Abstract
Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a disease of equids caused by Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, members of the order Piroplasmida, transmitted by several species of ticks. As the disease is endemic in many countries, a clinical examination or a serological test are required prior to movement of horses to prove freedom from infection and to avoid the introduction of EP with its sanitary and economic impact, especially in areas where it is absent. Currently, numerous diagnostic PCR protocols are available, some of which are recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). In order to adopt this diagnostic method, the Italian National Reference Centre for Equine Diseases (NRC-ED) conducted a preliminary comparison between an end-point PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR, and commercial real-time PCR, for the detection of T. equi and B. caballi, respectively. One hundred and three field samples, collected during spring-summer 2013 in Latium and Tuscany regions, were employed for the study, and results discordant between detection assays were confirmed by sequencing. The reference assay was defined as that showing the highest sensitivity, and the relative sensitivity (rSe) and specificity (rSp) of the other methods were estimated referring to this assay. Agreement between methods was estimated by calculating the concordance between each pair of methods. Although no statistical differences were detected among PCR-based methods, the non-commercial real-time PCR assays seemed to be the most suitable for detection of T. equi and B. caballi, respectively. An important advantage of direct PCR detection of the pathogen, in comparison to indirect detection using serological methods, is that it allows specific treatment against the causative pathogen species responsible of the infection as well as for the definition of the infectious status of an animal for international movement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avarzed A, Igarashi I, Kanemaru T et al (1997) Improved in vitro cultivation of Babesia caballi. J Vet Med Sci 59:479–481
Bartolomé Del Pino LE, Nardini R, Veneziano V et al (2016) Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses in Central-Southern Italy: sero-molecular survey and associated risk factors. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 7:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.01.011
Battsetseg B, Xuan X, Ikadai H, Bautista JLR, Byambaa B, Boldbaatar D, Battur B, Battsetseg G, Batsukh Z, Igarashi I, Nagasawa H, Mikami T, Fujisaki K (2001) Detection of Babesia caballi and Babesia equi in Dermacentor nuttalli adult ticks. Int J Parasitol 31:384–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00120-5
Bhoora RV, Pienaar R, Cornelius F, Josemans A, Matthee O, Marumo R, Troskie C, Mans BJ (2018) Multiplex hydrolysis-probe assay for the simultaneous detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in equids. Vet Parasitol 255:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.03.022
Bhoora R, Quan M, Franssen L, Butler CM, van der Kolk JH, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Jongejan F, Collins NE (2010) Development and evaluation of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses from South Africa. Vet Parasitol 168:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.011
Bhoora R, Quan M, Zweygarth E, Guthrie AJ, Prinsloo SA, Collins NE (2010) Sequence heterogeneity in the gene encoding the rhoptry-associated protein-1 (RAP-1) of Babesia caballi isolates from South Africa. Vet Parasitol 169:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.009
Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafò MR (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:365–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
Montes-Cortés MG, Fernandez-Garcia JL, Martínez-Estéllez MÁH (2019) A multinested PCR for detection of the equine piroplasmids Babesia caballi and Theileria equi. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 10:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.11.008
Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC (2003) Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe: Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history. Vet Parasitol 114:173–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00141-9
Debode F, Marien A, Janssen É et al (2017) The influence of amplicon length on real-time PCR results. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 21(1):3–11
Directive 90/426/CEE on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31990 L0426
Donnellan CMB, Page PC, Nurton JP, van den Berg JS, Guthrie AJ (2013) Comparison of glycopyrrolate and atropine in ameliorating the adverse effects of imidocarb dipropionate in horses. Equine Vet J 45:625–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12032
Friedhoff KT, Tenter AM, Müller I (1990) Haemoparasites of equines: impact on international trade of horses. Rev Sci Tech 9(4):1187–1194
Grause JF, Ueti MW, Nelson JT, Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Bunn TO (2013) Efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate in eliminating Theileria equi from experimentally infected horses. Vet J 196:541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.025
Ikadai H, Xuan X, Igarashi I, Tanaka S, Kanemaru T, Nagasawa H, Fujisaki K, Suzuki N, Mikami T (1999) Cloning and expression of a 48-kilodalton Babesia caballi merozoite rhoptry protein and potential use of the recombinant antigen in an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 37:3475–3480
Kappmeyer LS, Thiagarajan M, Herndon DR, Ramsay JD, Caler E, Djikeng A, Gillespie JJ, Lau AOT, Roalson EH, Silva JC, Silva MG, Suarez CE, Ueti MW, Nene VM, Mealey RH, Knowles DP, Brayton KA (2012) Comparative genomic analysis and phylogenetic position of Theileria equi. BMC Genomics 13:603. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-603
Kim C, Blanco LBC, Alhassan A, Iseki H, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Igarashi I (2008) Diagnostic real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Theileria equi from equine blood samples. Vet Parasitol 151:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.023
Lobanov VA, Peckle M, Massard CL, Brad Scandrett W, Gajadhar AA (2018) Development and validation of a duplex real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. Parasit Vectors 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2751-6
Manna G, Cersini A, Nardini R, Bartolomé del Pino LE, Antognetti V, Zini M, Conti R, Lorenzetti R, Veneziano V, Autorino GL, Scicluna MT (2018) Genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infecting horses of Central-Southern Italy and preliminary results of its correlation with clinical and serological status. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 9:1212–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.05.005
Nagore D, García-Sanmartín J, García-Pérez AL et al (2004) Detection and identification of equine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blotting: epidemiological survey and phylogenetic analysis. Vet Parasitol 123:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.010
Nicolaiewsky TB, Richter MF, Lunge VR, Cunha CW, Delagostin O, Ikuta N, Fonseca AS, da Silva SS, Ozaki LS (2001) Detection of Babesia equi (Laveran, 1901) by nested polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol 101:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00471-X
OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (2019) http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.05.08_EQUINE_PIROPLASMOSIS.pdf
Rampersad J, Cesar E, Campbell MD, Samlal M, Ammons D (2003) A field evaluation of PCR for the routine detection of Babesia equi in horses. Vet Parasitol 114:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00129-8
Schnittger L, Rodriguez AE, Florin-Christensen M, Morrison DA (2012) Babesia: a world emerging. Infect Genet Evol 12:1788–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.004
Scoles G, Ueti MW (2015) Vector ecology of equine piroplasmosis. Annu Rev Entomol 60:561–580. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021110
Tirosh-Levy S, Steinman A, Levy H et al (2020) Parasite load and genotype are associated with clinical outcome of piroplasm infected equines in Israel. Parasit Vectors:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04133-y
Toffan A, Olivier A, Mancin M, Tuttoilmondo V, Facco D, Capua I, Terregino C (2010) Evaluation of different serological tests for the detection of antibodies against highly pathogenic avian influenza in experimentally infected ostriches (Struthio camelus). Avian Pathol 39:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450903431390
Veiga Quemelo PR, Lopes da Fonseca BA, Malta Lima D, Peres LC (2009) Influence of amplicon size on the polymerase chain reaction of Parvovirus B19 genome in formalin-fixed specimens. J Bras Patol e Med Lab 45:119–123
Yokoyama N, Suthisak B, Hirata H et al (2002) Cellular localization of Babesia bovis merozoite rhoptry-associated protein 1 and its erythrocyte-binding activity. 70:5822–5826. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.10.5822
Zweygarth E, Just MC, De Waal DT (1997) In vitro cultivation of Babesia equi: detection of carrier animals and isolation of parasites. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 64:51–56
Funding
This study was conducted within the IZSLT 16/11, research project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement on the welfare of animals
This article does not contain any studies on animals performed by any of the authors. Blood samples were collected by veterinary practitioners during their clinical activities for diagnostic purposes.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Section Editor: Leonhard Schnittger
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nardini, R., Bartolomé Del Pino, L.E., Cersini, A. et al. Comparison of PCR-based methods for the detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in field samples collected in Central Italy. Parasitol Res 120, 2157–2164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07153-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07153-4