Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of repeat transurethral resection on restaging, preventing tumor recurrence and progression in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients who received initial en bloc resection.
Methods and patients
We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of 330 consecutive patients who received en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eligible patients with and without repeat transurethral resection were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Important covariates were balanced between the two groups. We compared the recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, recurrence rate, and progression rate between groups. And the perioperative results regarding residual tumors and the safety of the repeat resection were also evaluated.
Results
Finally, there are 245 patients included in our analysis with a median follow-up duration of 19 months (range 3–50). Detrusor muscle presented in 244 (99.6%) specimens at initial en bloc resection. And among them, 30 (12.2%) patients had undergone a repeat resection and 215 (87.8%) did not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 30 pairs were further analyzed.No case of upstaging was identified in repeat resection. During the follow-up, recurrence was observed in 5 (16.7%) and 7 (23.3%) patients in reresection group and non-reresection group, respectively. And progression was found only in 1 (3.3%) patient in each group. The 1-year recurrence-free survival estimates were comparable (86.7% vs 83.3%, p = 0.86) between groups.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that repeat resection after initial transurethral en bloc resection for bladder tumor appears not to improve staging accuracy, recurrence, and progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Avallone MA, Sack BS, El-Arabi A et al. (2017) Ten-year review of perioperative complications after transurethral resection of bladder tumors: analysis of monopolar and Plasmakinetic bipolar cases. J Endourol 31(8):767–773. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0056
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O et al. (2022) European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol 81(1):75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010
Contieri R, Lughezzani G, Buffi NM et al. (2022) Could we safely avoid a second resection in selected patients with T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Preliminary results of cost-effectiveness study from HUmanitas New Indications for ReTUR (HuNIRe) multicenter prospective trial. Front Oncol 12(879):399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.879399
Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U et al. (2010) Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 58(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.007
Gendy R, Delprado W, Brenner P et al. (2016) Repeat transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a contemporary series. BJU Int 117(Suppl 4):54–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13265
Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F et al. (2016) The impact of re-transurethral resection on clinical outcomes in a large multicentre cohort of patients with t1 high-grade/grade 3 bladder cancer treated with bacille calmette-guérin. BJU Int 118(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13354
Guo CC, Al-Ahmadie HA, Flaig TW et al. (2021) Contribution of bladder cancer pathology assessment in planning clinical trials. Urol Oncol 39(10):713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.01.001
Hu H, Li B, Liu Z et al. (2021) The individual surgical protocol of transurethral En bloc resection of bladder tumor based on VI-RADS and preliminary experience. Chin J Urol 42(3):180–184. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200407-00268
Hu H, Zhou M, Yang B et al. (2022) A systematic review on the role of repeat transurethral resection after initial En bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175049
Kim LHC, Patel MI (2020) Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Transl Androl Urol 9(6):3056–3072. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.38
Kramer MW, Altieri V, Hurle R et al. (2017) Current evidence of transurethral En-bloc resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus 3(6):567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.004
Lee LJ, Kwon CS, Forsythe A et al. (2020) Humanistic and economic burden of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results of two systematic literature reviews. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 12:693–709. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S274951
Li Z, Zhou Z, Cui Y et al. (2022) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of perioperative outcomes and prognosis of transurethral En-bloc resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Surg 104(106):777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106777
Long G, Zhang Y, Sun G et al. (2021) Safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of bladder tumors versus transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 36(9):1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03272-7
Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM (2010) Detrusor muscle in the first, apparently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. Eur Urol 57(5):843–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.047
Monteiro LL, Witjes JA, Agarwal PK et al. (2019) ICUD-SIU international consultation on bladder cancer 2017: management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 37(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2438-9
Mori K, Miura N, Babjuk M et al. (2020) Low compliance to guidelines in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: a systematic review. Urol Oncol 38(10):774–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.013
Powles T, Bellmunt J, Comperat E et al. (2022) Bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 33(3):244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012
Rubio-Briones J, Algaba F, Gallardo E et al. (2021) Recent advances in the management of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using a multidisciplinary approach: Practical recommendations from the spanish oncology genitourinary (sogug) working group. Cancers 13(19):4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194762
Sfakianos JP, Kim PH, Hakimi AA et al. (2014) The effect of restaging transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Urol 191(2):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.022
Xu J, Xu Z, Yin H et al. (2022) Can a re-resection be avoided after initial En bloc resection for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Front Surg 9(849):929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.849929
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Motlagh RS et al. (2022) En bloc resection for bladder tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on safety, recurrence and histopathology. J Urol 207(4):754–768. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002444
Yanagisawa T, Sato S, Hayashida Y et al. (2022) Do we need repeat transurethral resection after En bloc resection for pathological T1 bladder cancer? BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15760
Acknowledgements
Mengqi Zhou would like to dedicate this work to the memory of his dearest uncle Lixing Zhou (1967-2022), who lost his brave fight against cancer.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other supports were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: HH and MZ; methodology: MZ, SZ, BY, and PY; software: MZ; validation: BY, SZ, and FL; formal analysis: MZ; investigation: MZ, BY, SZ, ZL, and HH; data curation: MZ, SZ, BY, and PY; writing—original draft preparation: MZ; writing—review and editing: BY, FL, ZL, and HH; supervision: HH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval, consent to participate, and consent to publish
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB20200729).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, M., Yang, B., Zhou, S. et al. Will repeat resection after initial transurethral en bloc resection benefit patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? A propensity score matching analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 5861–5869 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04564-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04564-3