Abstract
It has recently been claimed in this journal (Zhao et al. in Hum Genet 121:357–367, 2007) that a so-called “entropy-based” TDT test has improved power over the standard TDT test of Spielman et al. (Am J Hum Genet 52:506–516, 1993). We show that this claim is contradicted by standard statistical theory as well as by our simulation results. We show that the incorrect claim arises because of inappropriate assumptions, and also show that the entropy-based statistic has various undesirable properties.
References
Dudewicz EJ, Mishra SN (1988) Modern mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Lehmann EL (1986) Testing statistical hypotheses. Wiley, New York
Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506–516
Zhao J, Boerwinkle E, Xiong M (2005) An entropy-based statistic for genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 77:27–40
Zhao J, Boerwinkle E, Xiong M (2007) An entropy-based genome-wide transmission/disequilibrium test. Hum Genet 121:357–367
Acknowledgments
We thank Richard Spielman for many useful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ewens, W., Li, M. Comments on the entropy-based transmission/disequilibrium test. Hum Genet 123, 97–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-007-0450-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-007-0450-z