Abstract
Purpose
Gastric cancer is usually diagnosed at later stages (stages III and IV) in China, and the overall 5-year survival rate is low at 40%. Metastases are responsible for the majority of cancer fatalities. The molecular mechanisms governing metastasis are poorly understood.
Methods
We have analyzed gene expression data based on gene interaction networks and molecular pathways rather than separate genes utilizing hierarchical cluster analysis, Gene ontology analysis and pathway analysis.
Results
We have analyzed gene expression data from advanced gastric cancer tissues, corresponding adjacent noncancerous gastric tissues and its peritonium metastasis. Our studies indicated that metastatic tumor was related to changes in apoptosis pathway and proteasome degradation pathway, TRAF2 and IRF3 are up-regulated in apoptosis pathway, NEDD4 and UBE1 are up-regulated in proteasome degradation pathway.
Conclusion
The advent of high-throughput investigation of gene using Microarray technology, a systems approach relying on groups of interacting genes is essential for understanding the processes of cancer. We have identified apoptosis pathway and proteasome degradation pathway associated with metastasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19(2):185–193
Conti A, Ageunnouz M, La Torre D (2005) Expression of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors 1 and 2 and regulation of the nuclear factor-kappaB antiapoptotic activity in human gliomas. J Neurosurg 103(5):873–881
Crawford NP, Hunter KW (2006) New perspectives on hereditary influences in metastatic progression. Trends Genet 22(10):555–561
Curtis RK, Oresic M, Vidal-Puig A (2005) Pathways to the analysis of microarray data. Trends Biotechnol 23:429–435
DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO (1997) Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680–686
Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14863–14868
Esparza EM, Arch RH (2005) Receptor on naive and activated T cells, uses TNF receptor-associated factor 2 in a novel fashion as an inhibitor of NF-κB activation. J Immunol 174:7875–7882
Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, Roberts CJ, Stoughton R, Armour CD, Bennett HA, Coffey E, Dai H, He YD, Kidd MJ, King AM, Meyer MR, Slade D, Lum PY, Stepaniants SB, Shoemaker DD, Gachotte D, Chakraburtty K, Simon J, Bard M, Friend SH (2000) Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102:109–126
Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR (2000) The national cancer data base report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth edition American Joint Committee on cancer staging, proximal disease, and the ‘different disease’ hypothesis. Cancer 88:921–932
Hunter K (2006) Host genetics influence tumour metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 6(2):141–146
Jin J, Li X, Gygi SP, Harper JW (2007) Dual E1 activation systems for ubiquitin differentially regulate E2 enzyme charging. Nature 447(7148):1135–1138
Kabra R, Knight KK, Zhou R, Snyder PM (2008) Nedd4-2 induces endocytosis and degradation of proteolytically cleaved epithelial Na+ channels. J Biol Chem 283(10):6033–6039
Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):27–30
Kong X, Mas V, Archer KJ (2008) A non-parametric meta-analysis approach for combining independent microarray datasets: application using two microarray datasets pertaining to chronic allograft nephropathy. BMC Genomics 9:98
Manoli T, Gretz N, Gröne HJ, Kenzelmann M, Eils R, Brors B (2006) Group testing for pathway analysis improves comparability of different microarray datasets. Bioinformatics 22(20):2500–2506
Murdaca J, Treins C, Monthouël-Kartmann MN, Pontier-Bres R, Kumar S, Van Obberghen E, Giorgetti-Peraldi S (2004) Grb10 prevents Nedd4-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 degradation. J Biol Chem 279(25):26754–26761
Onn A, Fidler IJ (2002) Metastatic potential of human neoplasms. In Vivo 16(6):423–429
Ptitsyn AA, Weil MM, Thamm DH (2008) Systems biology approach to identification of biomarkers for metastatic progression in cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 9(S9):S8
Ramaswamy S, Ross KN, Lander ES, Golub TR (2003) A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat Genet 33(1):49–54
Tomfohr J, Lu J, Kepler TB (2005) Pathway level analysis of gene expression using singular value decomposition. BMC Bioinformatics 6:225
Trauzold A, Röder C, Sipos B, Karsten K, Arlt A, Jiang P, Martin-Subero JI, Siegmund D, Müerköster S, Pagerols-Raluy L, Siebert R, Wajant H, Kalthoff H (2005) CD95 and TRAF2 promote invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells. FASEB J 19(6):620–622
Vitulo N, Vezzi A, Romualdi C, Campanaro S, Valle G (2007) A global gene evolution analysis on Vibrionaceae family using phylogenetic profile. BMC Bioinformatics S1:S23
Wang X, Trotman LC, Koppie T, Alimonti A, Chen Z, Gao Z, Wang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Cordon-Cardo C, Pandolfi PP, Jiang X (2007) NEDD4-1 is a proto-oncogenic ubiquitin ligase for PTEN. Cell 128(1):129–139
Yu GZ, Chen Y, Long YQ, Dong D, Mu XL, Wang JJ (2008) New insight into the key proteins and pathways involved in the metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Oncol Rep 19(5):1191–1204
Zhan WH, Han FH (2008) Surgical therapy of gastric cancer in china. J Pract Oncol 23:91–93
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from Zhejiang Provincial Department of Science and Technology Research Foundation (No. 2008C33040).
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, YY., Ye, ZY., Zhao, ZS. et al. Systems biology approach to identification of biomarkers for metastatic progression in gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136, 135–141 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0644-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0644-y