Skip to main content
Log in

Neospora caninum is not an important contributor to poor reproductive performance of primiparous ewes from southern Australia: evidence from a cross-sectional study

  • Protozoology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neospora caninum has been implicated as a sporadic cause of abortion and perinatal deaths in sheep flocks globally. However, its significance as a reproductive pathogen for sheep in Australia remains unknown. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the seroprevalence of N. caninum in Australian breeding ewes and (ii) examine if natural exposure to N. caninum is associated with poor reproductive performance of primiparous ewes in southern Australia. Thirty flocks of primiparous ewes (aged 1–2 years old at lambing) from 28 farms in three states (Western Australia, South Australia and Victoria) were monitored between mating and lamb marking. Blood samples were also collected from multiparous mature ewes (aged 3 years or older) at each farm. Seroprevalence for anti-N. caninum IgG using indirect ELISA was determined for a subset of primiparous ewes that were predominantly determined to be pregnant and subsequently failed to rear a lamb (n = 1279) and randomly selected mature multiparous ewes with unknown reproductive status (n = 558). Neopsora caninum apparent seroprevalence was 0.16% (95% confidence interval 0.03%, 0.5%) in primiparous ewes, with seropositivity identified in two ewes from farms located in South Australia and Victoria. There was no evidence of seropositivity in mature ewes with apparent seroprevalence 0% (0%, 0.45%). These findings suggest that N. caninum infection was not widespread in primiparous ewes or mature multiparous ewes on these farms, and exposure to N. caninum infection was unlikely to explain abortion and perinatal mortalities observed for primiparous ewes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participating farmers who provided access to their animals and facilities, conducted lambing rounds and collected and stored lambs for necropsy. We thank Celia Smuts, Janine Simmonds and the staff at VetPath Laboratories for their assistance with the serological testing. We thank Tom La and Nyree Philip (Murdoch University), Ryan O’Handley, Louis Lignereux and Rob Paterson (University of Adelaide), Andrew Whale, Mary McQuillan and Patrick Hannemann (Livestock Logic, Hamilton, Victoria), Sean McGrath (Millicent Veterinary Hospital), Simon Edwards and Michelle Smart (Willunga Veterinary Hospital) and Lauryn Stewart and Deb Lehmann (Kangaroo Island Veterinary Hospital) for assistance with sample collection and feedback on the study design. We thank Johann Schroder for helpful feedback on the study design and manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Meat and Livestock Australia (B.AHE.0318). Tom Clune received post-graduate scholarships from Meat and Livestock Australia and Sheep Industry Business Innovation (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia). Equipment used for this project was funded by the Murdoch University Veterinary Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: Tom Clune, Caroline Jacobson, Amy Lockwood, Serina Hancock, Andrew Thompson, Sue Beetson.

Methodology: Tom Clune, Caroline Jacobson, Sue Beetson, Ryan O’Handley.

Formal analysis and investigation: Tom Clune, Caroline Jacobson, Mieghan Bruce, Amy Lockwood, Serina Hancock, Angus Campbell, Elsa Glanville, Daniel Brooks, Colin Trengove.

Writing—original draft preparation: Tom Clune, Caroline Jacobson, Amy Lockwood.

Writing—review and editing: Tom Clune, Amy Lockwood, Serina Hancock, Andrew Thompson, Mieghan Bruce, Sue Beetson, Angus Campbell, Elsa Glanville, Daniel Brooks, Colin Trengove, Ryan O’Handley, Caroline Jacobson.

Funding acquisition: Caroline Jacobson, Serina Hancock, Andrew Thompson.

Resources: Caroline Jacobson, Serina Hancock, Andrew Thompson, Ryan O’Handley.

Supervision: Caroline Jacobson, Serina Hancock, Andrew Thompson.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Jacobson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures were conducted according to guidelines of the Australian Code of Practice for the Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes and were approved by the Murdoch University Animal Ethics Committee (R3004/17).

Consent for publication

Participating farms have consented to publication of data. The manuscript was approved for publication by the funding body (Meat and Livestock Australia).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Una Ryan.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clune, T., Lockwood, A., Hancock, S. et al. Neospora caninum is not an important contributor to poor reproductive performance of primiparous ewes from southern Australia: evidence from a cross-sectional study. Parasitol Res 120, 3875–3882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07328-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07328-z

Keywords

Navigation