Skip to main content
Log in

An insect–tapeworm model as a proxy for anthelminthic effects in the mammalian host

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invertebrate models provide several important advantages over their vertebrate counterparts including fewer legislative stipulations and faster, more cost-effective experimental procedures. Furthermore, various similarities between insect and mammalian systems have been highlighted. To obtain maximum use of invertebrate models in pharmacology, their fidelity as analogues of vertebrate systems requires verification. We utilised a flour beetle (Tenebrio molitor)–tapeworm (Hymenolepis diminuta) model to evaluate the efficacy of known anthelmintic compounds, praziquantel, mebendazole and levamisole against H. diminuta cysticercoid larvae in vitro. Inhibition of cysticercoid activity during the excystation procedure was used as a proxy for worm removal. The effects of the three compounds mirrored their relative efficacy in treatment against adult worms in mammalian systems; however, further study is required to determine the fidelity of this model in relation to dose administered. The model precludes comparison of consecutive daily administration of pharmaceuticals in mammals due to cysticercoids not surviving outside of the host for multiple days. Treatment of beetles in vivo, followed by excystation of cysticercoids postdissection could potentially allow for such comparisons. Further model validation will include analysis of pharmaceutical efficacy in varying H. diminuta isolates and pharmaceutical dilution in solvents other than water. Notwithstanding, our results demonstrate that this model holds promise as a method to efficiently identify promising new cestocidal candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Baumans V (2004) Use of animals in experimental research: an ethical dilemma? Gene Ther 11(Suppl 1):S64–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A, Guyatt H (2000) Reducing intestinal nematode infection: efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole. Parasitol Today 16:71–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett HM, Behm C, Bryant C (1978) Effects of mebendazole and levamisole on tetrathyridia of Mesocestoides corti in the mouse. Int J Parasitol 8:463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan AD (2003) Albendazole, mebendazole and praziquantel. Review of non-clinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Acta Trop 86:141–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S, Meyling NV, Williams AR, Mueller-Harvey I, Fryganas C, Kapel CM, Fredensborg BL (2015) Efficacy of condensed tannins against larval Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) in vitro and in the intermediate host Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera) in vivo. Vet Parasitol 207:49–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild CG, Davis BO (1972) Hymenolepis microstoma cysticercoid activation and excystation in vitro (Cestoda). J Parasitol 58:735–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, Ezekoitz RAB (1999) Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science 284:1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh K, Reeves EP (2007) Insect and mammalian innate immune responses are much alike. Microbe 2:596–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp MW, Massey RC (2007) The use of insect models to study human pathogens. Drug Discov Today: Dis Models 4:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrell DA, Beutler B (2001) The evolution and genetics of innate immunity. Nature 2:256–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maki J, Yanagisawa T (1985) Anthelmintic effects of bithionol, paromomycin sulphate, flubendazole and mebendazole on mature and immature Hymenolepis nana in mice. J Helminthol 59:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansur F, Luoga W, Buttle DJ, Duce IR, Lowe A, Behnke JM (2014) The anthelmintic efficacy of natural plant cysteine proteinases against two rodent cestodes Hymenolepis diminuta and Hymenolepis microstoma in vitro. Vet Parasitol 201:48–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken RO, Lipkowitz KB, Dronen NO (1992) Efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole against Hymenolepis microstoma and Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitol Res 78:108–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKellar QA, Jackson F (2004) Veterinary anthelmintics: old and new trends. Parasitol 20:456–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • nc3rs (2014) What are the 3Rs? http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/the-3rs. Accessed 11/11/2014 2014

  • Novak M, Evans W (1978) The effect of mebendazole on different developmental stages of Hymenolepis diminuta cysticercoids. Can J Zool 56:604–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pursall ER, Rolff J (2011) Immune responses accelerate ageing: proof-of-principle in an insect model. PLoS One 6:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuppli CA, Fraser D, McDonald M (2004) Expanding the three Rs to meet new challenges in humane animal experimentation. Altern Lab Anim 32:525–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scully LR, Bidochka MJ (2006) Developing insect models for the study of current and emerging human pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 263:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinert M, Leippe M, Roeder T (2003) Surrogate hosts: protozoa and invertebrates as models for studying pathogen-host interactions. Int J Med Microbiol 293:321–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanowitz HB, Weiss LM, Wittner MD (2001) Tapeworms. Curr Infect Dis Rep 3:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Gönnert R (1977) The efficacy of praziquantel against cestodes in animals. Parasitol Res 52:117–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varma T, Shinghal T, Saxena M, Ahluwalia S (1989) Studies on the comparative efficacy of mebendazole, flubendazole and niclosamide against human tapeworm infections. Indian J Public Health 34:163–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a starting grant from the programme “Synergy in Human and Animal Research (SHARE)” at the University of Copenhagen and a research grant (no. 00007457) from the Villum Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Danish Experimental Animal Inspectorate permission no. 2010/561-1914—section C10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian David Woolsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woolsey, I.D., Fredensborg, B.L., Jensen, P.M. et al. An insect–tapeworm model as a proxy for anthelminthic effects in the mammalian host. Parasitol Res 114, 2777–2780 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4477-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4477-0

Keywords

Navigation