The potential of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical product, as a repellent against natural mosquito populations was evaluated in comparison to commercial (Insect Block 28) and standard (25% DEET) repellents in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. These repellent products afforded encouragingly excellent personal protection against a broad range of mosquito species belonging to various genera, including Aedes, Anopheles, Armigeres, Culex, and Mansonia. No mosquito bite was observed on the volunteers treated with G10 and Insect Block 28 throughout the field study, whereas two species, i.e., six A. barbirostris and two A. subalbatus, came to bite or land on 25% DEET-treated volunteers. Thus, it can be concluded that while G10 and Insect Block 28 exhibited similarly powerful repellent activities with complete (100%) protection, 25% DEET was effective in minimizing bites with 99.68% protection. G10 formula was also studied for physical properties and biological stability after being kept under two conditions; a heating and cooling cycle, and varying temperature and time storage. Most samples of stored G10 not only demonstrated a similarity in appearance and physical properties, but also provided comparable repellency to that of the fresh preparation. These findings encourage commercial development of G10 formula as an alternative to conventional synthetic repellents.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Badolo A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E, Ouédraogo AP, Costantini C (2004) Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023. Trop Med Int Health 9:330–334
Bisset NG (1994) Herbal drugs and phytopharmaceuticals: A handbook for practice on a scientific basis. Medpharm, Stuttgart
Cetin H, Erler F, Yanikoglu A (2004) Larvicidal activity of a botanical natural product, AkseBio2, against Culex pipiens. Fitoterapia 75:724–728
Fradin MS, Day JF (2002) Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med 347:13–18
Frances SP, Wirtz RA (2005) Repellents: past, present, and future. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 21:1–3
Frances SP, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Eamsila C (1993) Response of Anopheles dirus and Aedes albopictus to repellents in the laboratory. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 9:474–476
Frances SP, Klein TA, Hildebrandt DW, Burge R, Noigamol C, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Wirtz RA (1996) Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents DEET, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. J Med Entomol 33:511–515
Frances SP, Cooper RD, Sweeney AW (1998) Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents DEET, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia. J Med Entomol 35:690–694
Frances SP, Cooper RD, Popat S, Beebe NW (2001) Field evaluation of repellents containing DEET and AI3-37220 against Anopheles koliensis in Papua New Guinea. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 17:42–44
Frances SP, Waterson DGE, Beebe NW, Cooper RD (2004) Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing DEET and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia. J Med Entomol 41:414–417
Golenda CF, Solberg VB, Burge R, Gambel JM, Wirtz RA (1999) Gender-related efficacy difference to an extended duration formulation of topical N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Am J Trop Med Hyg 60:654–657
Isman MB (2006) Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol 51:45–66
Kamsuk K, Choochote W, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2007) Effectiveness of Zanthoxylum piperitum-derived essential oil as an alternative repellent under laboratory and field applications. Parasitol Res 100:339–345
Limsuwan S, Rongsriyam Y, Kerdpibule V, Apiwathnasorn C, Chiang GL, Cheong WH (1987) Rearing techniques for mosquitoes. In: Sucharit S, Supavej S (eds) Practical entomology. Malaria and filariasis. 1st edn. Museum and Reference Centre, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Peterson C, Coats J (2001) Insect repellents—past, present and future. Pestic Outlook 12:154–158
Rafikali AM, Muraleednaran GN (2001) Mosquitocidal, nematocidal and antifungal compounds from Apium graveolens L. seeds. J Agric Food Chem 49:142–145
Rattanarithikul R, Panthusiri P (1994) Illustrated keys to the medically important mosquitos of Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 25(Suppl 1):1–66
Schreck CE (1985) The status of DEET (N, N diethyl-m-toluamide) as a repellent for Anopheles albimanus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1:98–100
Shaalan E, Canyon D, Faried MW, Abdel-Wahab H, Mansour A (2005) A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ Int 31:1149–1166
Sharma VP, Ansari MA (1994) Personal protection from mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) by burning neem oil in kerosene. J Med Entomol 31:505–507
Sukumar K, Perich MJ, Boobar LR (1991) Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 7:210–237
Tanaka K, Mizusawa K, Saugstad E (1979) Mosquitoes of Japan and Korea. Contrib Am Entomol Inst 16:987
Tuetun B, Choochote W, Rattanachanpichai E, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2004) Mosquito repellency of the seeds of celery (Apium graveolens L.). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 98:407–417
Tuetun B, Choochote W, Kanjanapothi D, Rattanachanpichai E, Chaithong U, Chaiwong P, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2005) Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions. Trop Med Int Health 10:1190–1198
Tuetun B, Choochote W, Pongpaibul Y, Junkum A, Kanjanapothi D, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Riyong D, Pitasawat B (2008) Celery-based topical repellents as a potential natural alternative for personal protection against mosquitoes. Parasitol Res (in press). doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1167-1
WHO (1996) Report of the WHO informal consultation on the evaluation and testing of insecticides. CTD/WHOPES/IC/96.1, Control of Tropical Diseases Division. WHO, Geneva
Yap HH, Jahangir K, Chong ASC, Adanan CR, Chong NL, Malik YA, Rohaizat B (1998) Field efficacy of a new repellent, KBR 3023, against Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) in a tropical environment. J Vector Ecol 23:62–68
Zhu J, Zeng X, O’Neal M, Schultz G, Tucker B, Coats J, Bartholomay L, Xue RD (2008) Mosquito larvicidal activity of botanical-based mosquito repellents. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 24:161–168
The authors are grateful to the individuals who served as subject volunteers. Financial support from the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0112/2547) and the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflicts of interest statement
The author(s) declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Tuetun, B., Choochote, W., Pongpaibul, Y. et al. Field evaluation of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical repellent, against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. Parasitol Res 104, 515–521 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1224-9
- Mosquito Species
- Mosquito Population
- Biological Stability