Abstract
In the present study we calculated the muscle fascicle length (MFL) and the physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) in the elbow flexor muscles of five Homo sapiens and five Pan troglodytes. We also assessed the expression of the myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoforms with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the same muscles and, finally, we analyzed the muscle insertion sites in the proximal epiphyses of the ulna and the radius with 3D geometric morphometrics. Our main objective is to identify quantitative differences in the elbow flexor muscles of Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes in terms of muscle architecture, expression of MyHC isoforms, and bone insertion sites and to explore the association of these differences with the types of locomotion developed by these two species of hominoid primates. We observed that the elbow flexor muscles had a greater PCSA and a higher expression of the fast MyHC-II isoforms in Pan troglodytes, while they had a greater MFL and a higher expression of the slow MyHC-I isoform in Homo sapiens. The insertion site of the brachialis was larger in Pan troglodytes, while that of the biceps brachii was larger in Homo sapiens. Our findings may be related to the greater capacity of force generation in the elbow flexor muscles of Pan troglodytes, as an adaptation to vertical climbing, and to the greater contraction speed and resistance to fatigue of the muscles in Homo sapiens, as an adaptation to the manipulative function of the upper extremities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An KN, Hui FC, Morrey BF, Linscheid RL, Chao EY (1981) Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. J Biomech 14:659–669
Ashton EH, Flinn RM, Oxnard CE, Spence TF (1976) The adaptive and classificatory significance of certain quantitative features of the forelimb in primates. J Zool 17:515–550
Basmajian JV, de Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C (1996) Force-velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. J Physiol 495:573–586
Bottinelli R, Reggiani C (2000) Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 73:195–262
Carlson KJ (2006) Muscle architecture of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): perspectives for investigating chimpanzee behavior. Primates 47:218–229
Cignoni P Callieri M Corsini M Dellepiane M Ganovelli F Ranzuglia G (2008) Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, pp 129–136
Diogo R, Potau JM, Pastor JF et al (2013) Photographic and descriptive musculoskeletal atlas of chimpanzees. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Doran DM (1992) Comparison of instantaneous and locomotor bout sampling methods: a case study of adult male chimpanzee locomotor behavior and substrate use. Am J Phys Anthropol 89:85–99
Gebo DL (2014) Primate comparative anatomy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Harridge SD, Bottinelli R, Canepari M et al (1998) Sprint training, in vitro and in vivo muscle function, and myosin heavy chain expression. J Appl Physiol 84:442–449
Hunt KD (1991) Mechanical implications of chimpanzee positional behavior. Am J Phys Anthropol 86:521–536
Hunt KD (1992) Positional behavior of Pan troglodytes in the Mahale mountains and Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:83–105
Isler K (2005) 3D-kinematics of vertical climbing in hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:66–81
Kikuchi Y (2010) Comparative analysis of muscle architecture in primate arm and forearm. Anat Histol Embryol 39:93–106
Kikuchi Y, Takemoto H, Kuraoka A (2012) Relationship between humeral geometry and shoulder muscle power among suspensory, knuckle-walking, and digitigrade/palmigrade quadrupedal primates. J Anat 220:29–41
Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11:353–357
Langdon JH (2005) The human strategy: an evolutionary perspective on human anatomy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Larsson L, Moss RL (1993) Maximum velocity of shortening in relation to myosin isoform composition in single fibres from human skeletal muscles. J Physiol 472:595–614
Lieber RL, Fridén J (2000) Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 23:1647–1666
Malagelada F Dalmau-Pastor M Vega J Golanó P (2014) Elbow anatomy. In: Sports injuries, Springer, Berlin
Michilsens F, Vereecke EE, D'Aout K, Aerts P (2009) Functional anatomy of the gibbon forelimb: adaptations to a brachiating lifestyle. J Anat 215:335–354
Myatt JP, Crompton RH, Payne-Davis RC et al (2012) Functional adaptations in the forelimb muscles of non-human great apes. J Anat 220:13–28
Nordin M, Frankel VH (2001) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
O’Higgins P (2000) The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat 197:103–120
Oishi M, Ogihara N, Endo H, Asari M (2008) Muscle architecture of the upper limb in the orangutan. Primates 49:204–209
Oishi M, Ogihara N, Endo H, Ichihara N, Asari M (2009) Dimensions of forelimb muscles in orangutans and chimpanzees. J Anat 215:373–382
O’Neill MC, Umberger BR, Holowka NB, Larson SG, Reiser PJ (2017) Chimpanzee super strength and human skeletal muscle evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:7343–7348
Palastanga N, Field D, Soames R (2006) Anatomy and human movement: structure and function. Elsevier, London
Pette D, Staron RS (2000) Myosin isoform, muscle fiber type, and transitions. Microsc Res Tech 50:500–509
Potau JM, Artells R, Bello G et al (2011) Expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in the supraspinatus muscle of different primate species: implications for the study of the adaptation of primate shoulder muscles to different locomotor modes. Int J Primatol 32:931–944
Potau JM, Casado A, de Diego M et al (2018) Structural and molecular study of the supraspinatus muscle of modern humans (Homo sapiens) and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Phys Anthropol 166:934–940
Rose MD (1993) Functional anatomy of the elbow and forearm in primates. In: Gebo DL (ed) Postcranial adaptation in nonhuman primates. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, pp 70–95
Rowe N (1996) The pictorial guide to the living primates. Pogonias Press, Charlestown
Schiaffino S, Reggiani C (2011) Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 91:1447–1531
Sciote JJ, Morris TJ (2000) Skeletal muscle function and fibre types: the relationship between occlusal function and the phenotype of jaw-closing muscles in human. J Orthod 27:15–30
Short KR, Vittone JL, Bigelow ML et al (2005) Changes in myosin heavy chain mRNA and protein expression in human skeletal muscle with age and endurance exercise training. J Appl Physiol 99:95–102
Stroyan M, Wilk KE (1993) The functional anatomy of the elbow complex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 17:279–288
Thorpe SKS, Crompton RH, Günther MM, Ker RF, Alexander RM (1999) Dimensions and moment arms of the hind- and forelimb muscles of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Phys Anthropol 110:179–199
Tirrell TF, Cook MS, Carr JA, Lin E, Ward SR, Lieber RL (2012) Human skeletal muscle biochemical diversity. J Exp Biol 215:2551–2559
Tomsick SD, Petersen BD (2010) Normal anatomy and anatomical variants of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14:379–393
Tuttle RH, Basmajian JV (1974) Electromyography of brachial muscles in Pan gorilla and hominoid evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 41:71–90
Tuttle RH, Velte MJ, Basmajian JV (1983) Electromyography of brachial muscles in Pan troglodytes and Pongo pygmaeus. Am J Phys Anthropol 61:75–83
Wiley DF Amenta N Alcantara DA et al. (2006) Evolutionary Morphing, Landmark Editor 3.0. IDAV. University of California, Davis. https://www.idav.ucdavis.edu/research/EvoMorph. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Academic Press, New York
Ziegler AC (1964) Brachiating adaptations of chimpanzee upper limb musculature. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:15–31
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Manuel Martín, Sebastián Mateo, and Pau Rigol (Body Donation Service, University of Barcelona) for their support and collaboration. We would also like to thank Renee Grupp for assistance in drafting the manuscript. This study was funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain (project CGL2014-52611-C2-2-P to JMP) and by the European Union (FEDER) and by the Ajudes Predoctorals of the University of Barcelona (APIF-UB 2016/2017 to AC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MD, JMP, AC and JFP participated in the dissection of the human and the chimpanzee samples. MD, AC, MG and JM performed the 3D GM analysis. MD and JMP performed the architectural analysis. MD and MG performed the molecular analysis. All the authors participated in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing and review of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
The research complied with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Barcelona and adhered to the legal requirements of Spain.
Data accessibility statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Diego, M., Casado, A., Gómez, M. et al. Structural and molecular analysis of elbow flexor muscles in modern humans and common chimpanzees. Zoomorphology 139, 277–290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-020-00482-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-020-00482-5