Postembryonic development of Arostrilepis microtis Gulyaev et Chechulin, 1997 (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae)

Abstract

The development of the metacestode stages of Arostrilepis microtis (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) studied on the basis of an experimental infection of springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae) is described for the first time. A complete description of the ontogeny from oncosphere to fully a developed metacestode is given. The postembryonic development within the intermediate host includes one invagination. Cysts are without an anterior invagination pore, and the cercomer does not separate after the full maturation of larva. The comparison of morphology and maturation rate of larval cestodes of A. microtis with A. beringiensis and A. tenuicirrosa is presented. Cysticercoids of A. microtis are significantly larger and require a longer period of development than those of A. beringiensis and A. tenuicirrosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Caley J (1974) The functional significance of scolex retraction and subsequent cyst formation in the cysticercoid larva of Hymenolepis microstoma. Parasitology 68:207–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000045741

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chechulin AI, Krivopalov AV, Gulyaev VD, Berezina OG (2004) [Collembola Supraphorura furcifera (Börner) (Collembola: Onychiuridae) a new intermediate host of Arostrilepis horrida (Linstow, 1901) Mas-Coma et Tenora, 1997 (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae).] The Proceedings of International Symposium dedicated to 125-year Anniversary of K.I. Skrjabin and 60-years Anniversary from foundation of Helminthological Laboratory of USSR AS Institute of Parasitology RAS (April 14–16, 2004, Moscow), Moscow, pp 344–346 (In Russian)

  3. Chernova NM, Striganova BR (Eds) (1988) [Identification keys to collembolans of fauna of the USSR.] Nauka, Moscow, p 212 (in Russian)

  4. Chervy L (2002) The terminology of larval cestodes or metacestodes. Syst Parasitol 52:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015086301717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dogiel VA (1962) General parasitology. 3rd edition. Oliver and Boyd, London, p 516, English Translation 1964

  6. Goodchild CG, Stullken RE (1970) Hymenolepis microstoma: cysticercoid morphogenesis. Trans Am Microsc Soc 89:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulyaev VD, Chechulin AI (1997) Arostrilepis microtis n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae): a new cestode species from Siberian rodents. Res Rev Parasitol 57:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gulyaev VD, Ishigenova LA, Kornienko SA (2010) Morphogenesis of Staphylocystis furcata cysticercoid (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae). Parasitologiya 44:12–21 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishigenova LA, Krivopalov AV, Berezina OG (2013) The role of Collembola in life cycle implementation of cestode Arostrilepis tenuicirrosa Makarikov, Gulyaev et Kontrimavichus, 2011. Evraziat Entomol Z 12:457–461 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kisielewska K (1960) Life cycle of the tapeworm Pseudodiorchis prolifer (Villot, 1890) comb. nova (= Pseudodiorchis multispinosa Zarnowski, 1955). Acta Parasitol Pol 8:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kontrimavichus VL, Smirnova LV (1991) Hymenolepis beringiensis sp. n. from the Siberian lemming (Lemmus sibiricus Kerr) and the problem of the sibling species in helminthology. In: Krasnoschekov GP, Roitman VA, Sonin MD, Chesnova LV (eds) Evoljucia parazitov. Materialy I Vsesojuznogo Simpoziuma, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Tol’yatti, pp 90–104 (In Russian)

  12. Lefebvre F, Georgiev BB, Bray R, Littlewood DTJ (2009a) Developing a dedicated cestode life cycle database: lessons from the hymenolepidids. Helminthologia 46:21–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-009-0004-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lefebvre F, Georgiev BB, Bray R, Littlewood DTJ (2009b). Cestode Life Cycle Database. www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/cestode-life-cycle/index.html. Accessed July, 2015

  14. Makarikov AA, Gulyaev VD, Kontrimavichus VL (2011) A redescription of Arostrilepis horrida (Linstow, 1901) and descriptions of two new species from Palaearctic microtine rodents, Arostrilepis macrocirrosa sp. n. and A. tenuicirrosa sp. n. (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). Folia Parasitol 58:108–120. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2011.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Makarikov AA, Galbreath KE, Hoberg EP (2013) Parasite diversity at the Holarctic nexus: species of Arostrilepis (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in voles and lemmings (Cricetidae: Arvicolinae) from greater Beringia. Zootaxa 3608:401–439. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3608.6.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Makarikov AA, Hoberg EP (2016) Broadening diversity in the Arostrilepis horrida complex: Arostrilepis kontrimavichusi n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) in the western red-backed vole Myodes californicus (Merriam) (Cricetidae: Arvicolinae) from temperate latitudes of the Pacific Northwest, North America. Syst Parasitol 93:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-016-9640-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsaberidze G, Prokopič J, Zarkua G (1986) Life cycle of the tapeworm Triodontolepis kurashvilii Prokopic et Matsaberidze, 1971. Folia Parasitol 33:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mas-Coma S, Tenora F (1997) Proposal of arostrilepis n. gen. (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). Res Rev Parasitol 57:93–101

  19. Musser GG, Carelton MD (2005) Superfamily Muroidea. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 894–1522

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obushenkov IN, Rudzhanskaite AF (1984) The development Hymenolepis scutigera and Cucurbilepis skrjabini (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae) from insectivorous mammals. Parasitologiya 18:321–324 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prokopič J (1971) The life cycle of the cestode Rodentolepis erinacei (Gmelin, 1789). Folia Parasitol 18:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sawada I (1997) A world checklist of cestode species from Chiroptera. Published by the Author, Nara City, Japan, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skrjabin KI, Mathevossian EM (1942) Stages in the postembryonic development of cestodes of the family Hymenolepididae and an attempt to establish morphological types of their larvicysts. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 10:83–85 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smirnova LV, Kontrimavichus VL (1977) [Collembolans – intermediate hosts of cestodes of mouse-like rodents of Chukotka.] Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 236:771–772 (In Russian)

  25. Spassky AA (1947) The phenomenon of confluence of proglottides and uteri in cestodes. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 58:723–724 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spassky AA (1948) Mathevolepis petrotschenkoi nov. gen. nov. sp. – a new species of cestode with uterine canal for production of eggs. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 59:1513–1515 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spassky AA (1954) Classification of hymenolepidids of mammals. Trudy Gel’mintologcheskoy Laboratorii. Akad Nauk SSSR 7:120–167 (In Russian)

  28. Spassky AA (1959) Classification precision of topographic relations of genitals in Hymenolepididae. Zool Zhurnal 38:31–37 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smirnova LV (1980a) Life cycle and postembryonal development of cestode Hymenolepis horrida (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae). Parasitologiya 14:467–471 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smirnova LV (1980b) The development of the cysticercoid of Paranoplocephala omphalodes (Anoplocephalidae) in springtails. Parasitologiya 14:418–421 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tkach VV, Vasileva GP, Genov T (2003) Description of Vaucherilepis trichophorus sp. nov., gen. nov. (Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae) from water shrews and gammarid crustaceans in Bulgaria and Ukraine. Acta Parasitol 48:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vaucher C (1971) Les Cestodes parasites des Soricidae d’Europe. Etude anatomique, révision taxonomique et biologie. Rev Suisse Zool 78:1–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Villot FCA (1877) Sur une nouvelle forme larvaire des Cestoides. Premiere note. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci 84:1097–1098

    Google Scholar 

  34. Villot FCA (1880) Sur une nouvelle forme de ver vésiculaire, à bourgeonnement exogène. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci 91:938–940

    Google Scholar 

  35. Voge M (1960) Studies in cysticercoid histology. IV. Observations on histogenesis in the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). J Parasitol 46:717–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Volpert YL, Shadrina EG (2002) Small mammals of the North-East Siberia. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p 246 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weinland DF (1858) Human cestoides. An essay on the tapeworms of man. Metcalf and Co., Cambridge, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yamaguti S (1959) Systema helminthum. vol. II. The cestodes of vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing House, Tokyo, p 860

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yudin BS, Galkina LI, Potapkina AF (1979) Mammals of the Altai-Sayan Mountain Country. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p 296 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was made on the basis of the Teletskyi Research Field Station of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. We sincerely thank Dr. Eric P. Hoberg for his useful remarks and checking the English of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Scott L. Gardner and the reviewer for their detailed comments that improved the manuscript.

Funding

A substantial portion of the work was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos. 17-04-00088-а and 17-04-00227-a). Further support was provided by the Federal Fundamental Scientific Research Program for 2013–2020, grant no. VI.51.1.5 (АААА-А16-116121410121-7).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arseny A. Makarikov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors carefully reviewed the ethical standards of the journal and hereby certify that the procedures used with the investigated species comply fully with those standards. The methods used in the current study were approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk, Russia (ISEA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishigenova, L.A., Berezina, O.G. & Makarikov, A.A. Postembryonic development of Arostrilepis microtis Gulyaev et Chechulin, 1997 (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Parasitol Res 117, 2411–2417 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5929-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Larval cestodes
  • Hymenolepididae
  • Arostrilepis
  • Life cycle
  • Cysticercoids
  • Intermediate hosts
  • Springtails