Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Humoral immune reaction of newborn calves congenitally infected with Neospora caninum and experimentally treated with toltrazuril

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neospora caninum is widely recognized as one of the most important infectious organisms causing abortion and stillbirth in cattle. This parasite causes severe economical losses worldwide. Infection is mostly passed vertically from mother to calf during pregnancy. Under certain circumstances, an infection can lead to abortion, but in most cases it results in a chronically infected calf, which itself will represent the next endogenously infectious generation. So far, no reliable therapeutic or metaphylactic tool has been developed. One possibility to control the problem may consist of treating newborn calves that became vertically infected by a persistently infected mother. This may allow parasite-free offspring. The aim of the present study was to address the questions: (1) can serology be used to assess efficiency of treatment in toltrazuril-medicated animals? and (2) is a strategic prevention measure possible by means of producing N. caninum-free calves from positive cows? Calves from Neospora-seropositive cows and heifers were randomly split into two different medication groups: 36 calves were medicated with toltrazuril and 36 calves obtained a placebo. Medication (20 mg toltrazuril per kg bw) was administered three times, every second day, within the 7 days post natum. Three months after medication, there was no difference in antibody reactivity between the two groups. At later time points (4–6 months), however, significant differences were found, as explained by a strong humoral immunity after chemotherapeutical affection of parasites, while the placebo-treated animals only responded weakly to the persistent infection. In summary, we concluded that (1) serology was not an entirely appropriate tool to answer our initial question and (2) toltrazuril has the potential to eliminate N. caninum in newborn calves. As a consequence, we plan to follow up toltrazuril-medicated calves clinically and serologically over a longer period and investigate if they give birth to Neospora-free calves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The recommended dosage for Baycox 5% oral suspension to treat coccidiosis in cattle is 20 mg/kg once. Residue studies proved a withdrawal period of 63 days after single treatment.

References

  • Amman P, Waldvogel A, Breyer I, Esposito M, Müller N, Gottstein B (2004) The role of B- and T-cell immunity in toltrazuril-treated C57BL/6 WT, μMT and nude mice experimentally infected with Neospora caninum. Parasitol Res 93:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrianarivo A, Rowe G, Barr JD, Anderson BC, Packham ML, Sverlow AE, Choromanski KW, Loui L, Grace C, Conrad PA (2000) A POLYGEN(TM)-adjuvanted killed Neospora caninum tachyzoite preparation failed to prevent foetal infection in pregnant cattle following i.v./i.m. experimental tachyzoite challenge. Int J Parasitol 30:985–990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barling KS, Mcneill JW, Thompson JA, Paschal JC, Mccollum FT 3rd, Craig TM, Adams LG (2000) Association of serological status for Neospora caninum with postweaning weight gain and carcass measurements in beef calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 217:1361–1365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barling KS, Mcneill JW, Paschal JC, Mccollum FT 3rd, Craig TM, Adams LG, Thompson JA (2001) Ranch-management factors associated with antibody seropositivity for Neospora caninum in consignments of beef calves in Texas, USA. Prev Vet Med 52:53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darius AK, Mehlhorn H, Heydorn AO (2004) Effects of toltrazuril and ponazuril on Hammondia heydorni (syn. Nespora caninum) infections in mice. Parasitol Res 92:520–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP (2003) Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J Parasitol 41:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey JP, Lindsay DS (1996) A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis. Vet Parasitol 67:1–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eperon S, Brönnimann K, Hemphill A, Gottstein B (1999) Susceptibility of B-cell deficient C57BL/6 (μMT) mice to Neospora caninum infection. Parasite Immunol 21:225–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottstein B, Eperon S, Dai WJ, Cannas A, Hemphill A, Greif G (2001) Efficacy of toltrazuril and ponazuril against experimental Neospora caninum infection in mice. Parasitol Res 80:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottstein B, Razmi GR, Amman P, Sager, Müller N (2005) Toltrazuril treatment to control diaplacental Neospora caninum transmission in experimentally infected pregnant mice. Parasitology 130:41–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greif G (2000) Immunity to coccidiosis after treatment with toltrazuril. Parasitol Res 86:787–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greif G, Harder A, Haberkorn A (2001) Chemotherapeutic approaches to protozoa: Coccidiae—current level of knowledge and outlook. Parasitol Res 87:973–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haessig M, Gottstein B (2002) Epidemiological investigation of abortions due to Neospora caninum on Swiss dairy farms. Vet Rec 150:538–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder H, Haberkorn A (1989) Possible mode of action of toltrazuril: studies on two Eimeria species and Ascaris suum enzymes. Parasitol Res 76:8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez J, Risco C, Donovan A (2001) Association between exposure to Neospora caninum and mild production in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 219:632–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez J, Risco C, Donovan A (2002) Risk of abortion associated with Neospora caninum during different lactations and evidence of congenital transmission in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 221:1742–1746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Innes EA, Andrianarivo AG, Björkmann C, Williams DJ, Conrad PA (2002) Immune response to Neospora caninum and prospects for vaccination. Trends Parasitology 18:497–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JT, Park JY, Seo HS, Oh HG, Noh JW, Kim JH, Kim DY, Youn HJ (2002) In vitro antiprotozoal effect of artemisinin on Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 103:53–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzner S, Sager H, Blum J, Krebber R, Greif G, Gottstein B (2002) An explorative study to assess the efficacy of toltrazuril–sulfone (ponazuril) in calves experimentally infected with Neospora caninum. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 1:4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon HJ, Kim JH, Kim M, Lee JK, Hwang S, Kim DY (2003) Anti-parasitic activity of depudecin on Neospora caninum via the inhibition of histone deacetylase. Vet Parasitol 112:269–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay DS, Dubey JP (1989) Evaluation of anti-coccidial drugs’ inhibition of Neospora caninum development in cell cultures. J Parasitol 75:990–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay DS, Dubey JP (1990) Effects of sulfadiazine and amprolium on Neospora caninum (Protozoa: Apicomplexa) infections in mice. J Parasitol 76:177–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay DS, Rippey NS, Cole RA, Parsons LC, Dubey JP, Tidwell RR, Blagburn BL (1994) Examination of the activities of 43 chemotherapeutic agents against Neospora aninum tachyzoites in cultured cells. Am J Vet Res 55:976–981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM (1998) Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 28:1473–1478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhorn H, Ortmann-Falkenstein G, Haberkorn A (1984) The effects of sym. Triazinones on developmental stages of Eimeria tenella, Eimeria maxima and E. acervulina: a light and electron microscopical study. Z Parasitenkd 70:173–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SM, Zajac AM, Davis WL, Kennedy TJ, Lindsay DS (2005) The effects of ponazuril on development of apicomplexans in vitro. J Eukaryot Microbiol 52:231–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okeoma CM, Williamson NB, Pomroy WE, Stowell KM, Gillespie L (2004) The use of PCR to detect Neospora caninum DNA in the blood of naturally infected cows. Vet Parasitol 122:307–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sager H, Fischer I, Furrer K, Strasser M, Waldvogel A, Boerlin P, Audige L, Gottstein B (2001) A Swiss case-control study to assess Neospora caninum-associated bovine abortions by PCR, histopathology and serology. Vet Parasitol 102:1–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfelder S, Lucius R, Greif G, Pogonka T (2005) Treatment of mice with the anticoccidial drug Toltrazuril does not interfere with the development of a specific cellular intestinal immune response to Eimeria falciformis. Parasitol Res 97:458–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurmond MC, Hietala SK (1996) Culling associated with Neospora caninum infection in dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 57:1559–1562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurmond MC, Hietala SK (1997) Effect of Neospora caninum infection on milk production in first-lactation dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 210:672–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss R, Sager H, Müller N, Inderbitzin F, König M, Audigé L, Gottstein B (2000) Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen von Toxoplasma gondii und Neospora caninum unter fleischhygienischen Aspekten. Schweizer Arch Tierheilkd 142:95–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youn HJ, Lakritz J, Kim DY, Rottinghaus GE, Marsh AE (2003) Anti-protozoal efficacy of medicinal herb extracts against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 116:7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Philip Stünzi, Ursula Brönnimann, and Christine Wittwer for technical assistance. The study was partially supported by the Swiss Federal Office of Science and Education (BBW C01.0122 in the frame of COST 854), Bayer HealthCare AG and the Department of Clinical Research (Vetsuisse Faculty in Bern).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Gottstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haerdi, C., Haessig, M., Sager, H. et al. Humoral immune reaction of newborn calves congenitally infected with Neospora caninum and experimentally treated with toltrazuril. Parasitol Res 99, 534–540 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0199-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0199-7

Keywords

Navigation