Skip to main content
Log in

Configuration and composition of human-dominated tropical landscapes affect the prevalence and average intensity of mite and fly infestation in Phyllostomidae bats

  • Research
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conversion of natural areas into agricultural landscapes results in different mosaics of land use types, modifying biodiversity and consequently altering the patterns of ecological interactions, such as between frugivorous bats and ectoparasites. Our objectives were to investigate whether variations in the configuration and composition of human-disturbed landscapes interfere with the prevalence and average intensity of ectoparasite infestation in the frugivorous bats Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818), Carollia perspicillata (Linnaeus, 1758), and Sturnira lilium (É Geoffroy, 1810), in a region of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. We also evaluated whether there is a response in the parasite load associated with the ectoparasite group (mite or fly). We found six species of flies and three mites. The proportion of infested hosts was more affected by the landscape than the mean infestation values. Land cover diversity influenced seven of the interactions studied. Forest cover affected eight of the interactions and was associated with a reduction in the parasite load in seven of them. The increase in the proportion of edges per area of each fragment presented a different influence related to the host species. Variations in parasite load did not show any typical response related to the mite or fly group. Our study indicates that landscape configuration and composition interfere with bat-ectoparasite interactions, which may be related to interference in encounter rates between hosts (for mites and flies) and between hosts and their ectoparasites in roosts (for flies). The taxonomic identity of the interacting species suggests that the relationship with the landscape is context-dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available in the Supplementary Material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cristina Vieira and all teams of Instituto Sul-mineiro de Estudos e Conservação da Natureza for the logistic support and facilities during the field work. We thank Érica Hasui for help with the landscape mapping approach and Gustavo Graciolli for confirming the identification of Streblidae. We thank Marco Antônio Manhães for lending us some laboratory materials. We also thank all local business companies and farm owners for permission to access the studied areas.

Funding

This work was supported by the Rufford Foundation (24579–1), the Brazilian Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – Finance Code 001 PhD scholarships), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq process 304907/2019–7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RMM, RSL, WD, and RG designed the study; RMM and LCS collected the field data; RMM, RSL, and MVP performed and interpreted the statistical analyses; LFOB carried out the entire process of identifying the mites; RMM, WD, RG, and LFOB wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and contributed to substantial improvements in the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo M. Mello.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Una Ryan

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 39 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mello, R.M., Laurindo, R.S., Silva, L.C. et al. Configuration and composition of human-dominated tropical landscapes affect the prevalence and average intensity of mite and fly infestation in Phyllostomidae bats. Parasitol Res 122, 127–137 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07704-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07704-3

Keywords

Navigation