Advertisement

Zoomorphology

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 295–306 | Cite as

Early embryonic development of the freshwater shrimp Caridina multidentata (Crustacea, Decapoda, Atyidae)

  • Marleen Klann
  • Gerhard ScholtzEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Decapod crustaceans show a great diversity of developmental modes at all levels. In particular, early cleavage varies from total via mixed to superficial modes and from determinate cleavage with a stereotyped pattern to indeterminate cleavage. However, the ground pattern of early decapod development is not clear. To address this problem, we studied the early embryonic development of the caridean shrimp Caridina multidentata with a combination of confocal laser scanning microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, 4D microscopy and 3-D reconstruction software. Despite a yolk-rich egg, the cleavage is holoblastic and shows a distinct pattern of blastomere arrangement, characterized by two interlocking cell bands. This resembles the conditions in dendrobranchiate shrimps, which most likely are the sister group to Pleocyemata to which C. multidentata belongs. Hence, our results offer the possibility to assume total cleavage with blastomeres arranged in two interlocking cell bands as ancestral cleavage mode for Decapoda.

Keywords

Cleavage Gastrulation Egg-nauplius Malacostraca Evolution Cell lineage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Carsten Wolff and Peer Martin for their help with technical and methodological issues. Furthermore, thanks must go to Prof. Maurice Elphick for his comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Finally, we owe thanks to Megazoo Berlin-Waltersdorf for providing us with an aquarium starter kit together with essential specimens of Cardina multidentata. The study was supported by Cluster of Excellence ‘Image Knowledge Gestaltung’, base project ‘Genesis and Genealogy of Form’ at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1 (WMV 2013 kb)

Supplementary Material 2 (WMV 13060 kb)

Supplementary Material 3 (WMV 13303 kb)

References

  1. Alwes F, Scholtz G (2004) Cleavage and gastrulation of the euphausiacean Meganyctiphanes norvegica (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Zoomorphology 123:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwes F, Scholtz G (2006) Stages and other aspects of the embryology of the parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Reptantia, Astacida). Dev Genes Evol 216:169–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DT (1973) Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Biffis C, Alwes F, Scholtz G (2009) Cleavage and gastrulation of the dendrobranchiate shrimp Penaeus monodon (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Decapoda). Arthropod Struct Dev 38:527–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bracken HD, de Grave S, Felder DL (2009) Phylogeny of the infraorder Caridea based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes. In: Martin JW, Crandall KA, Felder DL (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics (crustacean issues 18). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 281–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks WK (1882) Leucifer: a study in morphology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 173:57–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks WK, Herrick FH (1891) The embryology and metamorphosis of the Macroura. Mem Natl Acad Sci 5:325–576Google Scholar
  8. Burkenroad MD (1963) The evolution of the Eucarida, (Crustacea, Eumalacostraca), in the relation to the fossil record. Tulane Stud Geol 2:1–17Google Scholar
  9. De Grave SD, Pentcheff ND, Ahyong ST, Chan TY, Crandall KA, Dworschak PC, Felder DL, Feldmann RM, Fransen CHJM, Goulding LYD, Lemaitre R, Low MEY, Martin JW, Ng PKL, Schweitzer CE, Tan SH, Tshudy D, Wetzer R (2009) A classification of living and fossil genera of decapod crustaceans. Raffles B Zool Suppl. 21:1–109Google Scholar
  10. Dixon DJ, Ahyong S, Schram FR (2003) A new hypothesis of decapod phylogeny. Crustaceana 76:935–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fioroni P (1970) Am Dotteraufschluß beteiligte Organe und Zelltypen bei höheren Krebsen: der Versuch einer einheitlichen Terminologie. Zool Jb Anat 87:481–522Google Scholar
  12. Fioroni P (1980) Das Dorsalorgan der Arthropoden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der malakostraken Krebse—eine vergleichend embryologische Übersicht. Zool Jb Anat 104:425–465Google Scholar
  13. Fioroni P (1987) Allgemeine und vergleichende Embryologie der Tiere. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fransen CHJM, de Grave S (2009) Evolution and radiation of shrimp-like decapods: an overview. In: Martin JW, Crandall KA, Felder DL (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics (crustacean issues 18). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorham FP (1895) The cleavage of the egg of Virbius zostericola, Smith. J Morphol 11:742–746Google Scholar
  16. Herrick FH (1895) The American lobster: a study of its habits and development. Bull US Fish Commun 15:1–252, pl. 54Google Scholar
  17. Hertzler PL (2005) Cleavage and gastrulation in the shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei (Malacostraca, Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata). Arthropod Struct Dev 34:455–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertzler PL, Clark WH (1992) Cleavage and gastrulation in the shrimp Sicyonia ingentis: invagination is accompanied by oriented cell division. Development 116:127–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishikawa C (1885) On the development of a freshwater macrourus crustacean, Atyephira compressa, De Haan. Q J Microsc Sci 25:391–428Google Scholar
  20. Ishikawa C (1902) Über das rhythmische Auftreten der Furchungslinie bei Atyephyra compressa De Haan. Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 15:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jirikowski GJ, Richter S, Wolff C (2013) Myogenesis of Malacostraca—the “egg-nauplius” concept revisited. Front Zool 10:76PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korschelt E (1944) 5. Band, 1. Abteilung, 7. Buch: Decapoda, 6. Lieferung Ontogenie. In: Schellenberg A (ed), Dr. H.G. Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, 2. Auflage. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Becker und Erler, Leipzig, pp 671–861Google Scholar
  23. Korschelt E, Heider K (1936) Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang R (1973) Die Ontogenese von Maja squinado (Crustacea malacostraca, Decapoda, Brachyura) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der embryonalen Ernährung und der Entwicklung des Darmtraktes. Zool Jb Anat 90:389–449Google Scholar
  25. Montuy-Gómez D, Gómez-Guitiérrez J, Rodríguez-Jaramillo C, Robinson CJ (2012) Nyctiphanes simplex (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) temporal association of embryogenesis and early larval development with female molt and ovarian cycles. J Plankton Res 34:531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller YMR (1984) Die Embryonalentwicklung von Macrobrachium carcinus (L.) (Malacostraca, Decapoda, Natantia). Zool Jb Anat 112:51–78Google Scholar
  27. Nair KB (1948) The embryology of Caridina laevis Heller. Proc Indian Acad Sci (B) 29:211–288Google Scholar
  28. Ooishi S (1959) Studies on the teloblasts in the decapod embryo. I. Origin of teloblasts in Heptacarpus rectirostris Stimpson. Embryologia 4:283–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ooishi S (1988) Crustacea. In: Dan K, Sekiguchi K, Ando H, Watanabe H (eds) Embryology of Invertebrates, vol 2. Baifukan, Tokyo, pp 131–248 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Pawlak J, Sellars MJ, Wood A, Hertzler PL (2010) Cleavage and gastrulation in the Kuruma shrimp Penaeus (Marsupenaeus) japonicus (Bate): a revised cell lineage and identification of a presumptive germ cell marker. Dev Growth Differ 52:677–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter ML, Perez-Losada M, Crandall KA (2005) Model-based multi-locus estimation of decapod phylogeny and divergence times. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:355–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qiu GF, Chen Y, Cui Z, Zhu XL (2013) Localization of germline marker vasa homolog RNA to a single blastomere at early cleavage stages in the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense: evidence for germ cell specification by preformation. Gene 513:53–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richter S, Scholtz G (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of the Malacostraca (Crustacea). J Zool Syst Evol Res 39:113–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheidegger G (1976) Stadien der Embryonalentwicklung von Eupagurus prideauxi Leach (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Darmentwicklung und der am Dotterabbau beteiligten Zelltypen. Zool Jb Anat 95:297–353Google Scholar
  35. Scholtz G (1997) Cleavage, germ band formation and head segmentation: the ground pattern of the Euarthropoda. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH (eds) Arthropod relationships. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 317–332Google Scholar
  36. Scholtz G (2000) Evolution of the nauplius stage in malacostracan crustacean. J Zool Syst Evol Res 38:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scholtz G, Richter S (1995) Phylogenetic systematics of the reptantian Decapoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Zool J Linn Soc 113:289–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scholtz G, Wolff C (2013) Arthropod embryology: cleavage and germ band development. In: Minelli A, Boxshall G, Fusco G (eds) Arthropod biology and evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scholtz G, Abzhanov A, Alwes F, Biffis C, Pint J (2009) Development, genes, and decapod evolution. In: Martin JW, Crandall KA, Felder DL (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics (crustacean issues 18). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shen H, Braband A, Scholtz G (2013) Mitogenomic analysis of decapod crustacean phylogeny corroborates traditional views on their relationships. Mol Phylogenet Evol 66:776–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shiino SM (1950) Studies on the embryonic development of Palinurus japonicus (von Siebold). J Fac Fish Pref Univ Mie-Tsu 1:146–168 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  42. Sollaud E (1923) Recherches sur l’embryogénie des crustacés décapodes de la sous-famille des Palaemoninae. Bull Biol Fr Belg Suppl 5:1–234Google Scholar
  43. Stevens BG (2006) Embryonic development and morphometry in the blue king crab Paralithodes platypus studied by using image and cluster analysis. J Shellfish Res 25:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taube E (1909) Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Euphausiden. I. Die Furchung des Eies bis zur Gastrulation. Z Wiss Zool 92:427–464Google Scholar
  45. Toon A, Finley M, Staples J, Crandall KA (2009) Decapod phylogenetics and molecular evolution. In: Martin JW, Crandall KA, Felder DL (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics (crustacean issues 18). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 348–359Google Scholar
  46. Tsang LM, Ma KY, Ahyong ST, Chan T-Y, Chu KH (2008) Phylogeny of Decapoda using two nuclear protein-coding genes: origin and evolution of the Reptantia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48:359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weldon WFR (1892) Formation of the germ-layers in Crangon vulgaris. Q J Microsc Sci 33:343–363Google Scholar
  48. Weygoldt P (1961) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Ontogenie der Decapoda: Embryologische Untersuchungen an Palaemonetes varians (Leach). Zool Jb Anat 79:223–270Google Scholar
  49. Zehnder H (1934) Über die Embryonalentwicklung des Flusskrebses. Acta Zool 15:262–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zilch R (1978) Embryologische Untersuchungen an der holoblastischen Ontogenese von Penaeus trisulcatus Leach (Crustacea, Decapoda). Zoomorphologie 90:67–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Biologie/Vergleichende ZoologieHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.School of Biological and Chemical SciencesQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations