We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

Functional asymmetry of the two nucleotide binding domains in the ABC transporter Ste6

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Molecular Genetics and Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The yeast a-factor transporter Ste6 is a member of the ABC transporter family and is closely related to human MDR1. We constructed a set of 26 Ste6 mutants using a random mutagenesis approach. Cell fractionation experiments demonstrated that most of the mutants, with the notable exception of those with alterations in TM1, are transported to the plasma membrane, the presumptive site of action of Ste6. Trafficking, therefore, does not seem to be affected in most of the mutants. To identify regions in Ste6 that interact with the ABC transporter "signature motif" (LSGGQ) we screened for intragenic revertants of the LSGGQ mutant M68 (S507N). Suppressor mutations were identified in TM12 and upstream of TM6. Surprisingly, these mutations also suppressed the Walker A mutation G397D, which should be defective in ATP-binding and hydrolysis at NBD1. Photoaffinity labeling experiments with 8-azido-[α-32P]ATP showed that ATP binding at NBD2 is reduced by the suppressor mutation in TM12. The experiments further suggest that the two NBDs of Ste6 are not equivalent and affect each other's ability to bind and hydrolyze ATP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proff, C., Kölling, R. Functional asymmetry of the two nucleotide binding domains in the ABC transporter Ste6. Mol Gen Genet 264, 883–893 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000378

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000378

Navigation