Parasitology Research

, Volume 117, Issue 8, pp 2507–2520 | Cite as

Predicting species richness of ectoparasites of wild rodents from the Río de la Plata coastal wetlands, Argentina

  • Gerardo G. Liljesthröm
  • Marcela Lareschi
Original Paper


The richness of ectoparasite species associated with Sigmodontinae rodents (Cricetidae) from different sites located in the coastal wetlands of the Río de la Plata in Argentina was predicted by a model with three components: (1) habitat type, considered analogous to rodent species; (2) average ectoparasite species richness on each rodent species, and (3) average number of rodent species parasitized by each ectoparasite species. The model, based on rodent information (number of species and total number of captured rodents) and the environmental gradient, has a reasonably good fit for the observed data as well as independent data from different localities. The model is predictive and robust, and it could be a useful tool for epidemiological and biodiversity management strategies. Furthermore, the model could be adapted to other habitats if a suitable estimate of an environmental gradient is found, and it could be also possible to adapt it to other host taxa.


Ectoparasites Rodents Model Species richness Argentinean wetlands 



We thank Departamento Areas Protegidas y Difusión Conservacionista del Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina, for its assistance and permission for the development of this research; Marcela Liljesthröm (La Plata, Argentina) and Natália Tóthová (Universtity College London, UK) for the revision of the English language; M. Laura Morote (CEPAVE) for her help with edition of the figures; Carlos Galliari (CEPAVE) for host species update; and to two anonymous reviewers who improved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Samplings were carried out with the corresponding permits of the Departamento Áreas Protegidas y Difusión Conservacionista del Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Supplementary material

436_2018_5940_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 Description of habitat types at Rio de la Plata wetlands, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. (DOCX 20 kb)
436_2018_5940_MOESM2_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 2 Data used for model validation (DOCX 25 kb)


  1. Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrera AL (1949) Las comunidades vegetales de los alrededores de La Plata (Provincia de Buenos Aires, República Argentina). Lilloa 20:269–376Google Scholar
  4. Castro DC, Mauri R, Cicchino AC, Mosquera S (1987) Ectoparásitos de Roedores de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Acarina, Anoplura, Mallophaga y Suctoria). Rev Soc Ent Argent 44:317–327Google Scholar
  5. Colombo VC, Lareschi M, Monje LD, Nava S, Antoniazzi LR, Beldoménico PM, Guglielmone AA (2013) Garrapatas (Ixodida) y ácaros (Mesostigmata) parásitos de roedores sigmodontinos del Delta del Paraná, Argentina. FAVE Secc Cs Vet 12:39–50Google Scholar
  6. Cueto VR, Piantanida MJ, Cagnoni,M (1995) Population demography of Oxymycterus rufus (Rodentia: Cricetidae) inhabiting a patchy environment of the delta of the Paraná River, Argentina. Acta Theriol 40:123–130Google Scholar
  7. Dascanio LM, Barrera MD, Frangi JL (1996) Biomasa structure and dry matter dynamics of subtropical alluvial and exotic Ligustrum forests at the Río de la Plata, Argentina. Vegetatio 15:61–76Google Scholar
  8. Fortuna MA, Stouffer DB, Olesen JM, Jordano P, Mouillot D, Krasnov B, Poulin R, Bascompteet J (2010) Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J Anim Ecol 79:811–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandini M (2011) Regionalización Agroproductiva de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Informe final. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.ón-Agroproductiva-de-la-provincia-de-Buenos-Aires
  11. Gil H, García-Esteban C, Barandika JF, Peig J, Toledo A, Escudero R et al (2010) Variability of Bartonella genotypes among small mammals in Spain. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:8062–8070CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez Villafañe IE, Expósito Y, San Martin A, Picca P, Busch M (2012) Rodent diversity and habitat use in a protected area of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Rev Mex Biodivers 83:762–771Google Scholar
  13. Graham SP, Hassan HK, Burkett-Cadena ND, Guyer C, Unnasch TR (2009) Nestedness of ectoparasite-vertebrate hosts networks. PLoS One 4:e7873. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurtado MA, Giénez JE, Cabral G, de Silva M, Martínez OM, Camilión C, Sánchez CA, Muntz D, Gebhard JA, Forte LM., Boff L, Crincoli A, Lucesoli A (2006) Análisis ambiental del partido de La Plata. Aportes al ordenamiento territorial. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Ed. Consejo Federal de Inversiones, La Plata, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Klimpel S, Förster M, Schmahl G (2007) Parasites of two abundant sympatric rodent species in relation to host phylogeny and ecology. Parasitol Res 100:867–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kokot R, Codignotto J (2005) Capítulo 9. Topografía. In: Barros V, Menéndez A, Nagy G (eds) El Cambio Climático en el Río de la Plata. Assessments of impacts and adaptations to climate change (AIACC), START-TWAS-UNEP, pp 107–111Google Scholar
  17. Krasnov BR, Khokhlova IS, Shenbrot GI (2003) Density-dependent host selection in ectoparasites: an application of insular theory to fleas parasitizing rodents. Oecologia 134:365–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Poulin R (2011) Beta-specificity: the turnover of host species in space and another way to easure host specificity. Int J Parasitol 41:33–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lareschi M, Notarnicola J, Navone G, Linardi PM (2003) Arthropod and filarioid parasites associated with wild rodents from the northeast marshes of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98:673–677Google Scholar
  20. Marshall AG (1981) The ecology of ectoparasitic insects. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. May RM, Anderson RM (1978) Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: II. Destabilizing processes. J Animal Ecol 47:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muñoz G, Grutter AS, Cribb TH, (2006) Endoparasite communities of five fish species (Labridae: Cheilininae) from Lizard Island: how important is the ecology and phylogeny of the hosts?. Parasitol 132 (03):363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muñoz-Pedreros A, Gil C, Yáñez J, Rau JR, Möller P (2016) Trophic ecology of two raptors, barn owl (Tyto alba) and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), and possible implications for biological control of hantavirus reservoir in Chile. Wilson J Ornithol 128:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nava S, Lareschi M, Voglino D (2003) Interrelationship between ectoparasites and wild rodents from northeastern Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98:45–49Google Scholar
  25. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poulin R (2014) Parasite biodiversity revisited: frontiers and constraints. Int J Parasitol 44:581–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Qian H, Ricklefs RE, White PS (2005) Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecol Lett 8:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schluter D, Ricklefs RE (1993) Species diversity: an introduction to the problem. In: Ricklefs RE, Servicio de Hidrografía Naval,
  29. Soberón J, Llorente J (1993) The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conserv Biol 7:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Takemoto T, Kanamaru S, Feng W (2014) Climatic seasonality may affect ecological network structure: food webs and mutualistic networks. Biosyst 121:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulrich W, Almeida-Neto M (2012) On the meanings of nestedness: back to the basics. Ecography 35:65–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whittaker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol Rev 42:207–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CONICET-UNLP)La PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations