Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with different anthelmintic compounds on the productivity of naturally infected calves and the economic viability of these treatments within extensive breeding systems employing different nutritional strategies after weaning. For this purpose, 4 farms with 42–60 calves naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes were selected. The calves were distributed into 6 groups (7–10 animals each) per farm and treated with ivermectin 1%, ivermectin 3.15%, eprinomectin 5%, levamisole 7.5%, albendazole 15%, and control group (no treatment). These animals were evaluated over an experimental period of 150 days. Levamisole 7.5% presented the best capacity for the reduction of eggs per gram (EPG) of feces in all herds evaluated, followed by albendazole 15% and eprinomectin 5%. Parasite resistance to multiple drugs was found in all herds, especially those of Cooperia, Haemonchus, Oesophagostomum, and Trichostrongylus. For farm 1, differences in weight gain and EPG reduction percentages led to a difference of US$285.06 between the levamisole and ivermectin 3.15% groups. Similar findings were noted for the levamisole and ivermectin 1% groups of farm 3, with a difference of US$399.37 because of the final weight gain in these groups. For farms 2 and 4, the ivermectin 3.15% and control groups, respectively, were the most profitable; these unexpected results were possibly influenced by variables not measured during the experimental period. This study suggested that anthelmintic treatments should always precede an efficacy test, once they are demonstrated to be most profitable under adequate breeding conditions, to ensure adequate control of gastrointestinal nematode infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amarante AFT (2004) Controle integrado de helmintos de bovinos e ovinos. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 13:68–71
Bianchin I, Catto JB, Kichel AN (2007) The effect of the control of endo- and ectoparasites on weight gains in crossbred cattle (Bos Taurus taurus×Bos taurus indicus) in the central region of Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod 39:287–296
Borges FA, Almeida GD, Heckler RP, Lemes RT, Onizuka MK, Borges DGL (2013) Anthelmintic resistance impact on tropical beef cattle productivity: effect on weight gain of weaned calves. Trop Anim Health Prod 45:723–727
Candy PM, Waghorn TS, Miller CM, Ganesh S, Leathwick DM (2018) The effect on liveweight gain of using anthelmintics with incomplete efficacy against resistant Cooperia oncophora in cattle. Vet Parasitol 251:56–62
Cezar SA, Catto JB, Bianchin I (2008) Alternative control of the gastrointestinal nematodes of the ruminants: actuality and perspectives. Cienc Rural 38(7):2083–2091
Cezar AS, Vogel FSF, Sangioni LA, Antonello AM, Camillo G, Toscan G, Araujo LO (2010) Anthelminthic action of different formulations of lactones macrocíclicas on resistant strains of nematodes of cattle. Pesqui Vet Bras 30:523–528
Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FH, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA, Waller PJ (1992) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 44:35–44
Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J (2006) The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 136:167–185
Condi GK, Soutello RGV, Amarante AFT (2009) Moxidectin-resistant nematodes in cattle in Brasil. Vet Parasitol 161:213–217
Coop RL, Kyriazakis I (2001) Influence of host nutrition on the development and consequences of nematode parasitism in ruminants. Trends Parasitol 17:325–330
Craig TM (2018) Gastrointestinal nematodes, diagnosis and control. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 34:185–199
Cristel S, Fiel C, Anziani O, Descarga C, Cetrá B, Romero J, Fernández S, Entrocasso C, Lloberasi M, Medus D, Steffan P (2017) Anthelmintic resistance in grazing beef cattle in central and northeastern areas of Argentina — an update. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 9:25–28
Demeler J, Van Zeveren AM, Kleinschmidt N, Vercruysse J, Höglund J, Koopmann R, Cabaret J, Claerebout E, Areskog M, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2009) Monitoring the efficacy of ivermectin and albendazole against gastro intestinal nematodes of cattle in Northern Europe. Vet Parasitol 160:109–115
Fazzio LE, Sánchez RO, Streitenberger N, Galvan WR, Giudici CJ, Gimeno EJ (2014) The effect of anthelmintic resistance on the productivity infeedlot cattle. Vet Parasitol 206:240–245
Gasbarre LC (2014) Anthelmintic resistance in cattle nematodes in the US. Vet Parasitol 204:3–11
Grisi L, Leite RC, Martins JRDS, Barros ATMD, Andreotti R, Cançado PHD, León AAP, Villela HS (2014) Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 23(2):150–156
Hawkins JA (1993) Economic benefits of parasite control in cattle. Vet Parasitol 46:159–173
Hedrick HB, Thompson GB, Krause GF (1969) Comparison of feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of half-sib bullus, steers and heifers. J Anim Sci 29(5):687–694
James CE, Hudson AL, Davey MW (2009) Drug resistance mechanisms in helminths: is it survival of the fittest? Trends Parasitol 25(7):328–335
Lopes WDZ, Felippelli G, Pires Teixeira WF, Cruz BC, Maciel WG, Buzzulini C, Shigaki de Matos LV, Costa Gomes LV, Melo Pereira JC, Fávero FC, Oliveira GP, da Costa AJ (2014) Resistance of Haemonchus placei infection, Cooperia punctate and Oesophagostomum radiatum to ivermectin pour-on of 500 mcg kg_1 in cattle herds in Brazil. Cien Rural 44:847–853
Lyndal-Murphy M, Swain AJ, Pepper PM (2014) Methods to determine resistance to anthelmintics when continuing larval development occurs. Vet Parasitol 199:191–200
Martínez-Valladares M, Geurden T, Bartram DJ, Martínez-Pérez JM, Robles-Pérez D, Bohórquez A, Florez E, Meana A, Rojovázquez FA (2015) Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to the most commonly used anthelmintics in sheep, cattle and horses in Spain. Vet Parasitol 211:228–233
McKenna PB (1998) The effect of previous cold storage on the subsequent recovery of infective third stage nematode larvae from sheep faeces. Vet Parasitol 80:167–172
Mello MHA, Depner R, Molento MB, Ferreira JJ (2006) Side-resistance to macrolactones in cattle nematodes. Arch Vet Sci 11(1):8–12
Miller CM, Waghorna TS, Leathwick DM, Candy PM, Olivera A-MB, Watson TG (2012) The production cost of anthelmintic resistance in lambs. Vet Parasitol 186:376–381
Nelson CJ, Moser LE (1994) Plant factors affecting forage quality. In: Fahey GC Jr (ed) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Chap 3, Madison, pp 115–154
Neves JHD, Carvalho N, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, Amarante AFT (2014) 2014. Diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in cattle in Brazil: a comparison of different methodologies. Vet Parasitol 206:216–226
Pathak AK (2017) Nutritional bases to control gastrointestinal parasites of livestock. Dairy and Vet Sci J 4:555632
Pellegrini CB, Medeiros RB, Carlotto SB, Garcia RPA, Lisboa CV, Bruning G (2016) Nutritive value of a native pasture dominated by Eragrostis plana Nees and its relation with metabolic profile of primiparous cows supplemented from pregnancy to postpartum. Ci Anim Bras 17:154–163
Perry BD, Randolph TF, McDermott JJ, Sones KR, Thornton PK (2002) Investing in animal health research to alleviate poverty. ILRI, Nairobi 148pp
Prichard RK (1980) The problem of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes. Aust Vet J 56:239–251
R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 May 2018
Ramos F, Portella LP, Rodrigues FS, Reginato CZ, Pötter L, Cezar AS, Sangioni LA, Vogel FSF (2016) Anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of beef cattle in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 6:93–101
Sargison ND, Wilson DJ, Penny CD, Bartley DJ (2010) Unexpected production loss caused by helminth parasites in weaned beef calves. Vet Rec 167:753–754
Souza AP, Ramos CI, Bellato V, Sartor AA, Schelbauer CA (2008) Anthelmintics resistance of bovine gastrointestinal helminths in Santa Catarina Plateau. Cienc Rural 38(5):1363–1367
Stotzer ES, Lopes LB, Eckstein C, Moraes MCMM, Rodrigues DS, Bastianetto E (2014) Impacto econômico das doenças parasitárias na pecuária. Rev bras hig sanid anim 8(3):198–221
Sutherland IA, Leathwick DM (2011) Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: a global issue? Trends Parasitol 27:176–181
Sutherland IA, Scott I (2009) Anthelmintics. In Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Sheep and Cattle: Biology and Control. WileyBlackwell, Hoboken 256pp
Torgerson PR, Paul M, Furrer R (2014) Evaluating faecal egg count reduction usinga specifically designed package “eggCounts” in R and a user friendly web interface. Int J Parasitol 44:299–303
Van Wyk JA, Mayhew E (2013) Morphological identification of parasitic nematode infective larvae of small ruminants and cattle: a practical lab guide. J Vet Res 80:1–14
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the availability and collaboration of producers and their employees who performed this work. We also thank Dr. Alfredo S. Cezar for collaborating with us on this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Section Editor: Xing-Quan Zhu
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos, F., Marques, C.B., Reginato, C.Z. et al. Economic viability of anthelmintic treatment in naturally infected beef cattle under different nutritional strategies after weaning. Parasitol Res 117, 3993–4002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6108-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6108-z