Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of unknown nonhematological tumors by bone marrow biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 10,112 samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate how unselected bone marrow (BM) biopsy examinations could help in the diagnosis of clinically unknown nonhematological tumors.

Methods

10,112 plastic-embedded BM biopsy sections were retrospectively analyzed. In the analysis we focused on the following aspects: (1) the frequency of BM involvement arising from clinically unknown nonhematological malignancies, (2) the clinical indication for BM biopsy examination in cases with tumor BM metastasis, (3) the primary sites of the metastatic tumors, and (4) the advantage of plastic-embedded biopsy sections over paraffin-embedded samples and the complementarity of biopsy with aspiration smears.

Results

Of the 10,112 BM samples analyzed, 101 (1.0%) were interpreted as being nonhematological tumor metastases. In cases with metastatic tumors, the nonhemocyte-related changes, such as skeletal pain (25%) and bone destruction (5%), were considerably higher than in those without metastasis (3.7 and 0.32%, respectively; < 0.001). Primary lesions were documented antemortem in 50 of the 101 biopsy-positive cases (49.5%); the most frequent being in the lung, gastric tract, and breast. Using this assay, a higher incidence of metastatic tumors was detected when compared with previously reported paraffin-embedded samples. The frequency of metastatic tumors based on aspiration smears when the positive results for biopsy sections were used as a reference was 74.3%. All the 101 sections with metastatic tumors showed various degrees of myelofibrosis.

Conclusions

We concluded that the routine BM biopsy examination is helpful in detecting insidious metastatic nonhematological malignancies. Skeletal pain and bone destruction are critical indications for susceptible patients to undergo BM examination. Plastic embedding of biopsy sections appears to be more sensitive than the paraffin embedding of samples and is an excellent complementation to isolated aspiration smears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bitter MA, Fiorito D, Corkill ME et al (1994) Bone marrow involvement by lobular carcinoma of the breast cannot be identified reliably by routine histological examination alone. Hum Pathol 25:781–788. doi:10.1016/0046-8177(94)90247-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bretton PR, Melamed MR, Fair WR et al (1994) Detection of occult micrometastases in the bone marrow of patients with prostate carcinoma. Prostate 25:108–114. doi:10.1002/pros.2990250208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casey TT, Beckstead JH (1990) Plastic versus paraffin embedding for histopathology and immunocytochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 14:500–501. doi:10.1097/00000478-199005000-00013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis LD, Jensen WN, Westerman MP (1964) Needle biopsy of bone and marrow: an experience with 1445 biopsies. Arch Intern Med 114:213–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fei Y, Jia-cheng X, Xiao-long J et al (2006) Pathologic diagnosis of bone marrow biopsy for metastatic carcinomas. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 26:444–447 Med Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Feliu J, Gonzalez Baron M, Artal A et al (1991) Bone marrow examination in small cell lung cancer–when is it indicated? Acta Oncol 30:587–591. doi:10.3109/02841869109092423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiwada K, Sera Y, Nishimura M (1970) Autopsy case of secondary myelofibrosis due to bone marrow metastasis of stomach cancer. Lryo 24:585–590

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemona A, Dzieciol J, Sulik M et al (1989) Neoplastic metastases in the bone marrow from cancers of the digestive system (stomach, pancreas, liver and gallbladder). Patol Pol 40:205–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krenacs T, Bagdi E, Stelkovics E et al (2005) How we process trephine biopsy specimens: epoxy resin embedded bone marrow biopsies. J Clin Pathol 58:897–903. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.023788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maillefert JF, Tavernier C, Tebib J (2000) Determining the site of the primary cancer in patients with skeletal metastasis of unknown origin. Cancer 88:1759–1761. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1759::AID-CNCR33>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manegold C, Krempien B, Kaufmann M et al (1988) The value of bone marrow examination for tumor staging in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 114:425–428. doi:10.1007/BF02128190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moid F, DePalma L (2005) Comparison of relative value of bone marrow aspirates and bone marrow trephine biopsies in the diagnosis of solid tumor metastasis and Hodgkin lymphoma: institutional experience and literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:497–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F (1998) Pathology of bone marrow, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 38–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Naresh KN, Lampert I, Hasserjian R et al (2006) Optimal processing of bone marrow trephine biopsy: the Hammersmith Protocol. J Clin Pathol 59:903–911. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.020610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papac RJ (1994a) Bone marrow metastases. A review. Cancer 74:2403–2413. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9<2403::AID-CNCR2820740904>3.0.CO;2-F

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale D, Chikkappa G (1986) Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, biopsy imprints, and biopsy sections. Am J Hematol 22:381–389. doi:10.1002/ajh.2830220407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabharwal BD, Malhotra VV, Aruna SS et al (1990) Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections. J Postgrad Med 36:194–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Akihama T, Yamaguchi A et al (1987) Lysozyme secreting tumor: a case of gastric cancer associated with myelofibrosis due to disseminated bone marrow metastasis. Jpn J Med 26:58–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toner GC, Thomas RL, Schwarz MA (1989) Metastatic bone marrow involvement from supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 103:225–226. doi:10.1017/S0022215100108539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trillet-Lenoir VN, Arpin D, Brune J (1994) Bone marrow metastases detection in small cell lung cancer. A review. Anticancer Res 14:2795–2797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandecandelaere M, Flipo RM, Cortet B et al (2004) Bone metastases revealing primary tumors. Comparison of two series separated by 30 years. Joint Bone Spine 71:224–229. doi:10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00123-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincic L, Weston S, Riddell RH (1989) Bone core biopsies. Plastic or paraffin? Am J Surg Pathol 13:329–334. doi:10.1097/00000478-198904000-00009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. H. Joachim Deeg of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for revising the manuscript and for providing helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, L., Luxi, S., Ying, T. et al. Diagnosis of unknown nonhematological tumors by bone marrow biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 10,112 samples. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135, 687–693 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0503-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0503-2

Keywords

Navigation