Ommatidia of blow fly, house fly, and flesh fly: implication of their vision efficiency

Abstract

This work aims to elucidate the number of ommatidia or facets (the outwardly visible units of each ommatidium) for compound eyes in blow flies [Chrysomya megacephala (F.), Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart), Chrysomya nigripes (Aubertin), Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann)], house flies (Musca domestica L.), and flesh flies (Liosarcophaga dux Thomson) by manual counts of the corneal spreads. The head of the fly in each species was soaked in 20% potassium hydroxide solution at room temperature for 7 days, and the clear compound eye was dissected into six small parts, each of which was placed onto a slide and flattened using a coverslip. Images of each part were obtained using a microscope connected to a computer. The printed images of each part were magnified, and the total number of ommatidia per eye was manually counted. For males, the mean number of ommatidia was statistically different among all flies examined: L. dux (6,032) > C. rufifacies (5,356) > C. nigripes (4,798) > C. megacephala (4,376) > L. cuprina (3,665) > M. domestica (3,484). Likewise, the mean number of facets in females was statistically different: L. dux (6,086) > C. megacephala (5,641) > C. rufifacies (5,208) > C. nigripes (4,774) > L. cuprina (3,608) > M. domestica (3433). Scanning electron microscopy analysis of adult flies revealed the sexual dimorphism in the compound eye. Male C. megacephala had large ommatidia in the upper two thirds part and small ommatidia in the lower one third part, whereas only small ommatidia were detected in females. Dense postulate appearance was detected in the external surface of the corneal lens of the ommatidia of C. megacephala, C. rufifacies, and C. nigripes, while a mix of dense postulate appearance and variable groove array length was detected in L. cuprina and M. domestica. The probable functions of ommatidia are discussed with reference to other literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Altner I, Burkhardt D (1981) Fine structure of the ommatidia and the occurrence of rhabdomeric twist in the dorsal eye of male Bibio marci (Diptera, Nematocera, Bibionidae). Cell Tissue Res 215:607–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson GS (2001) Insect succession on carrion and its relationship to determining time of death. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL (eds) Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 143–175

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson MS, Gaimari SD (2003) Raman-atomic force microscopy of the ommatidial surfaces of Dipteran compound eyes. J Struct Biol 142:364–368

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker GT, Ma PWK (2006) Morphology and number of ommatidia in the compound eyes of Solenopsis invicta, Solenopsis richteri, and their hybrid (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zool Anz 245:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernhard CG, Gemne G, Sällström Z (1970) Comparative ultrastructure of corneal surface topography in insects with considerations on phylogeny and function. Z Vergl Physiol 67:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bidawid SP, Edeson JF, Ibrahim J, Matossian RM (1978) The role of non-biting flies in the transmission of enteric pathogens (Salmonella species and Shigella species) in Beirut, Lebanon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 72:117–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bitsakos K, Fermüller C (2006) Depth estimation using the compound eye of dipteran flies. Biol Cybern 95:487–501

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blaney WM (1977) How insects live. Galley Press, England, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buschbeck EK (2005) The compound lens eye of Strepsiptera: morphological development of larvae and pupae. Arthropod Struct Dev 34:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrd JH, Castner JL (2001) Insects of forensic importance. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL (eds) Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. CRC, Florida, pp 43–79

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chapman RF (1998) The insects structure and function,4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crosskey RW (1993) Blackflies (Simuliidae). In: Lane RP, Crosskey RW (eds) Medical insects and arachnids. British Museum (Natural History), London, pp 241–287

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dander U, Jander R (1994) Numerical allometric growth of the ommatidia, antennal sensilla, and teeth of foretibial combs in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus Dallas (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 23:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dey S, Dkhar B (1992) An unusual type of corneal nipple in the earwig, Forficula sp., with a possible anti-reflection role. Micron Microsc Acta 23:337–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elzinga RJ (2004) Fundamentals of entomology, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, p 512

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goff ML (2000) A fly for the prosecution: how insect evidence helps solve crimes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 225

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenberg B (1971) Flies and disease. Vol. I. Ecology, classification and biotic associations. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greenberg B (1973) Flies and disease. Vol. II. Biological and disease transmission. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg B, Kunich JC (2002) Entomology and the law. Flies as forensic indicators. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jander U, Jander R (2002) Allometry and resolution of bee eyes (Apoidea). Arthropod Struct Dev 30:179–193

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klotz JH, Reid BL, Gordon WC (1992) Variation of ommatidia number as a function of worker size in Camponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc 39:233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lertthamnongtham S, Sukontason KL, Sukontason K, Piangjai S, Choochote W, Vogtsberger RC, Olson JK (2003) Seasonal fluctuations in populations of the two most forensically important fly species in northern Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 97:87–91

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer-Rochow VB, Mishra M (2007) Structure and putative function of dark- and light-adapted as well as UV-exposed eyes of the food store pest Psyllipsocus ramburi Sélys-Longchamps (Insecta: Psocoptera: Psylippsocidae). J Insect Physiol 53:157–169

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mishra M, Meyer-Rochow VB (2006) Fine structure of the compound eye of the fungus beetle Neotriplax lewisi (Coleoptera, Cucujiformis, Erotylidae). Invert Biol 125:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards OW, Davies RG (1977) Imms' general textbook of entomology: structure, physiology and development, 10th edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Romoser WS, Stoffolano JGJ (1994) The science of entomology, 3rd edn. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shinonaga S (1965) The altitudinal distribution of flies on Mt. Fuji in summer season. Jpn J Sanit Zool 16:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith KGV (1986) A manual of forensic entomology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sucharit S, Tumrasvin W, Vutikes S (1976) A survey on house flies in Bangkok and neighboring provinces. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 7:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sukontason K, Sukontason KL, Piangjai S, Tippanun J, Lertthamnongtham S, Vogtsberger RC, Olson JK (2003) Survey of forensically-relevant fly species in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand. J Vector Ecol 28:135–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sukontason K, Sukontason KL, Ngern-klun R, Sripakdee D, Piangjai S (2004) Differentiation of the third instar of forensically important fly species in Thailand. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:1069–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sukontason K, Narongchai P, Kanchai C, Vichairat K, Sribanditmongkol P, Bhoopat T, Kurahashi H, Chockjamsai M, Piangjai S, Bunchu N, Vongvivach S, Samai W, Chaiwong T, Methanitikorn R, Ngern-klun R, Sripakdee D, Boonsriwong W, Siriwattanarungsee S, Srimuangwong C, Hanterdsith B, Chaiwan K, Srisuwan C, Upakut S, Moopayak K, Vogtsberger RC, Olson JK, Sukontason KL (2007a) Forensic entomology cases in Thailand: a review of cases from 2000 to 2006. Parasitol Res 101:1417–1423

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sukontason KL, Bunchoo M, Khantawa B, Piangjai S, Rongsriyam Y, Sukontason K (2007b) Comparison between Musca domestica and Chrysomya megacephala as carriers of bacteria in northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 38:38–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sukontason K, Methanitikorn R, Kurahashi H, Vogtsberger RC, Sukontason KL (2008) External morphology of Chrysomya pinguis (Walker) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Micron 39:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  35. Talarico F, Romeo M, Massolo A, Brandmayr P, Zetto T (2007) Morphometry and eye morphology in three species of Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in relation to habitat demands. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tan SW, Yap KL, Lee HL (1997) Mechanical transport of rotavirus by the legs and wings of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). J Med Entomol 34:527–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tumrasvin W, Sucharit S, Kano R (1978) Studies on medically important flies in Thailand. IV. Altitudinal distribution of flies belonging to Muscidae and Calliphoridae in Doi Indhanondh Mountain, Chiengmai, in early summer season. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 25:77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wada S (1974) Spezielle randzonale ommatidien von Calliphora Erythrocephala meig. (diptera calliphoridae): Architektur der zentralen rhabdomeren-kolumne und topographie im komplexauge. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 3:397–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yack JE, Johnson SE, Brown SG, Warrant EJ (2007) The eyes of Macrosoma sp. (Lepidoptera: Hedyloidea): a nocturnal butterfly with superposition optics. Arthropod Struct Dev 36:11–22

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang IF, Lin JT, Wu CY (1998) Fine structure of the compound eye of Mallada basalis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ziemba SK, Rutowski RL (2000) Sexual dimorphism in eye morphology in a butterfly (Asterocampa leila; Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Psyche 103:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zumpt F (1965) Myiasis in man and animals in the old world. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work received support by grants from the Natth’s Bhamarapravati’s fund and the Thailand Research Fund (RMU4980007). We thank the Faculty of Medicine and Chiang Mai University for funding printing costs.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kabkaew L. Sukontason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sukontason, K.L., Chaiwong, T., Piangjai, S. et al. Ommatidia of blow fly, house fly, and flesh fly: implication of their vision efficiency. Parasitol Res 103, 123–131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-0939-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Musca Domestica
  • Manual Count
  • Potassium Hydroxide Solution
  • Myiasis
  • Corneal Lens