Human Genetics

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 415–423 | Cite as

Biobanking and deceased persons

Review Paper


Early biomedical research focused primarily on the study of specific diseases or sets of diseases within small groups of living research participants. Accordingly, the first ethical frameworks governing biomedical research addressed short-term, limited-scope research involving living research participants. Due to recent interest in longitudinal population studies and biobanking, research is increasingly long term. This shift raises several ethical and legal issues concerning the impact of a participant’s death on research. This paper offers an overview of these issues in the context of longitudinal biobanking genetic research. Our first part outlines the legal and ethical frameworks that govern the effect of the participants’ death on consent. This will be followed by an analysis of the legal and ethical frameworks that govern the secondary use of deceased participants’ data and samples and the return of deceased participants’ individual research results to biological family members. In our second part, we will review the current literature and discuss the above mentioned issues using the bioethics “principlism” theory before concluding.


  1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beecher HK (1966) Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 274(24):1354–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callahan J (1987) On harming the dead. Ethics 97(2):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2010) Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans, 2nd edn. Government of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  5. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Elger B (2008) Consent and use of samples. In: Elger B, Capron AM (eds) Ethical issues in governing biobanks: global perspectives. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, London, pp 55–88Google Scholar
  8. Fisher J (2001) Harming and benefiting the dead. Death Stud 25(7):557–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grover D (1989) Posthumous harm. Philos Q 39(156):334–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Human Genome Organisation (HUGO) Ethics Committee (2002) Statement on human genomic database. HUGO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Human Genome Organization (HUGO) (1995) Statement on the principled conduct of genetics research. Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth 6:59–60Google Scholar
  12. Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Ethics Committee (1998) Statement on DNA sampling: control and access. HUGO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. International Military Tribunal (1949) Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, vol 2. US Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 181–182Google Scholar
  14. James DS, Leadbeatter S (1996) Confidentiality, death and the doctor. J Clin Pathol 49(1):1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levenbook BB (1984) Harming someone after his death. Ethics 94(3):407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levenbook BB (1985) Harming the dead, once again. Ethics 96(1):162–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marquis D (1985) Harming the dead. Ethics 96(1):159–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978) The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelkin D, Andrews L (1998) Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life. Am J L Med 24:261–292Google Scholar
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development (OECD) (2009) OECD guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Partridge E (1981) Posthumous interests and posthumous respect. Ethics 91(2):243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quaid KA, Jessup NM, Meslin EM (2004) Disclosure of genetic information obtained through research. Genet Test 8(3):347–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ries NM (2007) Growing up as a research subject: ethical and legal issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research. Health L J 15:1–41Google Scholar
  24. Robinson D, O’Neill D (2007) Access to health care records after death: balancing confidentiality with appropriate disclosure. JAMA 297(6):634–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tassé AM, Budin-Ljösne I, Knoppers BM, Harris J (2010) Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience. Eur J Hum Genet 18:741–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United Nations Educational Cultural Scientific Organization (UNESCO) (1997) Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations Educational Cultural Scientific Organization (UNESCO) (2005) Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations Educational Cultural Scientific Organization (UNESCO) (2008) Report of the international bioethics committee (IBC) of UNESCO on consent. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2002) Human genetic data: preliminary study of the IBC on their collection, processing, storage and use. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003) International declaration on human genetic data. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2005) Code of federal regulations title 45 public welfare part 46 protection of human subjects (45 CFR 46)Google Scholar
  32. Wicclair MR, DeVita MA (2004) Oversight of research involving the dead. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 14(2):143–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. World Health Organisation (WHO) (1998) Proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics and genetic services. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Genetic databases: assessing the benefits and the impact on human and patients rights. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. World Medical Association (WMA) (1949, amended in 1968, 1983 and 2006) The World Medical Association international code of medical ethics. 3rd WMA General Assembly, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. World Medical Association (WMA) (1964, amended in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2008) Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 18th WMA General Assembly, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  37. World Medical Association (WMA) (2002) The World Medical Association declaration on ethical considerations regarding health databases. 53rd WMA General Assembly, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations