Spines of the slate pencil sea urchin Heterocentrotus mamillatus Linnaeus, 1758, are in focus of biomimetic research as they feature a “graceful” failure behaviour under uniaxial compression dissipating energy and resisting high loads even after high strain. This study elucidates and quantifies the organization of calcitic trabeculae and pores in large primary spines of the slate pencil urchin H. mamillatus by image analysis from scanning electron microscopy, X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) and gravimetry. This study delivers a detailed distribution of porosities within the whole spine and shows that parts of the spines have a much higher porosity then hitherto thought. The central part (medulla) of the high-magnesium calcitic stereom of H. mamillatus spines has a porosity range of 75% to nearly 90%. From this innermost structure, more than 200 radially aligned, but often sinuous trabeculae extend to the spine rim. The structure of this complicated meshwork (radiating layer) is best seen in basal cross sections and was confirmed by µCT scans. The radiating layer has a porosity range from 40–70% and is irregularly separated by the dense growth layers (15–35% porosity). Growth layers were classified in proximal and distal growth layers with numbers ranging within a single animal between 3–14 and 2–7, respectively. These growth layers are characteristic for H. mamillatus spines and play a major role in their remarkable mechanical properties. The porosity of the spine increases from base to tip. Biological and mechanical implications of the variations are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Burkhardt A, Hansmann W, Märkel K, Nieman HJ (1983) Mechanical design in spines of diadematoid echinoids (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Zoomorphology 102:189–203
Clarke FW, Wheeler WC (1915) The inorganic constituents of echinoderms. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 90:191–196
Coble R, Kingery W (1956) Effect of porosity on physical properties of sintered alumina. J Am Ceram Soc 39:377–385
Coppard SE, Campbell AC (2004) Taxonomic significance of spine morphology in the echinoid genera diadema and echinothrix. Invertebr Biol 123:357–371
Danzer R (2014) On the relationship between ceramic strength and the requirements for mechanical design. J Eur Ceram Soc 34:3435–3460
Danzer R, Supancic J, Pascual T, Lube T (2007) Fracture statistics of ceramics—Weibull statistics and deviations from Weibull statistics. Eng Fract Mech 74:2912–2932
Dawson MA, Gibson LJ (2007) Optimization of cylindrical shells with compliant cores. Int J Solids Struct 44:1145–1160
DeFoe OK, Compton AH (1925) The density of rock salt and calcite. Phys Rev 25:618–620. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.25.618
Deutler F (1926) Das Wachstum des Seeigelskeletts. In: Hartmann M, Hesse R (eds) Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 119–200
Dotan A (1990) Population structure of the echinoid Heterocentrotus mammillatus (L.) along the littoral zone of the south-eastern Sinai. Coral Reefs 9:75–80
Dotan A, Fishelson L (1985) Morphology of spines of Heterocentrotus mammillatus (Echinodermata: Echinoidae) and its ecological significance. In: Keegan BF, O‘Connor BDS (eds) Echinodermata: Proceedings of the international echinoderm conference, Galway 24–29 Sept 1984. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 253–260
Durham JW (1955) Classification of clypeasteroid echinoids. Univ Calif Press Geol Sci 31:73–198
Ebert TA (1986) A new theory to explain the origin of growth lines in sea urchin spines. Mar Ecol 34:197–199
Ebert TA (1988) Growth, regeneration, and damage repair of spines of the slate-pencil sea urchin Heterocentrotus mammillatus. Pac Sci 42:160–172
Emson RH (1985) Bone idle—a recipe for success? In: Keegan BF, O’Connor BDS (eds) Echinodermata. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 25–30
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lon 382:43–59
Grossmann JN, Nebelsick J (2013a) Stereom Differentiation in spines of Plococidaris verticillata, Heterocentrotus mammillatus and other regular sea urchins. In: Johnson C (ed) Echinoderms in a changing world. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 97–104
Grossmann JN, Nebelsick JH (2013b) Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines. Zoomorphology 132:301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5
Hasenpusch W (2000) Die Stachel der Griffelseeigel. Mikrokosmos 89:23–27
Hesse E (1900) Die Mikrostruktur der fossilen Echinoidenstacheln und deren systematische Bedeutung. In: Bauer M, Koken E, Liebisch T (eds) Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, E. Schweizertbart’sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart, pp 185–264
Ji S, Gu Q, Xia B (2006) Porosity dependence of mechanical properties of solid materials. J Mater Sci 41:1757–1768
Klang K, Bauer G, Toader N, Lauer C, Termin K, Schmier S, Kovaleva D, Haase W, Berthold C, Nickel KG, Speck T, Sobek W (2016) Plants and animals as source of inspiration for energy dissipation in load bearing systems and facades. In: Knippers J, Nickel KG, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction. Springer, Switzerland, pp 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_7
Kroh A, Nebelsick JH (2010) Echinoderms and Oligo-Miocene Carbonate Systems: potential applications in sedimentology and environmental reconstruction. Int Assoc Sedimentol Spec Publ 42:201–228
Kroh A, Smith AB (2010) The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. J Syst Palaeontol 8:147–212
Lawrence JM (1987) A functional biology of echinoderms. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Lu G, Lu GQ, Xiao ZM (1999) Mechanical properties of porous materials. J Porous Mater 6:359–368
Mooi R (1986) Structure and function of clypeasteroid miliary spines (Echinodermata, Echinoides). Zoomorphology 106:212–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00312042
Moureaux C, Perez-Huerta A, Compere P, Zhu W, Leloup T, Cusack M, Dubois P (2010) Structure, composition and mechanical relations to function in sea urchin spine. J Struct Biol 170:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.01.003
Nebelsick JH, Dynowski JF, Grossmann JN, Tötzke C (2015) Echinoderms: hierarchically organized light weight skeletons. In: Hamm C (ed) Evolution of light weight structures. Analyses and technical applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 141–154
Nichols D (1962) Echinoderms. Anchor Press, Essex, p 200
Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from grey-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 9:62–66
Pabst W, Gregorová E, Tichá G (2006) Elasticity of porous ceramics—a critical study of modulus-porosity relations. J Eur Ceram Soc 26:1085–1097
Presser V, Schultheiß S, Berthold C, Nickel KG (2009a) Sea urchin spines as a model-system for permeable, light-weight ceramics with graceful failure behavior. Part I. Mechanical behavior of sea urchin spines under compression. J Bionic Eng 6:203–213
Presser V, Kohler C, Zivcová Z, Berthold C, Nickel KG, Schultheiß S, Gregorová E, Pabst W (2009b) Sea urchin spines as a model-system for permeable, light-weight ceramics with graceful failure behavior. Part II. Mechanical behavior of sea urchin spine inspired porous aluminum oxide ceramics under compression. J Bionic Eng 6:357–364
Presser V, Gerlach K, Vohrer A, Nickel KG, Dreher W (2010) Determination of the elastic modulus of highly porous samples by nanoindentation: a case study on sea urchin spines. J Mater Sci 45:2408–2418
Presser V, Schultheiß S, Kohler C, Berthold C, Nickel KG, Vohrer A, Finckh H, Stegmaier T (2011) Lessons from nature for the construction of ceramic cellular materials for superior energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater 13:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201100066
R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Ridler TW, Calvard S (1978) Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8:630–632
Schmier S, Lauer C, Schäfer I, Klang K, Bauer G, Thielen M, Termin K, Berthold C, Schmauder S, Speck T, Nickel KG (2016) Developing the experimental basis for an evaluation of scaling properties of brittle and ‘Quasi-Brittle’ biological materials. In: Knippers J, Nickel KG, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction. Springer, Switzerland, pp 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_14
Simkiss K, Wilbur KM (1989) Echinoderms - cells and syncytia. Biomineralization: cell biology and mineral deposition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, pp 146–149
Smith A (1980) Stereom microstructures of the echinoid test. Spec Pap Palaeontol 25:1–81
Su X, Kamat S, Heuer AH (2000) The structure of sea urchin spines, large biogenic single crystals of calcite. J Mater Sci 35:5545–5551
Telford M (1982) Echinoderm spine structure, feeding and host relationships of four species of dissodactylus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Bull Mar Sci 32:584–594
Toader N, Sobek W, Nickel KG (2017) Energy absorption in functionally graded concrete bioinspired by sea urchin spines. J Bionic Eng 14:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1672-6529(16)60405-5
Tsafnat N, Fitz Gerald JD, Le HN, Stachurski ZH (2012) Micromechanics of sea urchin spines. PLoS One 7(9):e44140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044140
Vevers HG (1966) Pigmentation. In: Boolootian RA (ed) Physiology of Echinodermata. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp 265–267
Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2012) smatr 3- an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol Evol 3:257–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00153.x
Weber JN (1969a) The incorporation of magnesium into the skeletal calcites of echinoderms. Am J Sci 267:537–566
Weber JN (1969b) Origin of concentric banding in the spines of the tropical Echinoid Heterocentrotus. Pac Sci 23:452–466
Weber J, Greer R, Voight B, White E, Roy R (1969) Unusual strength properties of echinoderm calcite related to structure. J Ultrastruct Res 26:355–366
The authors gratefully thank the German Research Foundation (DFG—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) for funding this work within the framework of the Collaborative Research Centre (SFB/Transregio) 141 “Biological Design and Integrative Structures” project B01. We also thank Barbara Maier and Simone Schafflick in the workshop for their support. The work of an anonymous reviewer is kindly appreciated.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statements on the welfare of animals
The sea urchins were purchased dead from a fossils collector, were not killed for the purpose of this study and are not listed as endangered species.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Lauer, C., Grun, T.B., Zutterkirch, I. et al. Morphology and porosity of the spines of the sea urchin Heterocentrotus mamillatus and their implications on the mechanical performance. Zoomorphology 137, 139–154 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-017-0385-4
- Sea urchin spines
- µCT scans