Molecular Genetics and Genomics

, Volume 278, Issue 3, pp 283–293 | Cite as

Quorum-sensing based bacteriocin production is down-regulated by N-terminally truncated species of gene activators

  • Daniel Straume
  • Morten Kjos
  • Ingolf F. Nes
  • Dzung B. Diep
Original Paper


Down-regulation of quorum-sensing based pathways is an important but yet poorly understood process in bacterial gene regulation. In this study, we show that the gene regulator plnC not only acts as an activator gene in the quorum-sensing based bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus plantarum C11, but it also concurrently codes for truncated forms that were shown to repress bacteriocin production. By amino acid N-terminal sequencing and DNA sequence analysis, the truncated species of PlnC are believed to be translated from alternative start codons located in the so-called receiver domain of the regulator. To analyse the structure–function relationship of truncated species of PlnC, we performed a series of systematic truncation mutations: ten in the receiver domain, one in the hinge region and two in the C-terminal DNA-binding domain. It was revealed that any truncation mutation containing a disrupted receiver domain together with an intact DNA-binding domain displayed a repressive effect on bacteriocin production. Such a gene repression mechanism mediated by truncated regulators was also found in two other quorum-sensing based bacteriocin systems (spp in L. sakei LTH673 and NC8-pln in L. plantarum NC8), suggesting that this mode of repression might represent a common means applied by bacteria to down-regulate certain quorum-sensing based pathways.


Quorum-sensing Gene regulation Repression Three-component regulatory system Bacteriocins 



The work in this study was supported by grants from the Research Council of Norway.

Supplementary material

438_2007_251_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
(DOC 60 kb)


  1. Aukrust TW, Blom H (1992) Transformation of Lactobacillus strains used in meat and vegetable fermentations. Food Res Int 25:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aukrust TW, Brurberg MB, Nes IF (1995) Transformation of Lactobacillus by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol 47:201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachhawat P, Swapna GV, Montelione GT, Stock AM (2005) Mechanism of activation for transcription factor PhoB suggested by different modes of dimerization in the inactive and active states. Structure 13:1353–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bent CJ, Isaacs NW, Mitchell TJ, Riboldi-Tunnicliffe A (2004) Crystal structure of the response regulator 02 receiver domain, the essential YycF two-component system of Streptococcus pneumoniae in both complexed and native states. J Bacteriol 186:2872–2879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizani D, Brandelli A (2004) Influence of media and temperature on bacteriocin production by Bacillus cereus 8A during batch cultivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:158–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brurberg MB, Nes IF, Eijsink VG (1997) Pheromone-induced production of antimicrobial peptides in Lactobacillus. Mol Microbiol 26:347–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho HS et al (2000) NMR structure of activated CheY. J Mol Biol 297:543–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi EJ, Mayo SL (2006) Generation and analysis of proline mutants in protein G. Protein Eng Des Sel 19:285–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornwell GG 3rd, Sletten K, Johansson B, Westermark P (1988) Evidence that the amyloid fibril protein in senile systemic amyloidosis is derived from normal prealbumin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 154:648–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daeschel MA, McKenney MC, McDonald LC (1990) Bacteriocidal activity of Lactobacillus plantarum C11. Food Microbiol 7:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM (1996) Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3662–3667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diep DB, Havarstein LS, Nissen-Meyer J, Nes IF (1994) The gene encoding plantaricin A, a bacteriocin from Lactobacillus plantarum C11, is located on the same transcription unit as an agr-like regulatory system. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:160–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Diep DB, Havarstein LS, Nes IF (1995) A bacteriocin-like peptide induces bacteriocin synthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum C11. Mol Microbiol 18:631–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diep DB, Havarstein LS, Nes IF (1996) Characterization of the locus responsible for the bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus plantarum C11. J Bacteriol 178:4472–4483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diep DB, Axelsson L, Grefsli C, Nes IF (2000) The synthesis of the bacteriocin sakacin A is a temperature-sensitive process regulated by a pheromone peptide through a three-component regulatory system. Microbiology 146(Pt 9):2155–2160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Diep DB, Johnsborg O, Risoen PA, Nes IF (2001) Evidence for dual functionality of the operon plnABCD in the regulation of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus plantarum. Mol Microbiol 41:633–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diep DB, Myhre R, Johnsborg O, Aakra A, Nes IF (2003) Inducible bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus is regulated by differential expression of the pln operons and by two antagonizing response regulators, the activity of which is enhanced upon phosphorylation. Mol Microbiol 47:483–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eijsink VG, Brurberg MB, Middelhoven PH, Nes IF (1996) Induction of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus sake by a secreted peptide. J Bacteriol 178:2232–2237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancock LE, Perego M (2004) The Enterococcus faecalis fsr two-component system controls biofilm development through production of gelatinase. J Bacteriol 186:5629–5639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Havarstein LS, Gaustad P, Nes IF, Morrison DA (1996) Identification of the streptococcal competence-pheromone receptor. Mol Microbiol 21:863–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higuchi R (1990) Recombinant PCR. In PCR protocols. A guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego, pp 177–183Google Scholar
  22. Kleerebezem M et al. (2003) Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1990–1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kleerebezem M, Quadri LE, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM (1997) Quorum sensing by peptide pheromones and two-component signal-transduction systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 24:895–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klumpp S, Krieglstein J (2002) Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of histidine residues in proteins. Eur J Biochem 269:1067–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lange R et al. (1999) Domain organization and molecular characterization of 13 two-component systems identified by genome sequencing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Gene 237:223–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lejeune R, Callewaert R, Crabbe´ K, De Vuyst L (1997) Modelling the growth and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE 471 in batch cultivation. J Appl Microbiol 84:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maldonado A, Jimenez-Diaz R, Ruiz-Barba JL (2004) Induction of plantaricin production in Lactobacillus plantarum NC8 after coculture with specific Gram-positive bacteria is mediated by an autoinduction mechanism. J Bacteriol 186:1556–1564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsudaira P (1987) Sequence from picomole quantities of proteins electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. J Biol Chem 262:10035–10038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moretro T, Aasen IM, Storro I, Axelsson L (2000) Production of sakacin P by Lactobacillus sakei in a completely defined medium. J Appl Microbiol 88:536–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nes IF, Eijsink VGH (1999) Regulation of group II peptide bacteriocin synthesis by quorum-sensing mechanisms. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 175–192Google Scholar
  32. Nes IF, Diep DB, Havarstein LS, Brurberg MB, Eijsink V, Holo H (1996) Biosynthesis of bacteriocins in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70:113–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nikolskaya AN, Galperin MY (2002) A novel type of conserved DNA-binding domain in the transcriptional regulators of the AlgR/AgrA/LytR family. Nucleic Acids Res 30:2453–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nilsen T, Nes IF, Holo H (1998) An exported inducer peptide regulates bacteriocin production in Enterococcus faecium CTC492. J Bacteriol 180:1848–1854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Novick RP et al (1995) The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Gen Genet 248:446–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Novick RP, Muir TW (1999) Virulence gene regulation by peptides in staphylococci and other Gram-positive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Risoen PA, Johnsborg O, Diep DB, Hamoen L, Venema G, Nes IF (2001) Regulation of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus plantarum depends on a conserved promoter arrangement with consensus binding sequence. Mol Genet Genomics 265:198–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson VL, Wu T, Stock AM (2003) Structural analysis of the domain interface in DrrB, a response regulator of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily. J Bacteriol 185:4186–4194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  40. Schillinger U, Lucke FK (1989) Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1901–1906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sorvig E, Mathiesen G, Naterstad K, Eijsink VG, Axelsson L (2005) High-level, inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus plantarum using versatile expression vectors. Microbiology 151:2439–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stock JB, Ninfa AJ, Stock AM (1989) Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 53:450–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tichaczek P, Nissen-Meyer J, Nes I, Vogel R, Hammes W (1992) Characterization of the bacteriocins curvacin A from Lactobacillus curvatus LTH1174 and sakacin P from L. sake LTH673. Syst Appl Microbiol 15:460–468Google Scholar
  44. van de Guchte M, van der Vossen JM, Kok J, Venema G (1989) Construction of a lactococcal expression vector: expression of hen egg white lysozyme in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:224–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vaughan A, O' Mahony J, Eijsink VG, O' Connell-Motherway M, van Sinderen D (2004) Transcriptional analysis of bacteriocin production by malt isolate Lactobacillus sakei 5. FEMS Microbiol Lett 235:377–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watanabe K, Suzuki Y (1998) Protein thermostabilization by proline substitutions. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 4:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. West AH, Stock AM (2001) Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems. Trends Biochem Sci 26:369–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang Y, Lei Y, Khammanivong A, Herzberg MC (2004) Identification of a novel two-component system in Streptococcus gordonii V288 involved in biofilm formation. Infect Immun 72:3489–3494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Straume
    • 1
  • Morten Kjos
    • 1
  • Ingolf F. Nes
    • 1
  • Dzung B. Diep
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Microbial Gene Technology, Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food ScienceNorwegian University of Life ScienceÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations