Parasitology Research

, Volume 117, Issue 8, pp 2411–2417 | Cite as

Postembryonic development of Arostrilepis microtis Gulyaev et Chechulin, 1997 (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae)

  • Liudmila A. Ishigenova
  • Olga G. Berezina
  • Arseny A. MakarikovEmail author
Original Paper


The development of the metacestode stages of Arostrilepis microtis (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) studied on the basis of an experimental infection of springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae) is described for the first time. A complete description of the ontogeny from oncosphere to fully a developed metacestode is given. The postembryonic development within the intermediate host includes one invagination. Cysts are without an anterior invagination pore, and the cercomer does not separate after the full maturation of larva. The comparison of morphology and maturation rate of larval cestodes of A. microtis with A. beringiensis and A. tenuicirrosa is presented. Cysticercoids of A. microtis are significantly larger and require a longer period of development than those of A. beringiensis and A. tenuicirrosa.


Larval cestodes Hymenolepididae Arostrilepis Life cycle Cysticercoids Intermediate hosts Springtails 



This study was made on the basis of the Teletskyi Research Field Station of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. We sincerely thank Dr. Eric P. Hoberg for his useful remarks and checking the English of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Scott L. Gardner and the reviewer for their detailed comments that improved the manuscript.


A substantial portion of the work was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos. 17-04-00088-а and 17-04-00227-a). Further support was provided by the Federal Fundamental Scientific Research Program for 2013–2020, grant no. VI.51.1.5 (АААА-А16-116121410121-7).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors carefully reviewed the ethical standards of the journal and hereby certify that the procedures used with the investigated species comply fully with those standards. The methods used in the current study were approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk, Russia (ISEA).


  1. Caley J (1974) The functional significance of scolex retraction and subsequent cyst formation in the cysticercoid larva of Hymenolepis microstoma. Parasitology 68:207–227. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chechulin AI, Krivopalov AV, Gulyaev VD, Berezina OG (2004) [Collembola Supraphorura furcifera (Börner) (Collembola: Onychiuridae) a new intermediate host of Arostrilepis horrida (Linstow, 1901) Mas-Coma et Tenora, 1997 (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae).] The Proceedings of International Symposium dedicated to 125-year Anniversary of K.I. Skrjabin and 60-years Anniversary from foundation of Helminthological Laboratory of USSR AS Institute of Parasitology RAS (April 14–16, 2004, Moscow), Moscow, pp 344–346 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Chernova NM, Striganova BR (Eds) (1988) [Identification keys to collembolans of fauna of the USSR.] Nauka, Moscow, p 212 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Chervy L (2002) The terminology of larval cestodes or metacestodes. Syst Parasitol 52:1–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dogiel VA (1962) General parasitology. 3rd edition. Oliver and Boyd, London, p 516, English Translation 1964Google Scholar
  6. Goodchild CG, Stullken RE (1970) Hymenolepis microstoma: cysticercoid morphogenesis. Trans Am Microsc Soc 89:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gulyaev VD, Chechulin AI (1997) Arostrilepis microtis n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae): a new cestode species from Siberian rodents. Res Rev Parasitol 57:103–107Google Scholar
  8. Gulyaev VD, Ishigenova LA, Kornienko SA (2010) Morphogenesis of Staphylocystis furcata cysticercoid (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae). Parasitologiya 44:12–21 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Ishigenova LA, Krivopalov AV, Berezina OG (2013) The role of Collembola in life cycle implementation of cestode Arostrilepis tenuicirrosa Makarikov, Gulyaev et Kontrimavichus, 2011. Evraziat Entomol Z 12:457–461 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Kisielewska K (1960) Life cycle of the tapeworm Pseudodiorchis prolifer (Villot, 1890) comb. nova (= Pseudodiorchis multispinosa Zarnowski, 1955). Acta Parasitol Pol 8:197–204Google Scholar
  11. Kontrimavichus VL, Smirnova LV (1991) Hymenolepis beringiensis sp. n. from the Siberian lemming (Lemmus sibiricus Kerr) and the problem of the sibling species in helminthology. In: Krasnoschekov GP, Roitman VA, Sonin MD, Chesnova LV (eds) Evoljucia parazitov. Materialy I Vsesojuznogo Simpoziuma, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Tol’yatti, pp 90–104 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Lefebvre F, Georgiev BB, Bray R, Littlewood DTJ (2009a) Developing a dedicated cestode life cycle database: lessons from the hymenolepidids. Helminthologia 46:21–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lefebvre F, Georgiev BB, Bray R, Littlewood DTJ (2009b). Cestode Life Cycle Database. Accessed July, 2015
  14. Makarikov AA, Gulyaev VD, Kontrimavichus VL (2011) A redescription of Arostrilepis horrida (Linstow, 1901) and descriptions of two new species from Palaearctic microtine rodents, Arostrilepis macrocirrosa sp. n. and A. tenuicirrosa sp. n. (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). Folia Parasitol 58:108–120. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Makarikov AA, Galbreath KE, Hoberg EP (2013) Parasite diversity at the Holarctic nexus: species of Arostrilepis (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in voles and lemmings (Cricetidae: Arvicolinae) from greater Beringia. Zootaxa 3608:401–439. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Makarikov AA, Hoberg EP (2016) Broadening diversity in the Arostrilepis horrida complex: Arostrilepis kontrimavichusi n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) in the western red-backed vole Myodes californicus (Merriam) (Cricetidae: Arvicolinae) from temperate latitudes of the Pacific Northwest, North America. Syst Parasitol 93:467–477. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsaberidze G, Prokopič J, Zarkua G (1986) Life cycle of the tapeworm Triodontolepis kurashvilii Prokopic et Matsaberidze, 1971. Folia Parasitol 33:65–68Google Scholar
  18. Mas-Coma S, Tenora F (1997) Proposal of arostrilepis n. gen. (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). Res Rev Parasitol 57:93–101Google Scholar
  19. Musser GG, Carelton MD (2005) Superfamily Muroidea. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 894–1522Google Scholar
  20. Obushenkov IN, Rudzhanskaite AF (1984) The development Hymenolepis scutigera and Cucurbilepis skrjabini (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae) from insectivorous mammals. Parasitologiya 18:321–324 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. Prokopič J (1971) The life cycle of the cestode Rodentolepis erinacei (Gmelin, 1789). Folia Parasitol 18:27–32Google Scholar
  22. Sawada I (1997) A world checklist of cestode species from Chiroptera. Published by the Author, Nara City, Japan, p 65Google Scholar
  23. Skrjabin KI, Mathevossian EM (1942) Stages in the postembryonic development of cestodes of the family Hymenolepididae and an attempt to establish morphological types of their larvicysts. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 10:83–85 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Smirnova LV, Kontrimavichus VL (1977) [Collembolans – intermediate hosts of cestodes of mouse-like rodents of Chukotka.] Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 236:771–772 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Spassky AA (1947) The phenomenon of confluence of proglottides and uteri in cestodes. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 58:723–724 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  26. Spassky AA (1948) Mathevolepis petrotschenkoi nov. gen. nov. sp. – a new species of cestode with uterine canal for production of eggs. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 59:1513–1515 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  27. Spassky AA (1954) Classification of hymenolepidids of mammals. Trudy Gel’mintologcheskoy Laboratorii. Akad Nauk SSSR 7:120–167 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  28. Spassky AA (1959) Classification precision of topographic relations of genitals in Hymenolepididae. Zool Zhurnal 38:31–37 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  29. Smirnova LV (1980a) Life cycle and postembryonal development of cestode Hymenolepis horrida (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae). Parasitologiya 14:467–471 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Smirnova LV (1980b) The development of the cysticercoid of Paranoplocephala omphalodes (Anoplocephalidae) in springtails. Parasitologiya 14:418–421 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Tkach VV, Vasileva GP, Genov T (2003) Description of Vaucherilepis trichophorus sp. nov., gen. nov. (Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae) from water shrews and gammarid crustaceans in Bulgaria and Ukraine. Acta Parasitol 48:87–97Google Scholar
  32. Vaucher C (1971) Les Cestodes parasites des Soricidae d’Europe. Etude anatomique, révision taxonomique et biologie. Rev Suisse Zool 78:1–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Villot FCA (1877) Sur une nouvelle forme larvaire des Cestoides. Premiere note. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci 84:1097–1098Google Scholar
  34. Villot FCA (1880) Sur une nouvelle forme de ver vésiculaire, à bourgeonnement exogène. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci 91:938–940Google Scholar
  35. Voge M (1960) Studies in cysticercoid histology. IV. Observations on histogenesis in the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). J Parasitol 46:717–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Volpert YL, Shadrina EG (2002) Small mammals of the North-East Siberia. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p 246 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  37. Weinland DF (1858) Human cestoides. An essay on the tapeworms of man. Metcalf and Co., Cambridge, p 93Google Scholar
  38. Yamaguti S (1959) Systema helminthum. vol. II. The cestodes of vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing House, Tokyo, p 860Google Scholar
  39. Yudin BS, Galkina LI, Potapkina AF (1979) Mammals of the Altai-Sayan Mountain Country. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p 296 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Systematics and Ecology of AnimalsSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations