Abstract
Purpose
The performance of urinary markers for detecting bladder cancer (BC) is influenced by various factors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of smoking habits on the performance of four commonly used urine markers.
Methods
Urine samples of 723 patients with suspected BC were analysed using urine cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+ test), and quantitative nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) immunoassay. The smoking habits of all patients were recorded and a cystoscopy performed within 2 weeks after urinary marker testing. Rates of false negative and false positive results were compared between non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers by contingency analyses.
Results
We included 723 patients in this study, 431 (59.6%) of which were non-smokers, 215 former smokers (29.7%), and 77 (10.7%) current smokers. 148 patients (20.5%) had a tumour at the time of urinary marker testing. Respective rates of false positive test results among non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers were: 16.3, 19.1, and 11.5% (p = 0.81) for urine cytology; 36.8, 42.0, and 32.7% for the uCyt+ test (p = 0.88); 18.0, 19.1, and 13.5% for FISH (p = 0.66); and 69.5, 71.6, and 71.2% for NMP22 (p = 0.67). Respective rates of false negatives among non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers were: 31.4, 15.1, and 28.0% for cytology (p = 0.34); 21.4, 22.6, and 16.0% for uCyt+ test (p = 0.67); 24.3, 13.2, and 28.0% for FISH (p = 0.88); and 10.0, 18.9, and 8.0% for NMP22 (p = 0.80).
Conclusions
Our results strongly suggest that smoking habits do not affect performance characteristics of urinary markers in the diagnostics of BC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atsu N, Ekici S, Oge OO, Ergen A, Hascelik G, Ozen H (2002) False-positive results of the NMP22 test due to hematuria. J Urol 167(2 Pt 1):555–558
Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J, Roupret M (2011) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.017
Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Zigeuner R (2017) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 71(3):447–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041
Bakhru A, Erlinger TP (2005) Smoking cessation and cardiovascular disease risk factors: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS Med 2(6):e160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020160
Bubendorf L (2011) Multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (UroVysion) for the detection of urothelial carcinoma—FISHing for the right catch. Acta Cytol 55(2):113–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000323652
Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, Lotan Y (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 63(2):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
Comploj E, Mian C, Ambrosini-Spaltro A, Dechet C, Palermo S, Trenti E, Pycha A (2013) uCyt+/ImmunoCyt and cytology in the detection of urothelial carcinoma: an update on 7422 analyses. Cancer Cytopathol 121(7):392–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21287
Blessing A, Ikechi E, Ayobami F (2016) Cytology analysis of urine among cigarette smokers. Am J Biomed Sci 8(1):56–67
de Maat MP, Pietersma A, Kofflard M, Sluiter W, Kluft C (1996) Association of plasma fibrinogen levels with coronary artery disease, smoking and inflammatory markers. Atherosclerosis 121(2):185–191
Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242
Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC (2011) Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 306(7):737–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1142
Greene KL, Berry A, Konety BR (2006) Diagnostic utility of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt + test in bladder cancer. Rev Urol 8(4):190–197
Grossman HB (2005) Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay. JAMA 16(293(7):810–816
Horstmann M, Todenhofer T, Hennenlotter J, Aufderklamm S, Mischinger J, Kuehs U, Schwentner C (2013) Influence of age on false positive rates of urine-based tumor markers. World J Urol 31(4):935–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0906-1
Imirzalioglu P, Uckan S, Alaaddinoglu EE, Haberal A, Uckan D (2005) Cigarette smoking and apoptosis. J Periodontol 76(5):737–739. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.737
Kehinde EO, Al-Mulla F, Kapila K, Anim JT (2011) Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology, urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in the detection of bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 45(2):113–121. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2010.533694
Kipp BR, Tanasescu M, Else TA, Bryant SC, Karnes RJ, Sebo TJ, Halling KC (2009) Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization and its ability to predict bladder cancer recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Mol Diagn 11(2):148–154. https://doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080096
Kipp BR, Tyner HL, Campion MB, Voss JS, Karnes RJ, Sebo TJ, Zhang J (2008) Chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in urothelial carcinoma and rarer histologic variants of bladder cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 130(4):552–559. https://doi.org/10.1309/DFJUHY3WPC9GUU2W
Layfield LJ, Elsheikh TM, Fili A, Nayar R, Shidham V (2004) Review of the state of the art and recommendations of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for urinary cytology procedures and reporting: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force. Diagn Cytopathol 30(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10401
Lotan Y, O’Sullivan P, Raman JD, Shariat SF, Kavalieris L, Frampton C, Darling D (2017) Clinical comparison of noninvasive urine tests for ruling out recurrent urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.03.008
Lotan Y, Shariat SF, the NMP22 Study Group (2008) Impact of risk factors on the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 point-of-care test for bladder cancer detection. BJU Int 101(11):1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07473.x
Mao L, Lee JS, Kurie JM, Fan YH, Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Hong WK (1997) Clonal genetic alterations in the lungs of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(12):857–862
Mian C, Pycha A, Wiener H, Haitel A, Lodde M, Marberger M (1999) Immunocyt1: a new tool for detecting transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract. J Urol 161(5):1486–1489
Oge O, Kozaci D, Gemalmaz H (2002) The BTA stat test is nonspecific for hematuria: an experimental hematuria model. J Urol 167(3):1318–1319
Papanicolaou GN, Marshall VF (1945) Urine sediment smears as a diagnostic procedure in cancers of the urinary tract. Science 101(2629):519–520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.101.2629.519
Pereira CS, Juchniuk de Vozzi MS, Dos Santos SA, Vasconcelos MA, de Paz CC, Squire JA, Martelli L (2014) Smoking-induced chromosomal segregation anomalies identified by FISH analysis of sperm. Mol Cytogenet 7(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-014-0058-7
Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, Caspers HP, Jakse G, Boecking A (2005) The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(3):304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2004.12.008
Riesz P, Lotz G, Paska C, Szendroi A, Majoros A, Nemeth Z, Kiss A (2007) Detection of bladder cancer from the urine using fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. Pathol Oncol Res 13(3):187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893498
Robbins WA, Vine MF, Truong KY, Everson RB (1997) Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess effects of smoking, caffeine, and alcohol on aneuploidy load in sperm of healthy men. Environ Mol Mutagen 30(2):175–183
Rubes J, Lowe X, Moore D 2nd, Perreault S, Slott V, Evenson D, Wyrobek AJ (1998) Smoking cigarettes is associated with increased sperm disomy in teenage men. Fertil Steril 70(4):715–723
Sajid KM, Parveen R, Durr-e S, Chaouachi K, Naeem A, Mahmood R, Shamim R (2007) Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in hookah smokers, cigarette smokers and non-smokers. J Pak Med Assoc 57(12):595–599
Schroeder GL, Lorenzo-Gomez MF, Hautmann SH, Friedrich MG, Ekici S, Huland H, Lokeshwar V (2004) A side by side comparison of cytology and biomarkers for bladder cancer detection. J Urol 172(3):1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000134347.14643.ab
Shariat SF, Marberger MJ, Lotan Y, Sanchez-Carbayo M, Zippe C, Ludecke G, Karakiewicz PI (2006) Variability in the performance of nuclear matrix protein 22 for the detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 176(3):919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.017
Sharma S, Zippe CD, Pandrangi L, Nelson D, Agarwal A (1999) Exclusion criteria enhance the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 and BTA stat. J Urol 162(1):53–57
Sokolova IA, Halling KC, Jenkins RB, Burkhardt HM, Meyer RG, Seelig SA, King W (2000) The development of a multitarget, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. J Mol Diagn 2(3):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60625-3
Souto GR, Caliari MV, Lins CE, de Aguiar MC, de Abreu MH, Mesquita RA (2010) Tobacco use increase the number of aneuploid nuclei in the clinically healthy oral epithelium. J Oral Pathol Med 39(8):605–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00907.x
Spira A, Beane J, Shah V, Liu G, Schembri F, Yang X, Brody JS (2004) Effects of cigarette smoke on the human airway epithelial cell transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(27):10143–10148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401422101
Talhout R, Schulz T, Florek E, van Benthem J, Wester P, Opperhuizen A (2011) Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(2):613–628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8020613
Tetu B, Tiguert R, Harel F, Fradet Y (2005) ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ improves the sensitivity of urine cytology in patients followed for urothelial carcinoma. Mod Pathol 18(1):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800262
Todenhofer T, Hennenlotter J, Kuhs U, Tews V, Gakis G, Aufderklamm S, Schwentner C (2012) Influence of urinary tract instrumentation and inflammation on the performance of urine markers for the detection of bladder cancer. Urology 79(3):620–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.067
Todenhofer T, Hennenlotter J, Tews V, Gakis G, Aufderklamm S, Kuehs U, Schwentner C (2013) Impact of different grades of microscopic hematuria on the performance of urine-based markers for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 31(7):1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.011
Vergara-Lluri ME, Hu E, Rao JY, Levin M, Apple SK, Moatamed NA (2014) Comparative evaluation of ProEx C and ImmunoCyt/uCyt assays in atypical urine cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 138(9):1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0433-OA
Wang-Sattler R, Yu Y, Mittelstrass K, Lattka E, Altmaier E, Gieger C, Illig T (2008) Metabolic profiling reveals distinct variations linked to nicotine consumption in humans—first results from the KORA study. PLoS One 3(12):e3863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003863
Wistuba II, Lam S, Behrens C, Virmani AK, Fong KM, LeRiche J, Samet JM, Srivastava S, Minna JD, Gazdar AF (1997) Molecular damage in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(18):1366–1373
Yafi FA, Brimo F, Steinberg J, Aprikian AG, Tanguay S, Kassouf W (2015) Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 33(2):66 e25–66 e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.008
Zeng C (2000). NuMA: a nuclear protein involved in mitotic centrosome function. Microsc Res Tech 49(5):467–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(20000601)49:5<467::AID-JEMT9>3.0.CO;2-V
Zeng Z, Zhou XJ (2010) Detection of bladder cancer by FISH test: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 39(2):75–78
Zhang ZF, Shu XM, Cordon-Cardo C, Orlow I, Lu ML, Millon TV, Scher H (1997) Cigarette smoking and chromosome 9 alterations in bladder cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 6(5):321–326
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In the study a retrospective chart review but no specific study-related investigations were performed in the cohort. Therefore, in accordance with the ethics committee no informed consent was obtained in the framework of the study.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deininger, S., Hennenlotter, J., Rausch, S. et al. No influence of smoking status on the performance of urine markers for the detection of bladder cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 1367–1373 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2639-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2639-z