isolated neonatal mouse calvariae and tissues cultured with and without bone-resorbing agents. Monensin was added towards the end of the culture period in order to promote intracellular accumulation of proteins and facilitate antigen detection. In addition, bone sections were stained for the osteoclast marker, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). In uncultured tissues the bone surfaces had isolated foci of collagenase staining, and cartilage matrix stained for gelatinase B (MMP9) and TIMP-2. Calvariae cultured for as little as 3 h with monensin revealed intracellular staining for MMPs and TIMP-2 in mesenchymal tissues, as well as in cells lining the bone plates. The addition of cytokines to stimulate bone resorption resulted in pronounced TRAP activity along bone surfaces, indicating active resorption. There was a marked upregulation of enzyme synthesis, with matrix staining for collagenase and gelatinase B observed in regions of eroded bone. Increased staining for TIMP-2 was also observed in association with increased synthesis of MMPs. The new antibodies to murine MMPs should prove valuable in future studies of matrix degradation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dew, G., Murphy, G., Stanton, H. et al. Localisation of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMP-2 in resorbing mouse bone. Cell Tissue Res 299, 385–394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004419900166
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004419900166