Abstract
The oxygenation index (OI) is widely used to assess disease severity in pediatric ARDS; however, it relies on mean airway pressure (Pmean), which does not reflect lung-distending forces relevant to ventilator-induced lung injury. Driving pressure (DP) is a determinant of lung strain. We developed and evaluated the oxygenation distension index (ODI) by substituting DP for Pmean in the OI formula. This observational study included children aged 1 month to 18 years with PARDS requiring ≥ 24 h of invasive mechanical ventilation in six centers. Lung ultrasound scores (LUS) and respiratory mechanics, including transpulmonary pressure (PL), transpulmonary driving pressure (DPL), mechanical power (MP), and transpulmonary mechanical power (MPL), were assessed 4–24 h after diagnosis according to PALICC-2 recommendations. Associations of OI and ODI with lung injury markers and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Among 56 patients, 41 (73%) had mild-to-moderate and 15 (27%) had severe PARDS. ODI demonstrated stronger correlations than OI with lung injury markers, including LUS (r = 0.818 vs. 0.501), PL (r = 0.779 vs. 0.697), DPL (r = 0.745 vs. 0.671), MP normalized to predicted body weight (r = 0.518 vs. 0.438), and MPL normalized to predicted body weight (r = 0.634 vs. 0.628). For 30-day mortality prediction, ODI showed higher discriminative performance than OI (AUC 0.740 [95% CI, 0.598–0.866] vs. 0.685 [95% CI, 0.535–0.835]; DeLong p = 0.040).
Conclusions: By incorporating driving pressure, ODI more closely reflects lung injury severity than the conventional oxygenation index and improves discrimination for mortality in PARDS.
What is Known: • The oxygenation index is the standard metric used for severity classification in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. • Driving pressure has been increasingly recognized as a key physiological determinant of lung injury and clinical outcomes in ARDS. |
What is New: • A driving pressure–based oxygenation metric, the oxygenation distension index (ODI), shows stronger associations with established markers of lung injury than the conventional oxygenation index in PARDS. • ODI provides improved discrimination for 30-day mortality compared with the oxygenation index in mechanically ventilated children with PARDS. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Individual patient-level data cannot be shared publicly due to ethical and privacy considerations.
Change history
08 April 2026
The original online version of this article was revised due to a typographical error in the section heading, where "Discussion" was incorrectly displayed as "Dıscussıon".
Abbreviations
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- DP:
-
Driving pressure
- DPL:
-
Transpulmonary driving pressure
- ECW:
-
Chest wall elastance
- EL:
-
Lung elastance
- EResp:
-
Respiratory system elastance
- FiO₂:
-
Fraction of inspired oxygen
- LUS:
-
Lung ultrasound score
- MP:
-
Mechanical power
- MPL:
-
Transpulmonary mechanical power
- ODI:
-
Oxygenation distension index
- OI:
-
Oxygenation index
- PALICC:
-
Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference
- PARDS:
-
Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome
- PBW:
-
Predicted body weight
- Pes:
-
Esophageal pressure
- PICU:
-
Pediatric intensive care unit
- PL:
-
Transpulmonary pressure
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- VFD:
-
Ventilator-free days
References
Sapru A, Flori H, Quasney MW, Dahmer MK (2015) Pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference group. Pathobiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16(5_suppl 1):S6–S22
Heidemann SM, Nair A, Bulut Y, Sapru A (2017) Pathophysiology and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 64(5):1017–1037
Kneyber MCJ, Khemani RG, Bhalla A et al (2023) Understanding clinical and biological heterogeneity to advance precision medicine in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 11(2):197–212
Khemani RG, Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ et al (2015) Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, incidence, and epidemiology—proceedings from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16(5_suppl 1):S23–S40
Emeriaud G, López-Fernández YM, Iyer NP et al (2023) Executive summary of the second international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PALICC-2). Pediatr Crit Care Med 24(2):143–168
Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS et al (2015) Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 372(8):747–755
van Schelven P, Koopman AA, Burgerhof JGM et al (2022) Driving pressure is associated with outcome in pediatric acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 23(3):e136–e144
Ceylan G, Topal S, Atakul G et al (2021) Randomized crossover trial to compare driving pressures in a closed-loop and a conventional mechanical ventilation mode in pediatric patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 56(9):3035–3043
Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G et al (2016) Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med 42:1360–1373
Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Khirani S, Khemani R et al (2023) Pleural and transpulmonary pressures to tailor protective ventilation in children. Thorax 78(1):97–105
Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M et al (2016) Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med 42(10):1567–1575
Percy AG, Mai MV, Bhalla AK, Yehya N (2023) Mechanical power is associated with mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 24(7):e307–e316
Shaikh FAR, Ramaswamy KN, Chirla DK, Venkataraman ST, Kneyber MCJ (2024) Mechanical power and normalized mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Pediatr 12:1293639
Khemani RG, Smith L, Lopez-Fernandez YM et al (2019) Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome incidence and epidemiology (PARDIE): an international observational study. Lancet Respir Med 7(2):141–151
Arnal JM, Saoli M, Garnero A (2020) Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Heart Lung 49(4):427–434
Oulego-Erroz I, Del Pilar De Castro-Vecino M, González-Cortés R et al (2020) Lung ultrasound score and severity of acute lung disease in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 201(9):1162–1170
Chen L, Chen GQ, Shore K et al (2017) Implementing a bedside assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 21(1):84
Chen L, Grieco DL, Beloncle F et al (2022) Partition of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and association with outcome: a multicentre clinical study. Intensive Care Med 48(7):888–898
Roldán R, Barriga F, Villamonte R et al (2023) Use of the oxygenation stretch index to predict outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Respir Care 68(12):1683–1692
Mojoli F, Torriglia F, Orlando A et al (2018) Technical aspects of bedside respiratory monitoring of transpulmonary pressure. Ann Transl Med 6(19):377
Scaramuzzo G, Spadaro S, Spinelli E et al (2021) Calculation of transpulmonary pressure from regional ventilation displayed by electrical impedance tomography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Physiol 12:693736
Bhalla AK, Klein MJ, Modesto I, Alapont V et al (2022) Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study. Crit Care 26(1):2
Zou GY (2007) Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychol Methods 12(4):399–413
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845
Zou L, Choi YH, Guizzetti L, Shu D, Zou J, Zou G (2024) Extending the delong algorithm for comparing areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves with missing data. Stat Med 43(21):4148–4162
Lombardi Y, Azoyan L, Szychowiak P et al (2021) AP-HP/Universities/INSERM COVID-19 research collaboration, AP-HP COVID CDR Initiative. External validation of prognostic scores for COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized in Greater Paris University Hospitals. Intensive Care Med 47(12):1426–1439
Soydan E, Ceylan G, Atakul G et al (2024) Relationship between driving pressure during the first 24 hours and mortality among pediatric critical care patients. J Turk Soc Intens Care 22(4):256–263
Chiumello D, Chidini G, Calderini E et al (2016) Respiratory mechanics and lung stress/strain in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 6(1):11
Newth CJ, Stretton M, Deakers TW, Hammer J (1997) Assessment of pulmonary function in the early phase of ARDS in pediatric patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 23(3):169–175
Bhalla AK, Klein MJ, Emeriaud G et al (2021) Adherence to lung-protective ventilation principles in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study. Crit Care Med 49(10):1779–1789
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ekin Soydan contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing of the original draft. Gokhan Ceylan contributed to conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing. Ozlem Demirel, Ece Dorsan Yay, Gulhan Atakul, Sevgi Topal, Mustafa Colak, and Pinar Hepduman contributed to investigation and data collection. Ozlem Sarac and Ferhat Sari contributed to investigation and data curation. Utku Karaarslan and Hasan Agin contributed to supervision and resources. Jean-Pierre Revelly contributed to writing—review and editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dr. Behçet Uz Children’s Hospital, İzmir Health Sciences University (Protocol No: 02021/519; Approval Date: January 21, 2023). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all enrolled patients prior to participation. All participating centers obtained local institutional approval where required.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by AKASH DEEP
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to a typographical error in the section heading, where "Discussion" was incorrectly displayed as "Dıscussıon".
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Soydan, E., Ceylan, G., Demirel, O. et al. A novel oxygenation distension index (ODI): a driving pressure–based metric compared with the oxygenation index in pediatric PARDS. Eur J Pediatr 185, 224 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06910-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06910-w


