Field evaluation of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical repellent, against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand


The potential of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical product, as a repellent against natural mosquito populations was evaluated in comparison to commercial (Insect Block 28) and standard (25% DEET) repellents in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. These repellent products afforded encouragingly excellent personal protection against a broad range of mosquito species belonging to various genera, including Aedes, Anopheles, Armigeres, Culex, and Mansonia. No mosquito bite was observed on the volunteers treated with G10 and Insect Block 28 throughout the field study, whereas two species, i.e., six A. barbirostris and two A. subalbatus, came to bite or land on 25% DEET-treated volunteers. Thus, it can be concluded that while G10 and Insect Block 28 exhibited similarly powerful repellent activities with complete (100%) protection, 25% DEET was effective in minimizing bites with 99.68% protection. G10 formula was also studied for physical properties and biological stability after being kept under two conditions; a heating and cooling cycle, and varying temperature and time storage. Most samples of stored G10 not only demonstrated a similarity in appearance and physical properties, but also provided comparable repellency to that of the fresh preparation. These findings encourage commercial development of G10 formula as an alternative to conventional synthetic repellents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Badolo A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E, Ouédraogo AP, Costantini C (2004) Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023. Trop Med Int Health 9:330–334

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisset NG (1994) Herbal drugs and phytopharmaceuticals: A handbook for practice on a scientific basis. Medpharm, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cetin H, Erler F, Yanikoglu A (2004) Larvicidal activity of a botanical natural product, AkseBio2, against Culex pipiens. Fitoterapia 75:724–728

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fradin MS, Day JF (2002) Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med 347:13–18

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frances SP, Wirtz RA (2005) Repellents: past, present, and future. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 21:1–3

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frances SP, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Eamsila C (1993) Response of Anopheles dirus and Aedes albopictus to repellents in the laboratory. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 9:474–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frances SP, Klein TA, Hildebrandt DW, Burge R, Noigamol C, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Wirtz RA (1996) Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents DEET, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. J Med Entomol 33:511–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frances SP, Cooper RD, Sweeney AW (1998) Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents DEET, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia. J Med Entomol 35:690–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frances SP, Cooper RD, Popat S, Beebe NW (2001) Field evaluation of repellents containing DEET and AI3-37220 against Anopheles koliensis in Papua New Guinea. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 17:42–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frances SP, Waterson DGE, Beebe NW, Cooper RD (2004) Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing DEET and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia. J Med Entomol 41:414–417

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Golenda CF, Solberg VB, Burge R, Gambel JM, Wirtz RA (1999) Gender-related efficacy difference to an extended duration formulation of topical N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Am J Trop Med Hyg 60:654–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Isman MB (2006) Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol 51:45–66

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamsuk K, Choochote W, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2007) Effectiveness of Zanthoxylum piperitum-derived essential oil as an alternative repellent under laboratory and field applications. Parasitol Res 100:339–345

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Limsuwan S, Rongsriyam Y, Kerdpibule V, Apiwathnasorn C, Chiang GL, Cheong WH (1987) Rearing techniques for mosquitoes. In: Sucharit S, Supavej S (eds) Practical entomology. Malaria and filariasis. 1st edn. Museum and Reference Centre, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson C, Coats J (2001) Insect repellents—past, present and future. Pestic Outlook 12:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rafikali AM, Muraleednaran GN (2001) Mosquitocidal, nematocidal and antifungal compounds from Apium graveolens L. seeds. J Agric Food Chem 49:142–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rattanarithikul R, Panthusiri P (1994) Illustrated keys to the medically important mosquitos of Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 25(Suppl 1):1–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreck CE (1985) The status of DEET (N, N diethyl-m-toluamide) as a repellent for Anopheles albimanus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1:98–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaalan E, Canyon D, Faried MW, Abdel-Wahab H, Mansour A (2005) A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ Int 31:1149–1166

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma VP, Ansari MA (1994) Personal protection from mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) by burning neem oil in kerosene. J Med Entomol 31:505–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sukumar K, Perich MJ, Boobar LR (1991) Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 7:210–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka K, Mizusawa K, Saugstad E (1979) Mosquitoes of Japan and Korea. Contrib Am Entomol Inst 16:987

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tuetun B, Choochote W, Rattanachanpichai E, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2004) Mosquito repellency of the seeds of celery (Apium graveolens L.). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 98:407–417

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuetun B, Choochote W, Kanjanapothi D, Rattanachanpichai E, Chaithong U, Chaiwong P, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2005) Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions. Trop Med Int Health 10:1190–1198

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuetun B, Choochote W, Pongpaibul Y, Junkum A, Kanjanapothi D, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2008) Celery-based topical repellents as a potential natural alternative for personal protection against mosquitoes. Parasitol Res (in press). doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1167-1

  26. WHO (1996) Report of the WHO informal consultation on the evaluation and testing of insecticides. CTD/WHOPES/IC/96.1, Control of Tropical Diseases Division. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yap HH, Jahangir K, Chong ASC, Adanan CR, Chong NL, Malik YA, Rohaizat B (1998) Field efficacy of a new repellent, KBR 3023, against Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) in a tropical environment. J Vector Ecol 23:62–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu J, Zeng X, O’Neal M, Schultz G, Tucker B, Coats J, Bartholomay L, Xue RD (2008) Mosquito larvicidal activity of botanical-based mosquito repellents. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 24:161–168

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful to the individuals who served as subject volunteers. Financial support from the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0112/2547) and the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of interest statement

The author(s) declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Pitasawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuetun, B., Choochote, W., Pongpaibul, Y. et al. Field evaluation of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical repellent, against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. Parasitol Res 104, 515–521 (2009).

Download citation


  • Mosquito Species
  • Mosquito Population
  • Deet
  • Biological Stability
  • Propylparaben