Parasitology Research

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 357–364 | Cite as

Humoral immune responses during experimental infection with Fascioloides magna and Fasciola hepatica in goats and comparison of their excretory/secretory products

  • Adam NovobilskýEmail author
  • Martin Kašný
  • Libor Mikeš
  • Kamil Kovařčík
  • Břetislav Koudela
Original Paper


This study investigated the humoral immune responses of goats experimentally infected with Fascioloides magna and Fasciola hepatica to F. magna excretory/secretory products (FmESP) or F. hepatica excretory/secretory products (FhESP), respectively. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine serum antibody responses and for possible discrimination of F. magna and F. hepatica infections in goats. Comparison of ESPs of both flukes and evaluation of ESP antigenicity was also studied applying immunoblotting techniques. In all infected goats, antibody level was significantly increased (against negative control) since 2 weeks post infection (WPI). However, the dynamics of antibodies varied between F. magna and F. hepatica groups during the course of the infection. The cross-reaction of antibodies developed against F. magna and F. hepatica with ESP proteins was recorded by ELISA. The species-specific proteins 40, 120 kDa from FmESP and 80, 160 kDa from FhESP (with no antibody cross-reaction) were detected by two dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblot as the potential immunodiagnostic markers. Our results suggest that F. magna and F. hepatica infection could be distinguished by common immunological techniques based on species-specific antigen–antibodies interaction.


Echinococcus Granulosus Domestic Ruminant Fascioliasis Immunoblotting Technique Adult Fluke 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic project 524/03/H133, Grant of FRVŠ 805/G3/2005, by the research project MSM6215712403, and by the Grant Mze 0002716201. We thank Leoš Pavlata and L’ubica Mišurová (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic) for their help with the experiment. We also thank Daniel Rondelaud (University of Limoges, France) and Norman Baldwin (Baldwin Aquatics, Oregon, USA) for providing metacercariae. Our thanks are also expressed to “Schistosome Group Prague” at the Department of Parasitology (Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) and support from the Czech Ministry of Education (project Nos. MSM 0021620828 and MSM LC06009).


  1. Abdel-Rahman SM, O’Reily KL, Malone JB (1998) Evaluation of a diagnostic monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of a 26- to 28-kDa Fasciola hepatica coproantigens in cattle. Am J Vet Res 59:533–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biguet J, Capron A, Tran Van Ky P (1962) Les antigènes de Fasciola hepatica. Ann Parasitol 37:221–231Google Scholar
  3. Conboy GA, Stromberg BE (1991) Hematology and clinical pathology of experimental Fascioloides magna infection in cattle and guinea pigs. Vet Parasitol 40:241–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foreyt WJ (1990) Domestic sheep as a rare definitive host of the large American liver fluke Fascioloides magna. J Parasitol 76:736–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foreyt WJ, Hunter RL (1980) Clinical Fascioloides magna infection in sheep in Oregon on pasture shared by Columbian white-tailed deer. Am J Vet Res 41:1531–1532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Foreyt WJ, Leathers CW (1980) Experimental infection of domestic goats with Fascioloides magna. Am J Vet Res 41:883–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Foreyt WJ, Todd AC (1976) Development of the large American liver fluke Fascioloides magna in white-tailed deer, cattle and sheep. J Parasitol 62:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foreyt WJ, Todd AC (1979) Selected clinicopathologic changes associated with experimentally induced Fascioloides magna infection in white-tailed deer. J Wildl Dis 15:83–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fried B, Stromberg BE (1985) In vitro excystment of metacercariae of Fascioloides magna (Trematoda). J Parasitol 71:263–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths HJ (1962) Fascioloidiasis of cattle, sheep, and deer in northern Minnesota. J Am Vet Med Assoc 140:342–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillyer GV, Galanes MS (1988) Identification of a 17-kilodalton Fasciola hepatica immunodiagnostic antigen by the enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot technique. J Clin Microbiol 26:2048–2053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim K, Yang HJ, Chung YB (2003) Usefulness of 8 kDa protein of Fasciola hepatica in diagnosis of fascioliasis. Korean J Parasitol 41:121–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Korinkova K, Pavlickova Z, Kovarcik K, Koudela B (2006) Distribution of muscle larvae and antibody dynamics in goats experimentally infected with Trichinella spiralis. Parasitol Res 99:643–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CG, Zimmerman GL, Mulrooney DM (1992) Isoelectric focusing of soluble proteins from Fasciola hepatica L, 1758 and Fascioloides magna B, 1875. Am J Vet Res 53:246–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martínez A, Martínez-Cruz MS, Martínez FJ, Gutiérrez PN, Hernández S (1996) Detection of antibodies to Fasciola hepatica excretory–secretory antigens in experimentally infected goats by enzyme immunosorbent assay. Vet Parasitol 62:247–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez-Moreno A, Martínez-Moreno FJ, Acosta I, Gutiérrez PN, Becerra C, Hernández S (1997) Humoral and cellular immune responses to experimental Fasciola hepatica infections in goats. Parasitol Res 83:680–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pérez J, Martin de las Mulas J, Carrasco L, Gutierrez PN, Martínez-Cruz MS, Martínez-Moreno A (1999) Pathological and immunohistochemical study of the liver and hepatic lymph nodes in goats infected with one or more doses of Fasciola hepatica. J Comp Pathol 120:199–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poitou I, Baeza E, Boulard C (1992) Humoral and cellular immune responses in rats during a primary infestation with Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol 45:59–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qureshi T, Wagner GG, Drave DL, Davis DS, Craig TM (1995) Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot analysis of excretory–secretory proteins of Fascioloides magna and Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol 58:357–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reddington JJ, Leid RW, Wescott RB (1986) The susceptibility of the goat to Fasciola hepatica infections. Vet Parasitol 19:145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruiz A, Molina JM, Gonzáles J, Martínez-Moreno FJ, Gutiérrez PN, Martínez-Moreno A (2003) Humoral response (IgG) of goats experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica against cysteine proteinases of adult fluke. Vet Res 34:435–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Santiago N, Hillyer GV (1988) Antibody profiles by EITB and ELISA of cattle and sheep infected with Fasciola hepatica. J Parasitol 74:810–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sinclair IJ, Wassall DA (1988) Sero-diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica infections in cattle. Vet Parasitol 27:283–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Solano M, Ridley RK, Minocha HC (1991) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against excretory–secretory products of Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol 40:227–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stromberg BE, Conboy GA, Hayden DW, Schlotthauer JC (1985) Pathophysiologic effects of experimentally induced Fascioloides magna infection in sheep. Am J Vet Res 46:1637–1641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Swales WE (1935) The life cycle of Fascioloides magna (Bassi, 1875), the large liver fluke of ruminants in Canada with observations on the bionomics of the larval stages and the intermediate hosts, pathology of fascioloidiasis magna, and control measures. Can J Res 12:177–215Google Scholar
  27. Thienpont D, Rochete F, Vanprijs OF (1979) Diagnosing helminthiasis through coprological examination. Janssen Research Foundation, pp 180Google Scholar
  28. Torgerson P, Claxton J (1999) Epidemiology and control. In: Dalton JP (ed) Fasciolosis. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 113–149Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Novobilský
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Kašný
    • 2
  • Libor Mikeš
    • 2
  • Kamil Kovařčík
    • 3
  • Břetislav Koudela
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary Ecology and Environmental ProtectionUniversity of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical SciencesBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Parasitology, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPrague 2Czech Republic
  3. 3.Department of VirologyVeterinary Research InstituteBrnoCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of ParasitologyUniversity of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical SciencesBrnoCzech Republic
  5. 5.Institute of ParasitologyBiological Centre of the Czech Academy of SciencesČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations