Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-world surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stages IA–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicentric observational study involving 11,958 patients

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical resection is cornerstone treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and offers a chance for cure. This study was conducted to determine current surgical treatment patterns and outcomes of Chinese patients with NSCLC.

Methods

Data of patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC of stages IA–IIIA and who underwent surgery between July 2014 and July 2020 were retrospectively collected from 9 tertiary hospitals in China. Cox model was used for multivariate analyses.

Results

This study included 11,958 patients, among whom 59.1%, 19.2%, and 21.7% were in stages I, II, and IIIA, respectively. Lobectomy was the most common operation method (78.4%), followed by wedge resection (8.2%), segmentectomy (5.4%), pneumonectomy (5.2%), and bronchial sleeve lobectomy (2.8%). Among patients who underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy, majority had stage I NSCLC (87.2% and 93.3%, respectively), and sublobectomy accounted for 20.7% of stage I operations. With a median follow-up time of 30.2 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of entire population were 88.9% and 96.1% at 1 year, 75.2% and 85.1% at 3 years, and 65.3% and 77.0% at 5 years, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease were 93.2%, 82.7%, 70.3%, 67.0%, and 52.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

This is the largest real-world cohort study of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery in China, where we described characteristics of surgical treatment and survival outcomes. The results of our study provide insights into real-world surgical treatment status for surgeons and clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the study participants and investigators for their participation. Technical support for this work was provided by LinkDoc Inc., and the authors thank Liu Jie, Chen Zijia, and Tang Lang for their support in data curation, statistical analysis, and data interpretation.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. SD, HJ: Writing and experimental design; Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. CP: Statistical guidance. LX: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. HeJianxing: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. XL: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. FX: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. LY: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. LD: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. ZX: Data collection, curation, and putting forward modification opinions. LL: Experimental design conceptualization and finalizing the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lunxu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Daqiang Sun, Jian Hu, Xiaofei Li, Jianxing He, Lin Xu, Xiangning Fu, Yang Liu, Deruo Liu, Pingyan Chen, Xun Zhang, and Lunxu Liu declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Tianjin Chest Hospital (institutional review board number, 2021-LW-001) and was conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki and its latest amendments.

Consent to participate

There was no active enrollment or active follow-up of study subjects, and no data were collected directly from individuals. The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature.

Consent to publish

All authors have consented to publication of the results presented in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 70 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, D., Hu, J., Li, X. et al. Real-world surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stages IA–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicentric observational study involving 11,958 patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 8213–8223 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04729-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04729-8

Keywords

Navigation