Skip to main content
Log in

DNA extraction methods and multiple sampling to improve molecular diagnosis of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle hearts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular detection of Sarcocystis spp. in tissue samples can be useful for experimental and diagnostic purposes. However, the parasite spreads unevenly through tissues, forming tissue cysts, and the cystic wall is an obstacle in DNA extraction protocols. Therefore, adequate sampling and effective disruption of the cysts are essential to improve the accuracy of DNA detection by PCR. The aims of this study were to evaluate the suitability of four protocols for DNA extraction from cysts of Sarcocystis spp. present in bovine myocardium samples or after their harvest in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution as well as determine the effects of single or multiple sampling on the accuracy of molecular diagnosis of sarcocystosis in cattle hearts. Cysts and myocardium samples from nine bovine hearts were randomly distributed to four DNA extraction protocols: kit, kit with modification, DNAzol, and cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Samples were submitted to DNA extraction and PCR as replicates of each heart (simplicate, duplicate, and triplicate), and the probability of a true positive diagnostic was calculated. Among the protocols tested, the kit with modification was determined to be the most suitable for DNA extraction from cysts in PBS solution (92.6 % of DNA detection by PCR); DNAzol resulted in higher DNA detection frequency from bovine myocardium samples (48.1 %). Multiple sampling improved the molecular diagnosis of Sarcocystis spp. infection in cattle hearts, increasing at 22.2 % the rate of true positive diagnostic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babaei Z, Oormazdi H, Rezaie S, Rezaeian M, Razmjou E (2011) Giardia intestinalis: DNA extraction approaches to improve PCR results. Exp Parasitol 128:159–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomczynski P, Mackey K, Drews R, Wilfinger W (1997) DNAzol: a reagent for the rapid isolation of genomic DNA. BioTechniques 22:550–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Lindsay DS (2006) Neosporosis, toxoplasmosis, and sarcocystosis in ruminants. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract 22:645–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Speer CA, Fayer R (1989) Sarcocystosis of animals and man. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Calero-Bernal R, Rosenthal BM, Speer CA, Fayer R (2015a) Sarcocystosis of animals and humans, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Van Wilpe E, Calero-Bernal R, Verma SK, Fayer R (2015b) Sarcocystis heydorni, n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) with cattle (Bos taurus) and human (Homo sapiens) cycle. Parasitol Res 114:4143–4147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Moré G, Van Wilpe E, Calero-Bernal R, Verma SK, Schares G (2016) Sarcocystis rommeli, n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from cattle (Bos taurus) and its differentiation from Sarcocystis hominis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 63:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fayer R, Esposito DH, Dubey JP (2015) Human infections with Sarcocystis species. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:295–311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S, Odening K (1998) Characterization of bovine Sarcocystis species by analysis of their 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. J Parasitol 84:50–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyo M, Battsetseg G, Byambaa B (2002) Prevalence of Sarcocystis infection in meat-producing animals in Mongolia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 33:490–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde B (2016) Molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis bovifelis, Sarcocystis bovini n. sp., Sarcocystis hirsuta and Sarcocystis cruzi from cattle (Bos taurus) and Sarcocystis sinensis from water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Parasitol Res 115:1473–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Güçlü F, Aldem OS, Güler L (2004) Differential identification of cattle Sarcocystis spp. by random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). Rev Med Vet 155:440–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy RA, Payment P, Krull UJ, Horgen PA (2003) Real-time PCR quantification of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in environmental water samples and sewage. J Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5178–5185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moré G, Abrahamovich P, Jurado S, Bacigalupe D, Marin JC, Rambeaud M, Venturini L, Venturini MC (2011) Prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in Argentinean cattle. Vet Parasitol 177:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moré G, Scharesa S, Maksimova FJ, Conrathsa M, Venturini C, Schares G (2013) Development of a multiplex real time PCR to differentiate Sarcocystis spp. affecting cattle. Vet Parasitol 197:85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moré G, Pantchev A, Skuballa J, Langenmayer MC, Maksimov P, Conrath FJ, Venturini MC, Schares G (2014) Sarcocystis sinensis is the most prevalent thick-walled Sarcocystis species in beef on sale for consumers in Germany. Parasitol Res 113:2223–2230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nantavisai K, Mungthin M, Tan-Ariya P, Rangsin R, Naaglor T, Leelayoova S (2007) Evaluation of the sensitivities of DNA extraction and PCR methods for detection of Giardia duodenalis in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 45:581–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritt B, Trainer T, Simmons-Arnold L, Evans M, Dunams D, Rosenthal BM (2008) Detection of Sarcocystis parasites in retail beef: a regional survey combining histological and genetic detection methods. J Food Prot 71:2144–2147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal BM, Dunams DB, Pritt B (2008) Restricted genetic diversity in the ubiquitous cattle parasite, Sarcocystis cruzi. Infect Genet Evol 8:588–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotureau B, Gego A, Carme B (2005) Trypanosomatid protozoa: a simplified DNA isolation procedure. Exp Parasitol 111:207–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, p A1.26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenter AM (1995) Current research on Sarcocystis species of domestic animals. Int J Parasitol 25:1311–1330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vangeel L, Houf K, Chiers K, Vercruysse J, D’Herde K, Ducatelle R (2007) Molecular-based identification of Sarcocystis hominis in Belgian minced beef. J Food Prot 70:1523–1526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vangeel L, Houf K, Geldhof P, De Preter K, Vercruysse J, Ducatelle R, Chiers K (2013) Different Sarcocystis spp. are present in bovine eosinophilic myositis. Vet Parasitol 197:543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Chen M, Buchwald M, Phillips RA (1995) A simple, rapid method for isolation of high quality genomic DNA from animal tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 23:5087–5088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Z, Chen X, Yang L, He Y, Jiang R, Rosenthal BM, Luan P, Atwood SW, Zuo Y, Zhang Y, Yang Z (2009) Non-invasive methods for identifying oocysts of Sarcocystis spp. from definitive hosts. Parasitol Int 58:293–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZQ, Li QQ, Zuo YX, Chen XW, Chen YJ, Nie L, Wei CG, Zen JS, Attwood SW, Whang XZ, Zhang YP (2002) Characterization of Sarcocystis species in domestic animals using a PCR-RFLP analysis of variation in the 18S rRNA gene: a cost-effective and simple technique for routine species identification. Exp Parasitol 102:212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Duszynski DW, Loker ES (2001) A simple method of DNA extraction for Eimeria species. J Microbiol Methods 44:131–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Alfredo S. Cezar is grateful to the Brazilian National Post-doctoral Program of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (PNPD/CAPES; project no. 20132641).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrícia Bräunig.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bräunig, P., Portella, L.P., Cezar, A.S. et al. DNA extraction methods and multiple sampling to improve molecular diagnosis of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle hearts. Parasitol Res 115, 3913–3921 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5158-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5158-3

Keywords

Navigation