Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lack of prognostic impact of p53 gene mutation and p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 in multimodally treated adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: As inactivation of p53 may be correlated with poor response of tumors to chemo- and/or radiotherapy the presence of p53 mutations in exons 5–8 was determined in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). As p53 protein phosphorylation at serine 15 indicates stabilization and protection against mdm-2 the presence of this phosphorylation state was subsequently evaluated. Methods: Mutations in exons 5–8 were analyzed by denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and subsequent sequence analysis in pretherapeutic biopsies of 38 adenocarcinomas of the GEJ that had undergone multimodal treatment in the course of a prospective multicentric phase III trial. The presence of p53 protein phosphorylation at serine 15 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results: Mutations in the DNA binding region were found in 23 samples and were only weakly associated with worse 2-year survival (P=0.083). Phosphorylation at serine 15 of p53 was detected in 14 samples, being neither associated with p53 mutation nor with patient’s survival. Conclusion: This allows the conclusion that the determination of these two parameters does not help to select patients who do profit from multimodal treatment for adenocarcinomas of the GEJ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GEJ:

Gastroesophageal junction

DHPLC:

Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

TE:

Tris/EDTA

References

  • Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K, Guldberg P, Sehested M, Nesland JM, Lukas C, Orntoft T, Lukas J, Bartek J (2005) DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434:864–870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blagosklonny MV (2000) p53 From complexity to simplicity: mutant p53 stabilization, gain-of-function, and dominant-negative effect. FASEB J 14:1901–1907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon JC, Laurenzi VD, Melino G, Lane D (2003) p53: 25 years of research and more questions to answer. Cell Death Differ 10:397–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone D, Chiba I, Mitsudomi T (1991) Polymorphism at codon 213 within the p53 gene. Oncogene 9:1691–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridman JS, Lowe SW (2003) Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22:9030–9040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao C, Nakajima T, Taya Y, Tsuchida N (1999) Activation of p53 in MDM2-overexpressing cells through phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 264:860–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson MK, Abraham SC, Wu TT, Burtness B, Heitmiller RF, Heath E, Forastiere A (2003) Epidermal growth factor receptor, p53 mutation, and pathological response predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 9:6461–6468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson CM, Sloan JM, McManus DT, Maxwell P, Arthur K, McGuigan JA, Ritchie AJ, Russell SE (1998) Comparison of p53 and DNA content abnormalities in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Br J Cancer 77:277–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland AP, Shibata DK, Chandrasoma P, Lord RV, Peters JH, DeMeester TR (2000) Clinical significance of p53 mutations in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia. Ann Surg 231:179–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GJ, Doak SH, Parry JM, D’Souza FR, Griffiths AP, Baxter JN (2002) Genetic pathways involved in the progression of Barrett’s metaplasia to adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 89:824–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller G, Hartmann A, Müller J, Höfler H (2001) Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) for the analysis of somatic p53 mutations. Lab Invest 81:1735–1737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krasna MJ, Mao YS, Sonett JR, Tamura G, Jones R, Suntharalingam M, Meltzer SJ (1999) p53 Gene protein overexpression predicts results of trimodality therapy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2021–2024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard GD, McCaffrey JA, Maher M (2003) Optimal therapy for oesophageal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 29:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muro K, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Chin K, Oda Y, Fujii T, Hosokawa K, Yoshida S, Hasebe T (1996) Association of p53 protein expression with responses and survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 26:65–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro U Jr, Finkelstein SD, Safatle-Ribeiro AV et al (1998) p53 sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 83:7–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbia M, Stahl M, Fink U, Willers R, Seeber S, Gabbert HE (1998) Expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins and outcome of esophageal cancer patients treated by combined therapy modalities. Clin Cancer Res 4:2991–2997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbia M, Arjumand J, Wolter M, Reifenberger G, Heep H, Gabbert HE (2001) Frequent c-myc amplification in high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Clin Path 115:835–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz JF, Perrier H, Monges G, Giovannini M, Gouvernet J (1995) Multivariate analysis of the prognostic and predictive factors of response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in epidermoid cancers of the esophagus. Value of immunodetection of protein p53. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19:465–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh SY, Ikeda M, Taya Y, Prives C (1997) DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell 91:325–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Stein H (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction. Br J Cancer 85:1457–1459

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soontrapornchai P, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Hamdorf JM, House AK, Iacopetta B (1999) TP53 gene mutation status in pretreatment biopsies of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has no prognostic value. Eur J Cancer 35:1683–1687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl M, Vanhoefer U, Stuschke M, Walz MK, Muller C, Wilke H (1998) Pre-operative sequential chemo- and radiochemotherapy in locally advanced carcinomas of the lower oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. Eur J Cancer 34:668–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Annette Haas for her excellent technical assistance. M. Sarbia was supported by Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung, Grant No 5110079.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Sarbia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pühringer-Oppermann, F., Stahl, M., Keller, G. et al. Lack of prognostic impact of p53 gene mutation and p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 in multimodally treated adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132, 433–438 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-006-0085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-006-0085-9

Keywords

Navigation