Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemiological implications of the use of various methods for the diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis in dogs with different characteristics and in differing prevalence scenarios

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to establish the influence on the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis (CanL) of the following: (1) the use of different diagnostic techniques; (2) different positivity thresholds; (3) selection of animals either at random from a population or focused on symptomatic individuals, (4) the function which the dog performs; and (5) scenarios with differing epidemiological characteristic. Three groups of dogs were analysed (416 sampled at random from an endemic area, 71 with symptomatology compatible with CanL and 15 from a non-endemic area) using three serological techniques (indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT), Kalazar DetectTM and Q Letitest ELISA) and a PCR-ELISA. The diagnostic technique had a considerable influence on the CanL prevalence value obtained. Uncertain antibody titres were more representative in dogs sampled at random and with the IFAT technique. Although employing different capture antigens, correlation of results was higher between the two commercial techniques in the group of dogs with symptomatology compatible with CanL. The sensitivity and specificity values of the different diagnostic techniques were affected by the epidemiological characteristic of the area under study, the presence of clinical signs and the function which the dog performs. This must be taken into account when comparing endemicity in different geographical areas, such as in studies carried out for the construction of risk maps. Using more than one technique, and adopting the criterion of considering an animal to be positive only when it has been diagnosed as such by more than one technique, considerably raises the prevalence values but maintains the differences between areas with different characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abranches P, Santos-Gomes G, Rachamim N, Campino L, Schnur LF, Jaffe CL (1991) An experimental model for canine visceral leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunol 13:537–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acedo-Sánchez C, Martín-Sánchez J, Vélez-Bernal ID, Sanchís-Marín MC, Louassini M, Maldonado JA, Morillas-Márquez F (1996) Leishmaniasis eco-epidemiology in the Alpujarra Region (Granada Province, southern Spain). Int J Parasitol 25:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acedo-Sánchez C, Morillas-Márquez F, Sanchíz-Marín MC, Martín-Sánchez J (1998) Changes in antibody titres against Leishmania infantum in naturally infected dogs in southern Spain. Vet Parasitol 75:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adel A, Saegerman C, Speybroeck N, Praet N, Victor B, De-Deken R, Soukehal A, Berkvens D (2010) Canine leishmaniasis in Algeria: true prevalence and diagnostic test characteristics in groups of dogs of different functional type. Vet Parasitol 172:204–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvar J, Cañavate C, Molina R, Moreno J, Nieto J (2004) Canine leishmaniasis. Adv Parasitol 57:1–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford DA, Bozza M, Freire M, Miranda JC, Sherlock I, Eulalio C, Lopes U, Fernandes O, Degrave W, Barker RH Jr, Badaro R, David JR (1995) Comparison of the polymerase chain reaction and serology for the detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis. AmJTrop Med Hyg 53:251–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baneth G, Koutinas AF, Solano-Gallego L, Bourdeau P, Ferrer L (2008) Canine leishmaniosis—new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part one. Trends Parasitol 24:324–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral M, O’Grady J, Alexander J (1992) Demonstration of Leishmania specific cell mediated and humoral immunity in asymptomatic dogs. Parasite Immunol 14:531–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carrera L, Fermín ML, Tesouro M, García P, Rollán E, González JL, Méndez S, Cuquerella M, Alunda JM (1996) Antibody response in dogs experimentally infected with Leishmania infantum: infection course antigen markers. Exp Parasitol 82:139–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chappuis F, Rijal S, Soto A, Menten J, Boelaert M (2006) A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the direct agglutination test and rK39 dipstick for visceral leishmaniasis. BMJ 333:723–726. doi:10.1136/bmj.38917.503056.7C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de-Assis TS, Braga ASC, Pedras MJ, Oliveira E, Barral A, de-Siqueira IC, Costa CH, Costa DL, Holanda TA, Soares VY, Biá M, Caldas-Ade J, Romero GA, Rabello A (2011) Multi-centric prospective evaluation of rk39 rapid test and direct agglutination test for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Trans R Soc Med Trop Hyg 105:81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Espiñeira MM, Slappendel RJ (1997) A case of autochthonous canine leishmaniasis in the Netherlands. Vet Q 19:69–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan N, Ozbel Y, Toz SO, Dinleyici EC, Bor O (2005) Sero-epidemiological survey on canine visceral leishmaniasis and the distribution of sandfly vectors in northwestern Turkey: prevention strategies for childhood visceral leishmaniasis. J Trop Pediatr 52:212–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Pérez FJ, Méndez S, de-la-Fuente C, Gómez-Muñoz MT, Cuquerella M, Alunda JM (1999) Short report: improved diagnosis and follow-up of canine leishmaniasis using amastigote-based indirect immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hig 61:652–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferroglio E, Centaro E, Mignone W, Trisciuoglio A (2007) Evaluation of an ELISA rapid device for the serological diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dog as compared with immunofluorescence assay and Western blot. Vet Parasitol 144:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisa R, Gállego M, Castillejo S, Aisa MJ, Serra T, Riera C, Carrió J, Gállego J, Portús M (1999) Epidemiology of canine leishmaniosis in Catalonia (Spain). The example of the Priorat focus. Vet Parasitol 83:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franco AO, Davies CR, Mylne A, Dedet JP, Gállego M, Ballart C, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L, Molina R, Gálvez R, Morillas-Márquez F, Barón-López S, Pires CA, Afonso MO, Ready PD, Cox J (2011) Predicting the distribution of canine leishmaniasis in western Europe based on environmental variables. Parasitology 14:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez R, Miró G, Descalzo MA, Nieto J, Dado D, Martín O, Cubero E, Molina R (2010) Emerging trends in the seroprevalence of canine leishmaniasis in the Madrid region (central Spain). Vet Parasitol 169:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iniesta L, Fernández-Barredo S, Bulle B, Gómez MT, Piarroux R, Gállego M, Alunda JM, Portús M (2002) Diagnostic techniques to detect cryptic leishmaniasis in dogs. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1137–1141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lepe JA, Ubeda JM, Morillas F, Guevara DC, Martín-Sánchez J, Guerrero FJ, Sanchís-Marín MC, Perea R (2000) Epidemiology of the leishmaniosis in the nature reserve of Sierra de Aracena and Picos de Aroche (southwest Spain). Res Rev Parasitol 60:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Maia C, Campino L (2008) Methods for diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis and immune response to infection. Vet Parasitol 158:274–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancianti F, Pedonese F, Poli A (1996) Evaluation of dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (dot-ELISA) for the serodiagnosis of canine leishmaniosis as compared with indirect immunofluorescence assay. Vet Parasitol 65:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Sánchez J, López-López MC, Acedo-Sánchez C, Castro-Fajardo JJ, Pineda JA, Morillas-Márquez F (2001) Diagnosis of infections with Leishmania infantum using PCR-ELISA. Parasitology 122:607–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Sánchez J, Gramiccia M, Di Muccio T, Ludovisi A, Morillas-Márquez F (2004) Isoenzymatic polymorphism of Leishmania infantum in southern Spain. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hig 98:228–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Sánchez J, Morales-Yuste M, Acedo-Sánchez C, Barón S, Díaz V, Morillas-Márquez F (2009) Canine leishmaniasis in southeastern Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 15:795–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Deplazes P (1995) PCR and in vitro cultivation for detection of Leishmania spp. in diagnostic samples from human and dogs. J Clin Microbiol 33:1145–1149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miró G, Montoya A, Mateo M, Alonso A, García S, García A, Caballero MJ, Molina R (2007) A leishmaniosis surveillance system among stray dogs in the region of Madrid: ten years of serodiagnosis (1996-2006). Parasitol Res 101:253–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miró G, Cardoso L, Pennisi MG, Oliva G, Baneth G (2008) Canine leishmaniosis—new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part two. Trends Parasitol 24:371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohebali M, Taran M, Zarei Z (2004) Rapid detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs: comparative study using an immunochromatographic dipstick rk39 test and direct agglutination. Vet Parasitol 121:239–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina R, Amela C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Alvar J (1994) Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88:491–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro-de-Andrade H, Barbosa-Reis A, Lopes-dos-Santos S, Volpini AC, Marques MJ, Romanha AJ (2006) Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs. Vet Parasitol 140:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morillas F, Sánchez-Rabasco F, Ocaña J, Martín-Sánchez J, Ocaña-Wihelmi J, Acedo C, Sanchís-Marín MC (1996) Leishmaniosis in the focus of the Axarquía region, Malaga province, southern Spain: a survey of the human, dog and vector. Parasitol Res 82:569–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morillas-Márquez F, Martín-Sánchez J, Acedo C, Sanchís-Marín MC (1995) Importancia actual de las leishmaniosis en España. Ars Pharm 36:19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto CG, García-Alonso M, Requena JM, Mirón C, Soto M, Alonso C, Navarrete I (1999) Analysis of the humoral immune response against total and recombinant antigens of Leishmania infantum: correlation with disease progression in canine experimental leishmaniasis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 67:117–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otranto D, Paradies P, Sasanelli M, Brandonisio O (2004) Rapid immunochromatographic test for serodiagnosis of canine leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol 42:2769–2770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otranto D, Paradies P, de Caprariis D, Stanneck D, Testini G, Grimm F, Deplazes P, Capelli G (2009) Toward diagnosing Leishmania infantum infection in asymptomatic dogs in an area where leishmaniasis is endemic. Clin Vacc Immunol 16:337–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozerdem D, Eroglu F, Genc A, Demirkazik M, Koltas IS (2009) Comparison of microscopic examination, rK39, and PCR for visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis in Turkey. Parasitol Res 106:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porrozzi R, Santos-da-Costa MV, Teva A, Falqueto A, Ferreira AL, dos-Santos CD, Fernandes AP, Gazzinelli RT, Campos-Neto A, Grimaldi G (2007) Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays based on crude and recombinant leishmanial antigens for serodiagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic Leishmania infantum visceral infections in dogs. Clin Vacc Immunol 14:544–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O, Davidson S, Garcez L, Lambson B, Ramos P, Shaw MA, Dye C (2001) Detection of Leishmania infantum by PCR, serology and cellular immune response in a cohort study of Brazilian dogs. Parasitology 122:253–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O, Garcez LM, Kaye PM, Shaw MA, Dye C, Day MJ (2003) IgG subclass responses in a longitudinal study of canine visceral leishmaniasis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 91:161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reithinger R, Quinnell RJ, Alexander B, Davies CR (2002) Rapid detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs: comparative study using an immunochromatographic dipstick tect, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 40:2352–2356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Cortés A, Ojeda A, López-Fuertes L, Timón M, Altet L, Solano-Gallego L, Sánchez-Robert E, Francino O, Alberola J (2007) A long term experimental study of canine visceral leishmaniasis. Int J Parasitol 37:683–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solano-Gallego L, Riera C, Roura X, Iniesta L, Gallego M, Valladares JE, Fisa R, Castillejo S, Alberola J, Ferrer L, Arboix M, Portús M (2001) Leishmania infantum-specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 antibody responses in healthy and ill dogs from endemic areas. Evolution in the course of infection and after treatment. Vet Parasitol 96:265–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto M, Requena JM, Quijada L, Alonso C (1998) Multicomponent chimeric antigen for serodiagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol 36:58–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srividya G, Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Salotra P (2011) Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: developments over the last decade. Parasitol Res. doi:10.1007/s00436-011-2680-1

  • WHO (1984) La leishmaniosis. Serie de Informes Técnicos no. 793. Geneva.

  • WHO (2010) Control of the leishmaniases. Report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, 22–26 March 2010. WHO Technical Report Series no 949. Geneva. pp 1-186

  • WHO (2011) Visceral leishmaniosis rapid diagnostic test performance. Diagnostics evaluation series no 4. WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Geneva pp 1-44

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the “Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia” (Madrid, Spain) by the Projects AGL2004-06909-C02-02/GAN and CGL2007-66943-C02-02/BOS and to the “Junta de Andalucia” (Sevilla, Spain) by subsidising the group CVI176.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that all experiments included in this article comply with the current laws of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Manuel Morales-Yuste, Francisco Morillas-Márquez, Victoriano Díaz-Sáez, Sergio Barón-López & Joaquina Martín-Sánchez

  2. Veterinarian laboratory analysis ANLAVE, Granada, Spain

    Carmen Acedo-Sánchez

Authors
  1. Manuel Morales-Yuste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Morillas-Márquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victoriano Díaz-Sáez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Barón-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carmen Acedo-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joaquina Martín-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquina Martín-Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morales-Yuste, M., Morillas-Márquez, F., Díaz-Sáez, V. et al. Epidemiological implications of the use of various methods for the diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis in dogs with different characteristics and in differing prevalence scenarios. Parasitol Res 111, 155–164 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2812-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2812-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation