Abstract
The immunochromatographic test (ICT) for the rapid diagnosis of malaria has been marketed for several years. In a study in which three Centres of Tropical Medicine participated and data were pooled, performance of the test varied considerably when comparing the results between each centre. The sensitivity of ICT in 2,343 patients tested in our services was 100% and the specificity 99.74%. Moreover, two patients with a positive ICT would initially have been missed by expert microscopy, with Plasmodium falciparum malaria being confirmed microscopically some hours later. The principal reasons for the better performance of the test in our series appear to be blood collection in EDTA vials and considerable experience with handling and interpreting the ICT test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grobusch MP, Hanscheid T, Göbels K, Slevogt H, Zoller T, Rogler G, Teichmann D (2003) Comparison of three antigen detection kits for diagnosis and follow up of falciparum malaria in travellers returning to Berlin, Germany. Parasitol Res 89:354–357
Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Harms G (2001) Evaluation of a dipstick test for the rapid diagnosis of imported malaria among patients presenting within the network Trop Net Europ. Scand J Infect Dis 33:752–754
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Ebenezer Adusu, Barbara Hoppenheit and Dagmar Fengler-Dopp who performed microscopy and ICTs. The study was not supported by the manufacturer of the ICT test.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richter, J., Harms, G., Müller-Stöver, I. et al. Performance of an immunochromatographic test for the rapid diagnosis of malaria. Parasitol Res 92, 518–519 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-004-1069-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-004-1069-9