Abstract
Purpose
Recent studies have revealed that primary tumor resection (PTR) surgery could improve prognosis in some solid tumors. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether patients with stage IVB cervical carcinoma can benefit from PTR surgery and who can benefit.
Methods
We extracted and obtained data on patients with stage IVB cervical carcinoma from the SEER database from 2010 to 2017 and classified them into two groups: the surgery and the non-surgery group. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the two groups were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). The independent prognostic variables were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Then, the model was established to select the optimal patients to receive PTR surgery using multivariate logistic regression.
Results
After PSM, the study included 476 cervical carcinoma (stage IVB) patients, of whom 238 underwent PTR surgery. Compared to the non-surgery group, the surgery group’s median OS and median CSS were both longer (median OS: 27 months vs. 13 months, P < 0.001; median CSS: 52 months vs. 21 months, P < 0.001). The model showed no organ metastasis, adenocarcinoma, G1/2, and chemotherapy were more supportive of performing PTR surgery. The calibration curves and DCA showed that the model had high predictive accuracy and excellent clinical applicability. Finally, the “surgery benefit” group had the OS that was approximately four times better than “surgery non-benefit” group.
Conclusion
PTR surgery can potentially improve the prognosis of patients with cervical carcinoma at stage IVB. The model could probably select optimal candidates and provide a new perspective on individualized treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data were extracted from a public free database, SEER (https://seer.cancer.gov/).
References
Gyawali B, Iddawela M (2017) Bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer: issues and challenges for low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Oncol 3(2):93–97. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.004895
Keam SJ (2022) Cadonilimab: first approval. Drugs 82(12):1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01761-9
Kim JY, Kim JY, Kim JH, Yoon MS, Kim J, Kim YS (2012) Curative chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer presenting with paraortic and left supraclavicular lymph node metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(3):741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.070
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Clark R, Cohn D, Crispens MA, Damast S, Dorigo O, Eifel PJ, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, Han E, Huh WK, Lurain JR, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Fader AN, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Tillmanns T, Ueda S, Wyse E, Yashar CM, McMillian NR, Scavone JL (2019) Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(1):64–84. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001
Kuo SW, Chen PH, Lu TP, Chen KC, Liao HC, Tsou KC, Tsai TM, Lin MW, Hsu HH, Chen JS (2022) Primary tumor resection for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a retrospective case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 29(8):4873–4884. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11483-7
Kwon ED, Foster BA, Hurwitz AA, Madias C, Allison JP, Greenberg NM, Burg MB (1999) Elimination of residual metastatic prostate cancer after surgery and adjunctive cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blockade immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(26):15074–15079. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.15074
Lea JS, Sheets EE, Wenham RM, Duska LR, Coleman RL, Miller DS, Schorge JO (2002) Stage IIB-IVB cervical adenocarcinoma: prognostic factors and survival. Gynecol Oncol 84(1):115–119. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6473
Li H, Wu X, Cheng X (2016) Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 27(4):e43. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e43
Li H, Pang Y, Cheng X (2020) Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study. J Gynecol Oncol 31(1):e8. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e8
Liu J, Blake SJ, Yong MC, Harjunpaa H, Ngiow SF, Takeda K, Young A, O’Donnell JS, Allen S, Smyth MJ, Teng MW (2016) Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. Cancer Discov 6(12):1382–1399. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0577
Liu J, Liu P, Gong F, Tian Y, Zhao X (2022) Case report: a PD-L1-positive patient with pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma achieving an impressive response to immunotherapy. Front Immunol 13:815598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.815598
Oishi S, Kudaka W, Toita T, Ariga T, Nakamoto T, Wakayama A, Nagai Y, Kaneshima I, Nishihira K, Aoki Y (2016) Prognostic factors and treatment outcome for patients with stage IVB cervical cancer. Anticancer Res 36(7):3471–3475
Polcz M, Schlegel C, Edwards GC, Wang F, Tan M, Kiernan C, Solorzano CC, Idrees K, Parikh A, Bailey CE (2020) Primary tumor resection offers survival benefit in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 27(8):2795–2803. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08602-7
Romero D (2022) Benefit with cemiplimab in cervical cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(4):220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00613-5
Ruggiero RA, Bruzzo J, Chiarella P, Bustuoabad OD, Meiss RP, Pasqualini CD (2012) Concomitant tumor resistance: the role of tyrosine isomers in the mechanisms of metastases control. Cancer Res 72(5):1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2964
Ruiterkamp J, Ernst MF, van de Poll-Franse LV, Bosscha K, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Voogd AC (2009) Surgical resection of the primary tumour is associated with improved survival in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(11):1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2009.03.012
Salvo G, Odetto D, Pareja R, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT (2020) Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: a review of gaps and questions that remain. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(6):873–878. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001257
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HR, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM, Oaknin A, Reid TJ, Leitao MM, Michael HE, Monk BJ (2014) Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 370(8):734–743. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1309748
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM, Oaknin A, Reid TJ, Leitao MM, Michael HE, DiSaia PJ, Copeland LJ, Creasman WT, Stehman FB, Brady MF, Burger RA, Thigpen JT, Birrer MJ, Waggoner SE, Moore DH, Look KY, Koh WJ, Monk BJ (2017) Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet 390(10103):1654–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31607-0
Tohme S, Simmons RL, Tsung A (2017) Surgery for cancer: a trigger for metastases. Cancer Res 77(7):1548–1552. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1536
Vu M, Yu J, Awolude OA, Chuang L (2018) Cervical cancer worldwide. Curr Probl Cancer 42(5):457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.06.003
Zhang Y, Hu J, Yang J, Xie Y, Chen Z, Shangguan W, Han J, He W, Yang J, Zheng Z, Zhong Q, Zhu D, Xie W (2022) Selection of optimal candidates for cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a predictive model based on SEER database. Front Oncol 12:814512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.814512
Acknowledgements
Thanks for the establishment and sharing of SEER database. We also thank to the patients who provided data to the SEER database.
Funding
The study was supported by Major Clinical Research Projects of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University (2021LCYJ004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XHW, YQY and YNH designed the study. YSZ, YNH and SJH performed the experiments. YSZ and YNH analyzed the data. YNH, SJH, YSZ, ZXZ and BLZ wrote the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the study has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
He, Y., Zhang, Y., Hu, S. et al. Primary tumor resection improves survival benefit of stage IVB cervical carcinoma: a new perspective. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 11013–11023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04988-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04988-5