Abstract
We study the asymptotics of the global fluctuations for the difference between two adjacent levels in the \(\beta \)–Jacobi corners process (multilevel and general \(\beta \) extension of the classical Jacobi ensemble of random matrices). The limit is identified with the derivative of the 2d Gaussian free field. Our main tools are integral forms for the (Macdonald-type) difference operators originating from the shuffle algebra.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


References
- 1.
Anderson, G.W., Guionnet, A., Zeitouni, O.: An Introduction to Random Matrices, vol. 118. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
- 2.
Anderson, G.W.: A short proof of Selberg’s generalized beta formula. Forum Math. 3(4), 415–418 (1991)
- 3.
Bauerschmidt, R., Bourgade, P., Nikula, M., Yau, H.T.: The two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: quasi-free approximation and central limit theorem (2016). arXiv:1609.08582
- 4.
Borodin, A., Corwin, I.: Macdonald processes. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 158(1–2), 225–400 (2014). arXiv:1111.4408
- 5.
Borodin, A., Corwin, I., Gorin, V., Shakirov, S.: Observables of Macdonald processes. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 368(3), 1517–1558 (2016). arXiv:1111.4408
- 6.
Borodin, A., Gorin, V.: Lectures on integrable probability. In: Probability and Statistical Physics in St. Petersburg, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 91, pp. 155–214 (2012)
- 7.
Borodin, A., Gorin, V.: General \(\beta \)-Jacobi corners process and the Gaussian free field. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 68(10), 1774–1844 (2015). arXiv:1305.3627
- 8.
Borodin, A.: CLT for spectra of submatrices of Wigner random matrices. Mosc. Math. J. 14(1), 29–38 (2014). arXiv:1010.0898
- 9.
Bufetov, A.: Kerov’s interlacing sequences and random matrices. J. Math. Phys. 54(11), 113302 (2013). arXiv:1211.1507
- 10.
Conlon, J.G., Spencer, T.: A strong central limit theorem for a class of random surfaces. Commun. Math. Phys. 325(1), 1–15 (2014). arXiv:1105.2814
- 11.
Dixon, A.L.: Generalization of Legendre’s formula. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(1), 206–224 (1905)
- 12.
Dumitriu, I., Paquette, E.: Spectra of overlapping Wishart matrices and the Gaussian free field (2014). arXiv:1410.7268
- 13.
Dubédat, J.: SLE and the free field: partition functions and couplings. J. Am. Math. Soc. 22(4), 995–1054 (2009). arXiv:0712.3018
- 14.
Erdős, L., Schröder, D.:Fluctuations of rectangular Young diagrams of interlacing Wigner eigenvalues. Int. Math. Res. Not. rnw330 (2017). arXiv:1608.05163
- 15.
Faris, W.G.: Combinatorics and cluster expansions. Prob. Surv. 7, 157–206 (2010)
- 16.
Feigin, B., Hashizume, K., Hoshino, A., Shiraishi, J., Yanagida, S.: A commutative algebra on degenerate \(\mathbb{CP}^1\) and Macdonald polynomials. J. Math. Phys. 50(9), 095215 (2009). arXiv:0904.2291
- 17.
Fyodorov, Y., Le Doussal, P.: Moments of the position of the maximum for GUE characteristic polynomials and for log-correlated Gaussian processes. J. Stat. Phys. 164, 1–51 (2016). arXiv:1511.04258
- 18.
Forrester, P.: Log-Gases and Random Matrices. London Mathematical Society Monographs. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)
- 19.
Ganguly, S., Pal, S.: The random transposition dynamics on random regular graphs and the Gaussian free field (2014). arXiv:1409.7766
- 20.
Ivanov, V., Olshanski, G.: Kerov’s Central Limit Theorem for the Plancherel Measure on Young Diagrams, pp. 93–151. Springer, Dordrecht (2002). arXiv:math/0304010
- 21.
Johnson, T., Pal, S.: Cycles and eigenvalues of sequentially growing random regular graphs. Ann. Probab. 42(4), 1396–1437 (2014). arXiv:1203.1113
- 22.
Kerov, S.: Transition probabilities for continual Young diagrams and the Markov moment problem. Funct. Anal. Appl. 27(2), 104–117 (1993)
- 23.
Kerov, S.: Asymptotics of the separation of roots of orthogonal polynomials. St. Petersburg Math. J. 5, 925–941 (1994)
- 24.
Kerov, S.: Interlacing measures. Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 5, 35–84 (1998)
- 25.
Macdonald, I.G.: Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
- 26.
Negut, A.: Operators on symmetric polynomials (2013). arXiv:1310.3515
- 27.
Negut, A.: The shuffle algebra revisited. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2014(22), 6242–6275 (2014). arXiv:1209.3349
- 28.
Pathria, R.K.: Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1996)
- 29.
Pastur, L., Shcherbina, M.: Eigenvalue Distribution of Large Random Matrices, vol. 171. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2011)
- 30.
Peccati, G., Taqqu, M.S.: Wiener Chaos: Moments, Cumulants and Diagrams: A Survey with Computer Implementation, 1st edn. Bocconi. and Springer Series. Springer, Italia Srl (2011)
- 31.
Sheffield, S.: Gaussian free fields for mathematicians. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 139(3–4), 521–541 (2007). arXiv:math/0312099
- 32.
Sodin, S.: Fluctuations of interlacing sequences (2016). arXiv:1610.02690
- 33.
Sun, Y.: Matrix models for multilevel Heckman–Opdam and multivariate Bessel measures (2016). arXiv:1609.09096
- 34.
Szegő, G.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium Publications Colloquium Publications, 4th edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1939)
- 35.
Werner, W.: Topics on the two-dimensional Gaussian free field (2014), lecture notes. https://people.math.ethz.ch/~wewerner/GFFln.pdf
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Alexei Borodin and Alexey Bufetov for helpful discussions. We are very grateful to the two anonymous referees, whose feedback led to many important improvements in the text. VG was partially supported by the NSF Grants DMS-1407562, DMS-1664619, and by the Sloan Research Fellowship. LZ was partially supported by Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP) in Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendices
Dimension reduction identities
In this appendix we discuss integral identities, which are widely used in proofs in the main text. A special case (\(m=1\)) of the following result was communicated to the authors by Alexei Borodin, and we present our own proof here.
For any positive integer n, let \(\sigma _n\) denote the cycle \((12\cdots n)\), and let \(S^{cyc}(n)\) denote the n-element subgroup of the symmetric group spanned by \(\sigma _n\).
Theorem A.1
Let \(n\ge 2\), and \(f_1, \ldots , f_n : \mathbb {C} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\) be meromorphic with possible poles at \(\{\mathfrak {p}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {p}_m \}\). Then we have the identity
where the contours in both sides are positively oriented, enclosing \(\{\mathfrak {p}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {p}_m \}\), and for the left hand side we require \(|u_1| \ll \cdots \ll |u_n|\).
Proof
Let \(\mathfrak {C}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {C}_{2n-1}\) be closed paths around \(\{\mathfrak {p}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {p}_m \}\), and each \(\mathfrak {C}_i\) is inside \(\mathfrak {C}_{i+1}\), \(1\le i \le 2n-2\). Also, to simplify notations, set \(f_{n+t} = f_t\) and \(u_{n+t} = u_t\) for any \(1 \le t \le n-1\). Then the left hand side of (A.1) can be written as
When \(n=2\), we have
where \(\oint _{\mathfrak {C}_{3} - \mathfrak {C}_{1}}\) is a notation for the difference of integrals over \(\mathfrak {C}_3\) and \(\mathfrak {C}_1\). Further, (A.3) equals to
since as a function of \(u_1\), \(\frac{f_1(u_1) f_2(u_2)}{u_1 - u_2} \) has a single pole at \(u_2\) between \(\mathfrak {C}_{3}\) and \(\mathfrak {C}_{1}\); and the residue at this pole equals \(f_1(u_2)f_2(u_2)\). This proves the case of \(n=2\).
When \(n\ge 3\), we argue by induction and assume that Theorem A.1 is true for \(n-1\). For any \(1 \le t \le n-1\), we have that
Now we can move the contours of \(u_1, \ldots , u_t\) from \(\mathfrak {C}_{n+1}, \ldots , \mathfrak {C}_{n+t}\) to \(\mathfrak {C}_{1}, \ldots , \mathfrak {C}_{t}\), respectively. We move the contours one by one starting from \(u_1\), and each move is across \(\mathfrak {C}_{t+1}, \ldots , \mathfrak {C}_{n}\). For \(u_1 (= u_{n+1})\), the only pole between \(\mathfrak {C}_{n+1}\) and \(\mathfrak {C}_{1}\) is \(u_n\); for any \(u_i\), \(1 < i \le t\), there is no pole between \(\mathfrak {C}_{n+i}\) and \(\mathfrak {C}_{i}\). Thus we have that
Notice that (taking into account that \(u_{n+t} = u_t\))
and by the induction assumption (applied to \(f_2, \ldots , f_{n-1}, f_n f_1\)), we have that
\(\square \)
Corollary A.2
Let s be a positive integer. Let f, \(g_1, \ldots , g_s\) be meromorphic functions with possible poles at \(\{\mathfrak {p}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {p}_m \}\). Then for \(n\ge 2\),
where the contours in both sides are around all of \(\{\mathfrak {p}_1, \ldots , \mathfrak {p}_m \}\), and for the left hand side we require \(|u_1| \ll \cdots \ll |u_n|\).
Proof
Take disjoint sets \(U_1, \ldots , U_n\), with \(\bigcup _{i=1}^n U_i = \{1, \ldots , s\}\) (some of which might be empty). In Theorem A.1 we let \(f_{i} = f\prod _{j\in U_{i} } g_j\) for each \(1 \le i \le n\), and get
Summing over all \(n^s\) partitions \(U_1, \ldots , U_n\) of \(\{1, \ldots , s\}\) into n disjoint sets, we obtain (A.9). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorin, V., Zhang, L. Interlacing adjacent levels of \(\beta \)–Jacobi corners processes. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 172, 915–981 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-017-0823-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
Mathematics Subject Classification
- 33C45
- 60B20
- 60G60