Abstract
Purpose: As inactivation of p53 may be correlated with poor response of tumors to chemo- and/or radiotherapy the presence of p53 mutations in exons 5–8 was determined in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). As p53 protein phosphorylation at serine 15 indicates stabilization and protection against mdm-2 the presence of this phosphorylation state was subsequently evaluated. Methods: Mutations in exons 5–8 were analyzed by denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and subsequent sequence analysis in pretherapeutic biopsies of 38 adenocarcinomas of the GEJ that had undergone multimodal treatment in the course of a prospective multicentric phase III trial. The presence of p53 protein phosphorylation at serine 15 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results: Mutations in the DNA binding region were found in 23 samples and were only weakly associated with worse 2-year survival (P=0.083). Phosphorylation at serine 15 of p53 was detected in 14 samples, being neither associated with p53 mutation nor with patient’s survival. Conclusion: This allows the conclusion that the determination of these two parameters does not help to select patients who do profit from multimodal treatment for adenocarcinomas of the GEJ.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GEJ:
-
Gastroesophageal junction
- DHPLC:
-
Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- TE:
-
Tris/EDTA
References
Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K, Guldberg P, Sehested M, Nesland JM, Lukas C, Orntoft T, Lukas J, Bartek J (2005) DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434:864–870
Blagosklonny MV (2000) p53 From complexity to simplicity: mutant p53 stabilization, gain-of-function, and dominant-negative effect. FASEB J 14:1901–1907
Bourdon JC, Laurenzi VD, Melino G, Lane D (2003) p53: 25 years of research and more questions to answer. Cell Death Differ 10:397–399
Carbone D, Chiba I, Mitsudomi T (1991) Polymorphism at codon 213 within the p53 gene. Oncogene 9:1691–1692
Fridman JS, Lowe SW (2003) Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22:9030–9040
Gao C, Nakajima T, Taya Y, Tsuchida N (1999) Activation of p53 in MDM2-overexpressing cells through phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 264:860–864
Gibson MK, Abraham SC, Wu TT, Burtness B, Heitmiller RF, Heath E, Forastiere A (2003) Epidermal growth factor receptor, p53 mutation, and pathological response predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 9:6461–6468
Gleeson CM, Sloan JM, McManus DT, Maxwell P, Arthur K, McGuigan JA, Ritchie AJ, Russell SE (1998) Comparison of p53 and DNA content abnormalities in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Br J Cancer 77:277–286
Ireland AP, Shibata DK, Chandrasoma P, Lord RV, Peters JH, DeMeester TR (2000) Clinical significance of p53 mutations in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia. Ann Surg 231:179–187
Jenkins GJ, Doak SH, Parry JM, D’Souza FR, Griffiths AP, Baxter JN (2002) Genetic pathways involved in the progression of Barrett’s metaplasia to adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 89:824–837
Keller G, Hartmann A, Müller J, Höfler H (2001) Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) for the analysis of somatic p53 mutations. Lab Invest 81:1735–1737
Krasna MJ, Mao YS, Sonett JR, Tamura G, Jones R, Suntharalingam M, Meltzer SJ (1999) p53 Gene protein overexpression predicts results of trimodality therapy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2021–2024
Leonard GD, McCaffrey JA, Maher M (2003) Optimal therapy for oesophageal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 29:275–282
Muro K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Chin K, Oda Y, Fujii T, Hosokawa K, Yoshida S, Hasebe T (1996) Association of p53 protein expression with responses and survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 26:65–69
Ribeiro U Jr, Finkelstein SD, Safatle-Ribeiro AV et al (1998) p53 sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 83:7–18
Sarbia M, Stahl M, Fink U, Willers R, Seeber S, Gabbert HE (1998) Expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins and outcome of esophageal cancer patients treated by combined therapy modalities. Clin Cancer Res 4:2991–2997
Sarbia M, Arjumand J, Wolter M, Reifenberger G, Heep H, Gabbert HE (2001) Frequent c-myc amplification in high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Clin Path 115:835–840
Seitz JF, Perrier H, Monges G, Giovannini M, Gouvernet J (1995) Multivariate analysis of the prognostic and predictive factors of response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in epidermoid cancers of the esophagus. Value of immunodetection of protein p53. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19:465–474
Shieh SY, Ikeda M, Taya Y, Prives C (1997) DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell 91:325–334
Siewert JR, Stein H (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction. Br J Cancer 85:1457–1459
Soontrapornchai P, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Hamdorf JM, House AK, Iacopetta B (1999) TP53 gene mutation status in pretreatment biopsies of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has no prognostic value. Eur J Cancer 35:1683–1687
Stahl M, Vanhoefer U, Stuschke M, Walz MK, Muller C, Wilke H (1998) Pre-operative sequential chemo- and radiochemotherapy in locally advanced carcinomas of the lower oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. Eur J Cancer 34:668–673
Acknowledgements
We thank Annette Haas for her excellent technical assistance. M. Sarbia was supported by Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung, Grant No 5110079.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pühringer-Oppermann, F., Stahl, M., Keller, G. et al. Lack of prognostic impact of p53 gene mutation and p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 in multimodally treated adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132, 433–438 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-006-0085-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-006-0085-9