Parasitology Research

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 329–332 | Cite as

Efficacy of neem seed extract shampoo on head lice of naturally infected humans in Egypt

  • Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar
  • Margit SemmlerEmail author
Original Paper


Sixty heavily lice-infested male and female children (4–15 years) were selected and subjected to the treatment with a neem seed extract shampoo. Twenty to thirty milliliter of the shampoo were thoroughly mixed with completely wet hair and rubbed in to reach the skin of the scalp. After 5, 10, 15 and 30 min, the shampoo was washed out and the hair basically combed. Head lice were collected and examined. The neem seed extract shampoo proved to be highly effective against all stages of head lice. No obvious differences regarding the efficacy of the shampoo were observed between an exposure time of 10, 15 or 30 min. No side effects, such as skin irritation, burning sensations, or red spots on the scalp, forehead or neck, respectively, were observed.


Malathion Carbaryl Skin Irritation Head Louse Pyrethroid Insecticide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anonymous (1975) Basic information about human lice. Pharmecs Div., Pfizer Inc., New York, p 12Google Scholar
  2. Bahamdan K, Mahfouz AA, Tallab T, Badawi IA, Al-Amari OM (1996) Skin diseases among adolescent boys in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Int J Dermatol 35:405–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baily AM, Prociv P (2000) Persistent head lice following multiple treatments: evidence for insecticide resistance in Pediculus humanus capitis. Australas J Dermatol 41:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. David JR, Brownson RC, Garcia R, Bentz BJ, Turner A (1993) Family pesticide use and childhood brain cancer. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 24:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahe A, Prual A, Konate M, Bobin P (1995) Skin disease of children in Mali: a public health problem. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 89:467–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mallis A (ed) (1990) Handbook of pest control, 7th edn. Franzak & Foster Co., ClevelandGoogle Scholar
  7. Pan American Health Organisation (PAHG) (1973) The control of lice and louse-borne diseases. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Control of Lice and Louse-borne diseases, Washington, D.C. Dec. 4–6, 1972. World Health Organisation, Washington, D.C. Scientific Publ. 263:311–320Google Scholar
  8. Pesticides News (1995) Household spray cancer link. Pesticide News 28:16Google Scholar
  9. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Armstrong P, Hahn C, Wolfe N, Rahman HA, Laserson K, Telford III SR, Spielman A (1999) Differential permethrin susceptibility of head lice sample in the US and Borneo. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 153:969–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Spielman A (2000) Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestations in North America. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:689–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Swadener C (1992) Low doses of malathion disrupt immune system function. J Pestic Reform 12:3Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency (EPA) (1997) Office of Pesticide Programs. List of chemicals evaluated for carcinogenic potential. Memo from W.L. Burnman, HED, to HED branch chiefs. Washington D.C. (Feb.19)Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency (EPA) (1981) EPAs recent bets. Science 218:3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentFaculty of Science Cairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations