Abstract
Purpose
Surgical prehabilitation aims to reduce a decline in the functional capacity thereby optimising health and fitness before surgery. One of the major barriers in successfully implementing a prehabilitation program in hospitals has been poor patient adherence. In our pilot survey on surgical patients, we sought to explore patient preferences regarding the program design, the barriers and enablers to patient participation in a multimodal prehabilitation program.
Methods
The survey was administered to patients undergoing major abdominal surgery in the preoperative period. The first two parts of the instrument mainly included questions on demographics, social history, activity levels, interest towards prehabilitation program and their involvement in co-design, preferences towards the components of the program, the barriers and enablers. The last part of survey included symptom and physical assessments.
Results
The survey was completed by 24 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The median age of our cohort was 71 (range 35–91) years and 75% were retired. 75% of our participants were extremely interested in improving health and fitness and 63% were very keen to co-design their program when explained. Home-based programs were preferred by most participants and among exercises, walking was preferred by 71% of the participants. One third of the participants were interested in professional dietary counselling. There were only two participants who preferred group psychological therapy while 25% preferred individual psychological counselling sessions.
Conclusion
Our survey highlighted a need to design a personalised program with tailored interventions due to the wide variation in the interest and preferences among surgical patients.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abrantes AM, Battle CL, Strong DR, Ing E, Dubreuil ME, Gordon A, Brown RA (2011) Exercise preferences of patients in substance abuse treatment. Ment Health Phys Act 4(2):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2011.08.002
Arch JJ, Vanderkruik R, Kirk A, Carr AL (2018) A closer lens: cancer survivors’ supportive intervention preferences and interventions received. Psychooncology 27(5):1434–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4526
Awasthi R, Minnella EM, Ferreira V, Ramanakumar AV, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Carli F (2019) Supervised exercise training with multimodal pre-habilitation leads to earlier functional recovery following colorectal cancer resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63(4):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13292
Belinchon I, Rivera R, Blanch C, Comellas M, Lizan L (2016) Adherence, satisfaction and preferences for treatment in patients with psoriasis in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence 10:2357–2367. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S117006
Carli F, Silver JK, Feldman LS, McKee A, Gilman S, Gillis C, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Gamsa A, Stout N, Hirsch B (2017) Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 28(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2016.09.002
Conroy DE, Elavsky S, Hyde AL, Doerksen SE (2011) The dynamic nature of physical activity intentions: a within-person perspective on intention-behavior coupling. J Sport Exerc Psychol 33(6):807–827. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.6.807
Cust AE, Smith BJ, Chau J, van der Ploeg HP, Friedenreich CM, Armstrong BK, Bauman A (2008) Validity and repeatability of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire: a validation study using accelerometers as an objective measure. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-33
Endevelt R, Gesser-Edelsburg A (2014) A qualitative study of adherence to nutritional treatment: perspectives of patients and dietitians. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:147–154. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S54799
Eng L, Pringle D, Su J, Shen X, Mahler M, Niu C, Charow R, Tiessen K, Lam C, Halytskyy O, Naik H, Hon H, Irwin M, Pat V, Gonos C, Chan C, Villeneuve J, Harland L, Shani RM, Brown MC, Selby P, Howell D, Xu W, Liu G, Alibhai SMH, Jones JM (2018) Patterns, perceptions, and perceived barriers to physical activity in adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 26(11):3755–3763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4239-5
Ewing JA (1984) Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 252(14):1905–1907. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.252.14.1905
Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M (1999) Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition 15(6):458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00084-2
Ferreira V, Agnihotram RV, Bergdahl A, van Rooijen SJ, Awasthi R, Carli F, Scheede-Bergdahl C (2018) Maximizing patient adherence to prehabilitation: what do the patients say? Support Care Cancer 26(8):2717–2723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4109-1
Frikkel J, Gotte M, Beckmann M, Kasper S, Hense J, Teufel M, Schuler M, Tewes M (2020) Fatigue, barriers to physical activity and predictors for motivation to exercise in advanced Cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care 19(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00542-z
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85
Gurunathan U, King JL, French C, Iswariah H, Hancock PR, Holmes P, Linnane M, Mahoney AJ, Chandrasegaram MD, Tronstad O (2022) A multimodal surgical prehabilitation programme for major abdominal cancer surgery at a tertiary metropolitan institution in Australia: our initial experience. Anaesth Intensive Care 50(3):258–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X211027891
Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G (2005) Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med 142(9): 776–785. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15867410
Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E (2010) Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther 15(3):220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004
Martin D, Besson C, Pache B, Michel A, Geinoz S, Gremeaux-Bader V, Larcinese A, Benaim C, Kayser B, Demartines N, Hubner M (2021) Feasibility of a prehabilitation program before major abdominal surgery: a pilot prospective study. J Int Med Res 49(11):3000605211060196. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211060196
Rosenstock IM (1974) Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 2(4):328–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403
Schuit AS, Holtmaat K, van Zwieten V, Aukema EJ, Gransier L, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2021) Organizing psycho-oncological care for cancer patients: the patient’s perspective. Front Psychol 12:625117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625117
Sladdin I, Chaboyer W, Ball L (2018) Patients’ perceptions and experiences of patient-centred care in dietetic consultations. J Hum Nutr Diet 31(2):188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12507
Watanabe SM, Nekolaichuk CL, Beaumont C (2012) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: development and refinement. Psychooncology 21(9):977–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1996
Waterland JL, Ismail H, Amin B, Granger CL, Denehy L, Riedel B (2021) Patient acceptance of prehabilitation for major surgery: an exploratory survey. Support Care Cancer 29(2):779–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05547-1
Webb AR, Robertson N, Sparrow M (2013) Smokers know little of their increased surgical risks and may quit on surgical advice. ANZ J Surg 83(10):753–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12096
Wright EJ (2017) Exercising patient-centredness in prehabilitation programs. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):509–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.013
Acknowledgements
We thank the preadmission clinic nurses at The Prince Charles Hospital for helping us by administering the survey. We would like to acknowledge the contributions from Dr. Harish Iswariah and Mr. Peter Hancock for their initial involvement in the discussions.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by UG and CS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by UG and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of The Prince Charles Hospital (HREC/18/QPCH/114; dated 19/4/2018).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the above submission.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurunathan, U., Tronstad, O. & Stonell, C. Patient characteristics and preferences for a surgical prehabilitation program design: results from a pilot survey. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 1361–1367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04420-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04420-4