Human cystic echinococcosis in Turkey: a preliminary study on DNA polymorphisms of hydatid cysts removed from confirmed patients
- 123 Downloads
Cystic echinococcosis caused by the larval stages of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato s.l is endemic in Turkey with a high public health impact particularly in rural areas. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic variation and population structure of E. granulosus s.s using metacestode isolates removed from surgically confirmed patients originating from several regions in Turkey and to investigate the occurrence of autochthonous transmission. Using DNA extracted from a total of 46 human-derived CE isolates, we successfully analysed an 827-bp fragment within the cox1 mitochondrial gene and confirmed the causative agent of human cystic echinococcosis in patients included in this study to be Echinococcus granulosus s.s (G1 and G3 genotypes). The haplotype parsimony network consisted of 28 haplotypes arranged within three main clusters and the neutrality indices were both negative and significant indicating negative selection or population expansion. The assessment carried out in this study using GenBank nucleotide sequence data from Turkey for sheep and cattle hosts demonstrated the importance of autochthonous transmission with sheep, cattle and humans harbouring the same haplotypes. Further studies are required to investigate the biological significance, if any, of E. granulosus s.s haplotypes and the genetic variability of CE from human patients using longer nucleotide sequences and a larger sample set.
KeywordsEchinococcus granulosus sensu stricto Human cystic echinococcosis Population structure Genetic variation Autochthonous transmission Turkey
Compliance with ethical standards
The current study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (GO 14/293-37).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Acioz M (2008) The investigation of prevalence of echinococcosis in human by ELISA, in slaughter animals by observation and in dogs by PCR in Muş province. Dissertation, Cunhuriyet UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Eckert J, Gemmell MA, Meslin FX, Pawlowski ZS (2001) In: WHO/OIE manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern. Paris OIE. pp. 1–265Google Scholar
- Ergin S, Saribas S, Yuksel P, Zengin K, Midilli K, Adas G, Arikan S, Aslan M, Uysal H, Caliskan R, Oner A, Kucukbasmaci O, Kaygusuz A, Torun MM, Kocazeybek B (2010) Genotypic characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus isolated from human in Turkey. Afr J Microbiol Res 4:551–555Google Scholar
- Eroğlu F, Genc A, Koltas IS (2016) The genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus isolates with PCR-RFLP methods in Adana Province. Zirve Med J 1:22–25Google Scholar
- Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166Google Scholar
- Hassan ZI, Meerkhan AA, Boufana B, Hama AA, Ahmed BD, Mohammed W, Mero S, Orsten S, Interisano M, Pozio E, Casulli A (2017) Two haplotype clusters of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in northern Iraq (Kurdistan region) support the hypothesis of a parasite cradle in the Middle East. Acta Trop 172:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinkar L, Laurimae T, Simsek S, Balkaya I, Casulli A, Manfredi MA, Ponce-Gordo F, Varcasia A, Lavikainen A, González LM, Rehbein S, VAN DER Giessen J, Sprong H, Saarma U (2016) High-resolution phylogeography of zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotype G1 with an emphasis on its distribution in Turkey, Italy and Spain. Parasitology 143:1790–1801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinkar L, Laurimäe T, Sharbatkhori M, Mirhendi H, Kia EB, Ponce-Gordo F, Andresiuk V, Simsek S, Lavikainen A, Irshadullah M, Umhang G, Oudni-M'rad M, Acosta-Jamett G, Rehbein S, Saarma U (2017) New mitogenome and nuclear evidence on the phylogeny and taxonomy of the highly zoonotic tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto. Infect Genet Evol 52:52–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Öter K, Bilgin Z, Tınar R, Tuzer E (2011) Tapeworm infections in stray dogs and cats in İstanbul, Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 17:595–599Google Scholar
- Šnàbel V, Altintas N, D’Amelio S, Nakao M, Romig T, Yolasigmaz A, Gunes K, Turk M, Busi M, Hüttner M, Sevcová D, Ito A, Altintas N, Dubinský P (2009) Cystic echinococcosis in Turkey: genetic variability and first record of the pig strain (G7) in the country. Parasitol Res 105:145–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsinomy (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Tavakoli H, Bayat M, Kousha A (2008) Hydatidosis infection study in human and livestock populations during 2002-2007. Am-Eurasian J Agri Environ Sci 4:473–477Google Scholar
- Yazar S, Ozkan AT, Hökelek M, Polat E, Yilmaz H, Özbilge H, Ustun S, Koltaş IS, Ertek M, Sakru N, Alver O, Cetinkaya Z, Koç Z, Demirci M, Aktaş H, Parsak CK, Ozerdem D, Sakman G, Cengiz ZT, Ozer A, Keklik K, Yemenici N, Turan M, Daştan A, Kaya E, Tamer GS, Girginkardeşler N, Türk M, Sinirtaş M, Evci C, Kiliçturgay S, Mutlu F, Artiş T (2008) Cystic echinococcosis in Turkey from 2001-2005. Türkiye Parazitol Derg 32:208–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yolasıgmaz A, Reiterova K, Turk M, Reyhan E, Bozdag AD, Karababa AO, Altintas N, Altintas N (2006) Comparison of serological and clinical findings in Turkish patients with cystic echinococcosis. Helminthologia 43:220–225Google Scholar