Zoomorphology

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 379–387 | Cite as

Metamorphosis in Craniiformea revisited: Novocrania anomala shows delayed development of the ventral valve

  • Andreas Altenburger
  • Andreas Wanninger
  • Lars E. Holmer
Original Paper

Abstract

We revisited the brachiopod fold hypothesis and investigated metamorphosis in the craniiform brachiopod Novocrania anomala. Larval development is lecithotrophic and the dorsal (brachial) valve is secreted by dorsal epithelia. We found that the juvenile ventral valve, which consists only of a thin layer that was previously described as periostracal, is not a valve and is not secreted by the same epithelia as the dorsal valve. It is secreted by the attachment area of the larva at the posterior-most tip of the posterior larval lobe. The same attachment area is used by larvae of rhynchonelliform brachiopods during metamorphosis to cement their pedicle to the substrate. N. anomala is therefore not initially attached by a valve but by material corresponding to pedicle cuticle. This is different to previous descriptions, which had led to speculations about a folding event in the evolution of Brachiopoda. We show that the “brachiopod fold hypothesis,” which argues that brachiopods are transversely “folded” across the ontogenetic anterior–posterior axis, should be rejected at least with respect to the craniiforms. The data now suggest that the Craniiformea may be a derived group within the Rhynchonelliformea. This interpretation suggests that the last common ancestor of the Craniiformea has lost the pedicle and the ventral valve in early juvenile development. Characters that have previously been considered to be shared between the Craniiformea and the Linguliformea (clade Inarticulata), such as a through-gut and missing hinge articulation, may thus be secondarily derived characters of the Craniiformea within the Rhynchonelliformea.

Keywords

Ontogeny Development Craniiformea Phylogeny Morphology Body plan Evolution 

References

  1. Altenburger A, Wanninger A (2009) Comparative larval myogenesis and adult myoanatomy of the rhynchonelliform (articulate) brachiopods Argyrotheca cordata, A. cistellula, and Terebratalia transversa. Front Zool 6:3. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altenburger A, Wanninger A (2010) Neuromuscular development in Novocrania anomala: evidence for the presence of serotonin and a spiralian-like apical organ in lecithotrophic brachiopod larvae. Evol Dev 12:16–24. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00387.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey-Brock JH, Emig CC (2000) Hawaiian Phoronida (Lophophorata) and their distribution in the Pacific region. Pac Sci 54:119–126Google Scholar
  4. Bassett MG (2000) Craniida. In: Kaesler RL (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H. Brachiopoda, revised, vol 2. The Geological Society of America Inc. and The University of Kansas. Boulder, CO, and Lawrence, KS, pp 169–183Google Scholar
  5. Carlson SJ (1995) Phylogenetic relationships among extant brachiopods. Cladistics 11:131–197. doi:10.1016/0748-3007(95)90010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuang SH (1960) An anatomical, histological, and histochemical study of the gut of the brachiopod, Crania anomala. Q J Microsc Sci 101:9–18Google Scholar
  7. Chuang SH (1996) Competence, pre- and post-settlement choices of articulate brachiopod larvae. In: Copper P, Jin J (eds) Brachiopods: proceedings of the third International Brachiopod Congress. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 65–67Google Scholar
  8. Cohen BL (2000) Monophyly of brachiopods and phoronids: reconciliation of molecular evidence with Linnaean classification (the subphylum Phoroniformea nov.). Proc R Soc B 267:225–231. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.0991 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen BL (2013) Rerooting the rDNA gene tree reveals phoronids to be ‘brachiopods without shells’; dangers of wide taxon samples in metazoan phylogenetics (Phoronida; Brachiopoda). Zool J Linn Soc 167:82–92. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00869.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen BL, Bitner MA (2013) Molecular phylogeny of rhynchonellide articulate brachiopods (Brachiopoda, Rhynchonellida). J Paleontol 87:211–216. doi:10.5061/Dryad.79411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen BL, Weydmann A (2005) Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the early Cambrian. Org Divers Evol 5:253–273. doi:10.1016/j.ode.2004.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen BL, Gawthrop A, Cavalier-Smith T (1998) Molecular phylogeny of brachiopods and phoronids based on nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Philos Trans R Soc B 353:2039–2061. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen BL, Holmer LE, Lüter C (2003) The brachiopod fold: a neglected body plan hypothesis. Palaeontology 46:59–65. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conway Morris S (1998) The crucible of creation: the Burgess Shale and the rise of animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Conway Morris S, Peel JS (1995) Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their role in early protostome evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 347:305–358. doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duméril C (1806) Zoologie analytique, ou Méthode naturelle de classification des animaux. Allais, Paris. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.11646
  17. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sorensen MV, Haddock SH, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745–749. doi:10.1038/nature06614 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman G (2000) Regional specification during embryogenesis in the craniiform brachiopod Crania anomala. Dev Biol 227:219–238. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9857 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman G (2003) Regional specification during embryogenesis in Rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Dev Biol 261:268–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grey JE (1848) On the arrangement of the Brachiopoda. Ann Mag Nat Hist 2:435–440Google Scholar
  21. Gutmann WF, Vogel K, Zorn H (1978) Brachiopods - biomechanical interdependences governing their origin and phylogeny. Science 199:890–893. doi:10.1126/science.199.4331.890 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B (2008) Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept. Proc R Soc B 275:1927–1933. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0372 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmer LE, Popov LE, Bassett MG, Laurie J (1995) Phylogenetic analysis and ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Palaeontology 38:713–741Google Scholar
  24. Holmer LE, Skovsted CB, Brock GA, Valentine JL, Paterson JR (2008) The Early Cambrian tommotiid Micrina, a sessile bivalved stem group brachiopod. Biol Lett 4:724–728. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0277 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmer LE, Skovsted CB, Larsson C, Brock GA, Zhang Z (2011) First record of a bivalved larval shell in Early Cambrian tommotiids and its phylogenetic significance. Palaeontology 235–239. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01030.x
  26. Huxley TH (1853) On the morphology of the cephalous mollusca, as illustrated by the anatomy of certain Heteropoda and Pteropoda collected during the voyage of H.M.S. “Rattlesnake” in 1846–50. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 143:29–65. doi:10.1098/rstl.1853.0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee DE, Brunton CHC (1986) Neocrania n. gen., and a revision of Cretaceous-Recent brachiopod genera in the family Craniidae. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Geol 40:141–160Google Scholar
  28. Lee DE, Brunton CHC (2001) Novocrania, a new name for the genus Neocrania Lee & Brunton, 1986 (Brachiopoda, Craniida), preoccupied by Neocrania Davis, 1978 (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Bull nat Hist Mus Lond (Geol) 57:5Google Scholar
  29. Lüter C (2001) Brachiopod larval setae—a key to the phylum’s ancestral life cycle? In: Brunton CHC, Cocks LRM, Long SL (eds) Brachiopods past and present. Systematics association special volumes, vol 63. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 46–55Google Scholar
  30. Lüter C (2007) Anatomy. In: Selden PA (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H. Brachiopoda, revised, vol 6. The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas. Boulder, CO, and Lawrence, KS, pp 2321–2355Google Scholar
  31. Malakhov VV, Kuzmina TV (2006) Metameric origin of lateral mesenteries in Brachiopoda. Dokl Biol Sci 409:340–342. doi:10.1134/s0012496606040223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morse ES (1870) The Brachiopoda, a division of Annelida. Am J Sci 50:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murdock DJE, Donoghue PCJ, Bengtson S, Marone F (2012) Ontogeny and microstructure of the enigmatic Cambrian tommotiid Sunnaginia Missarzhevsky, 1969. Palaeontology 55:661–676. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01131.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nielsen C (1991) The development of the brachiopod Crania (Neocrania) anomala (O. F. Müller) and its phylogenetic significance. Acta Zool 72:7–28. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.1991.tb00312.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen C (2005) Trochophora larvae: cell-lineages, ciliary bands and body regions. 2. Other groups and general discussion. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 304:401–447. doi:10.1002/jez.b.21050 Google Scholar
  36. Popov LE, Bassett MG, Holmer LE, Laurie J (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of higher taxa of Brachiopoda. Lethaia 26:1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1993.tb01502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Popov LE, Egerquist E, Holmer LE (2007) Earliest ontogeny of Middle Ordovician rhynchonelliform brachiopods (Clitambonitoidea and Polytoechioidea): implications for brachiopod phylogeny. Lethaia 40:85–96. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2006.00008.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Popov LE, Bassett MG, Holmer LE, Skovsted CB, Zuykov MA (2010) Earliest ontogeny of Early Palaeozoic Craniiformea: implications for brachiopod phylogeny. Lethaia 43:323–333. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00197.x Google Scholar
  39. Popov LE, Bassett MG, Holmer LE (2012) Earliest ontogeny of Early Palaeozoic Craniiformea: compelling evidence for lecithotrophy. Lethaia 45:566–573. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2012.00315.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rowell AJ (1960) Some early stages in the development of the brachiopod Crania anomala (Müller). Ann Mag Nat Hist 13:35–56Google Scholar
  41. Skovsted CB, Balthasar U, Brock GA, Paterson JR (2009a) The tommotiid Camenella reticulosa from the early Cambrian of South Australia: morphology, scleritome reconstruction, and phylogeny. Acta Palaeontol Pol 54:525–540. doi:10.4202/app.2008.0082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skovsted CB, Holmer LE, Larsson CM, Högström AES, Brock GA, Topper TP, Balthasar U, Stolk SP, Paterson JR (2009b) The scleritome of Paterimitra: an Early Cambrian stem group brachiopod from South Australia. Proc R Soc B 276:1651–1656. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1655 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ (2011) Molecular paleobiological insights into the origin of the Brachiopoda. Evol Dev 13:290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00480.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stricker SA, Reed CG (1985a) Development of the pedicle in the articulate brachiopod Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Terebratulida). Zoomorphology 105:253–264. doi:10.1007/BF00311968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stricker SA, Reed CG (1985b) The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata). 1. Development of the mantle. J Morphol 183:233–250. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051830302 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stricker SA, Reed CG (1985c) The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata). 2. Formation of the protegulum and juvenile shell. J Morphol 183:251–271. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051830303 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Temereva EN, Malakhov VV (2011) The evidence of metamery in adult brachiopods and phoronids. Invert Zool 8:87–101Google Scholar
  48. Vinther J, Nielsen C (2005) The Early Cambrian Halkieria is a mollusc. Zool Scr 34:81–89. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2005.00177.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wägele J-W (2005) Foundations of phylogenetic systematics. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams A (1997) Shell structure. In: Kaesler RL (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H. Brachiopoda (revised), vol 1. The Geological Society of America and Paleontological Institute. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS, pp 267–320Google Scholar
  51. Williams A, Carlson SJ (2007) Affinities of brachiopods and trends in their evolution. In: Selden PA (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H. Brachiopoda, revised, vol 6. Geological Society of America and Paleontological Institute. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KSGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams A, Holmer LE (2002) Shell structure and inferred growth, functions and affinities of the sclerites of the problematic Micrina. Palaeontology 45:845–873. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williams A, Wright AD (1970) Shell structure of the Craniacea and other calcareous inarticulate Brachiopoda. The Palaeontological Association. Special Papers in Palaeontology, no. 7. London, pp 51Google Scholar
  54. Williams A, Carlson SJ, Brunton CHC, Holmer LE, Popov L (1996) A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Proc R Soc B 351:1171–1193. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0101 Google Scholar
  55. Williams A, Carlson SJ, Brunton CHC (2007) Outline of suprafamilial classification and authorship. In: Selden PA (ed) Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology. Part H. Brachiopoda (revised), vol 6. The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS, pp XXXIX–XLVGoogle Scholar
  56. Zezina O (2008) Biogeography of the recent brachiopods. Paleontol J 42:830–858. doi:10.1134/s0031030108080078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Altenburger
    • 1
  • Andreas Wanninger
    • 2
  • Lars E. Holmer
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Integrative ZoologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of Earth Sciences, PalaeobiologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations