Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

The extent and duration of routine follow-up after paraaortic (PA) radiotherapy for stage I seminoma remain controversial in terms of efficacy, costs of technical investigations and long-term morbidity.

Objective

To analyze the current literature assessing routine follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma.

Evidence acquisition

We identified all published reports on PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma (1986–2005). We analyzed time patterns of recurrence, sites and methods of detection of relapse, and follow-up programs used.

Evidence synthesis

We identified 11 publications reporting outcome in 2,280 patients. Median time to recurrence in 80 relapsing patients was 15.5 months. Less than 10% of recurrences were diagnosed beyond the third year of follow-up. Isolated locoregional or distant recurrence was observed in 52 and 20 patients, respectively, without significant difference in median time to relapse. 19 out of 43 recurrences with reported method of detection of relapse were diagnosed by routine technical investigations. There was no significant difference in time to relapse between those patients followed with low volume as compared to high-volume imaging protocols.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that technical investigations in posttreatment surveillance should be restricted to the first 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, surveillance programs with a high volume of imaging apparently do not lead to earlier detection or less advanced stage at the time of relapse as compared to protocols with low volume imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F et al (2005) Guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol 48:885–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg M, Schmidberger H, Meisner C et al (1999) Radiotherapy for stage I, IIA/B testicular seminoma. Int J Cancer 83:823–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns F, Bremer M, Meyer A et al (2005) Adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I seminoma: is there a role for further reduction of treatment volume? Acta Oncol 44:142–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunt AM, Scoble JE (1992) Para-aortic irradiation for early stage testicular seminoma. Clin Oncol l4:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz TA, Walden TL, Prestidge BR (1998) Cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma. Cancer 82:1126–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claßen J, Souchon R, Hehr T et al (2001) Treatment of early stage testicular seminoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Classen J, Schmidberger H, Meisner C et al (2004) Para-aortic irradiation for stage I testicular seminoma: results of a prospective study in 675 patients. A trial of the German testicular cancer study group (GTCSG). Br J Cancer 90:2305–2311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claßen J, Souchon R, Schmidberger H et al (2005) Is follow-up necessary after adjuvant radiotherapy for testicular seminoma? Results of a prospective trial in 675 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 181(Suppl 1):61 (Abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen J, Schmidberger H, Souchon R, Weissbach L, Hartmann M, Hartmann JT, Hehr T, Bamberg M (2009) What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy? An analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients. Strahlenther Onkol (accepted)

  • Fossa SD, Horwich A, Russel JM et al (1999) Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: a Medical Research Council randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17:1146–1154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey ML, Geldart TR, Duell R et al (2002) Routine computerised tomographic scans of the thorax in surveillance of stage I testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell cancer—a necessary risk? Ann Oncol 13:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM et al (2005) Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I testicular seminoma: a report on Medical Research Council trial TE18, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328). J Clin Oncol 23:1200–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Kawakita M et al (2002) Follow-up of clinical stage > I testicular cancer patients: cost and benefit considerations. Int J Urol 9:154–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiricuta IC, Sauer J, Bohndorf W (1996) Omission of the pelvic irradiation in stage I testicular seminoma: a study of postorchiectomy paraaortic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35:293–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp HG, Kuczyk M, Classen J et al (2006) Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer. Drugs 66:641–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon S et al (2008a) European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 53:478–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon S et al (2008b) European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 53:497–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livsey JE, Taylor B, Mobarek N et al (2001) Patterns of relapse following radiotherapy for stage I seminoma of the testis: implications for follow-up. Clin Oncol 13:296–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logue JP, Harris MA, Livsey JE et al (2003) Short course para-aortic radiation for stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:1304–1309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mead GM, Fosså SD, Oliver RT et al (2008) Relapse patterns in 2,466 stage 1 seminoma patients (pts) entered into Medical Research Council randomised trials. J Clin Oncol 26(Suppl): 5020 (Abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior D, Hammer P, Fimmers R et al (2001) Long term results and morbidity of paraaortic compared with paraaortic and iliac adjuvant radiation in clinical stage I seminoma. Anticancer Res 21:2989–2994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi TM, Souhami L, Sultanem K et al (2005) Long-term results of para-aortic irradiation for patients with stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:741–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niewald M, Waziri A, Walter K et al (1995) Low dose radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: early results. Radiother Oncol 37:164–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RTD, Mason MD, Mead GM et al (2005) Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomized trial. Lancet 366:293–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Read G, Johnston RJ (1993) Short duration radiotherapy in stage I seminoma on the testis: preliminary results of a prospective study. Clin Oncol 5:364–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmayer F, Joos H, Deutschmann H et al (1999) Long-term tumor control and fertility after para-aortic limited radiotherapy of stage I seminoma. Strahlenther Onkol 175:320–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda NN, Kinsella TJ, Ritter MA (1996) Adjuvant radiation versus observation: a cost analysis of alternate management schemes in early-stage testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol 14:2933–2939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souchon R, Schmoll HJ, Krege S (eds) (2002) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of testis cancer on the basis of evidence-based medicine (EBM) [German Testicular Cancer Study Group]. Qualitätssicherung in der Onkologie, 1st edn. München Bern Wien New York, Zuckschwerdt

  • Spermon JR, Witjes JA, Kiemeney LA (2004) Efficacy of routine follow-up after first-line treatment for testicular cancer. World J Urol 22:235–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultanem K, Souhami L, Benk V et al (1998) Para-aortic irradiation only appears to be adequate treatment for patients with stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:455–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MB, Carrington BM, Livsey JE et al (2001) The effect of radiotherapy changes on site of relapse in stage I testicular seminoma. Clin Oncol 56:116–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trigo MJ, Tabernero JM, Paz-Ares L et al (2000) Tumor markers at the time of recurrence in patients with germ cell tumors. Cancer 88:162–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willich N, Wendt T, Rohloff R et al (1986) Zur Strahlentherapie des Seminoms: kleinvolumige Bestrahlung im Stadium pT1N0M0–prophylaktische Mediastinalbestrahlung. Strahlenther Onkol 162:735–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Claßen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claßen, J., Souchon, R., Hehr, T. et al. Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136, 227–232 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0653-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0653-x

Keywords

Navigation