Skip to main content
Log in

FISH analysis of chromosomes 3 and 6 on fine needle aspiration biopsy samples identifies distinct subgroups of uveal melanomas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Circumstantial evidence suggests that development of uveal melanoma may be associated to two different pathogenetic pathways, either loss of chromosome 3 or extra copies of 6p (+6p). Chromosome 3 monosomy (−3) is detected in approximately half of uveal melanomas, and is strongly linked to metastatic disease, whereas +6p accounts for one-fourth of uveal melanomas with no clear clinical correlations. The aim of our study was to verify if the analysis of chromosomes 3 and 6 was able to distinguish two groups of patients for translating this approach in the clinical practise as prognostic tool.

Methods

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with probes for chromosome 3, 6p and 6q was used to analyze cytological material obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) from 28 primary uveal melanomas, just before brachytherapy.

Results

Abnormalities affecting 6p and 6q were found in 14 tumors (50%), and −3 in 16 cases (57%). Interestingly, −3 and +6p were mutually exclusive in 23 cases (82%), whereas in two cases only (7%) they coexisted. In particular, +6p alone was present in 9 lesions (32%), −3 was the sole aberration in 11 cases (39%), and concomitant −3 and −6q in 3 other cases (11%).

Conclusions

Although the patient cohort is limited, our findings confirm the hypothesis of a bifurcated pathogenetic model of uveal melanoma. Moreover, our results suggest that investigation of both markers on FNAB samples obtained in vivo could provide a clearer clinical picture of genetic lesions when no histological material is available for prognostic evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalto Y, Eriksson L, Seregard S, Larsson O, Knuutila S (2001) Concomitant loss of chromosome 3 and whole arm losses and gains of chromosome 1, 6, or 8 in metastasizing primary uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:313–317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers JP, Harbour JW (2006) Molecular pathobiology of uveal melanoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 46:167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu DN, YU GP, McCormick SA, Schneider S, Finger PT (2005) Population-based incidence of uveal melanoma in various races and ethnic groups. Am J Ophthalmol 140:612.e1–612.e8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes S, Damato BE, Giddings I, Hiscott PS, Humphreys J, Houlston RS (2005) Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation analysis of intraocular uveal melanomas identifies distinctive imbalances associated with loss of chromosome 3. Br J Cancer 93:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund M, Gisselsson D, Hansen GB, White VA, Säll T, Mitelman F, Horsman D (2004) Dissecting karyotypic patterns in malignant melanomas: temporal clustering of losses and gains in melanoma karyotypic evolution. Int J Cancer 108:57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic E, Naus NC, van Gils W, Klaver CC, van Til ME, Verbiest MM, Stijnen T, Mooy CM, Paridaens D, Beverloo HB, Luyten GP, de Klein A (2005) Concurrent loss of chromosome arm 1p and chromosome 3 predicts a decreased disease-free survival in uveal melanoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2253–2257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivelä T, Eskelin S, Kujala E (2006) Metastatic uveal melanoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 46:133–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maat W, Jordanova ES, van Zelderen-Bhola SL, Barthen ER, Wessels HW, Schalij-Delfos NE, Jager MJ (2007) The heterogeneous distribution of monosomy 3 in uveal melanomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:91–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midena E, Bonaldi L, Parrozzani R, Tebaldi E, Boccassini B, Vujosevic S (2006) In vivo detection of monosomy 3 in eyes with medium-sized uveal melanoma using transscleral fine needle aspiration biopsy. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:422–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mudhar HS, Parsons MA, Sisley K, Rundle P, Singh A, Rennie IG (2004) A critical appraisal of the prognostic and predictive factors for uveal malignant melanoma. Histopathology 45:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naus NC, Verhoeven ACA, van Drunen E, Slater R, Mooy CM, Paridaens DA, Luyten GPM, de Klein A (2002) Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clin Cancer Res 8:534–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onken MD, Worley LA, Person E, Char DH, Bowcock AM, Harbur JM (2007) Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 3 detected with single nucleotide polimorphisms is superior to monosomy 3 for predicting metastasis in uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:2923–2927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parella P, Sidransky D, Merbs SL (1999) Allelotype of posterior uveal melanoma: implications for a bifurcated tumor progression pathway. Cancer Res 59:3032–3037

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescher G, Bornfeld N, Hirche H, Horsthemke B, Jöckel KH, Becher R (1996) Prognostic implications of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma. Lancet 347:1222–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandinha T, Farquharson M, McKay I, Roberts F (2006) Correlation of heterogeneity for chromosome 3 copy number with cell type in choroidal melanoma of mixed-cell type. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5177–5180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sisley K, Rennie IG, Parsons MA, Jacques R, Hammond DW, Bell SM, Potter AM, Rees RC (1997) Abnormalities of chromosomes 3 and 8 in posterior uveal melanoma correlate with prognosis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 19:22–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisley K, Nichols C, Parsons MA, Farr R, Rees RC, Rennie IG (1998) Clinical applications of chromosome analysis, from fine needle aspiration biopsies, of posterior uveal melanomas. Eye 12:203–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sisley K, Tattersall N, Dayson M, Smith K, Mudhar HS, Rennie IG (2006) Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies novel rearrangements of chromosomes 6, 15, and 18 in primary uveal melanoma. Exp Eye Res 83:554–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White VA, Chambers JD, Courtright PD, Chang WY, Horsman DE (1998a) Correlation of cytogenetic abnormalities with the outcome of patients with uveal melanoma. Cancer 83:354–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White VA, McNeil KB, Horsman DE (1998b) Acquired homozygosity (isodisomy) of chromosome 3 in uveal melanoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 102:40–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White JS, Becker RL, McLean IW, Director-Myska AE, Nath J (2006) Molecular cytogenetic evaluation of 10 uveal melanomas cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 168:11–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs. Colette Case for help in the preparation of this manuscript. R. Marcato and E. Tebaldi are recipients of an Istituto Oncologico Veneto fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Bonaldi.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC); Federazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FIRC); PRIN; MUR ex-60%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonaldi, L., Midena, E., Filippi, B. et al. FISH analysis of chromosomes 3 and 6 on fine needle aspiration biopsy samples identifies distinct subgroups of uveal melanomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134, 1123–1127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0382-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0382-6

Keywords

Navigation