Skip to main content
Log in

A novel oxygenation distension index (ODI): a driving pressure–based metric compared with the oxygenation index in pediatric PARDS

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

The oxygenation index (OI) is widely used to assess disease severity in pediatric ARDS; however, it relies on mean airway pressure (Pmean), which does not reflect lung-distending forces relevant to ventilator-induced lung injury. Driving pressure (DP) is a determinant of lung strain. We developed and evaluated the oxygenation distension index (ODI) by substituting DP for Pmean in the OI formula. This observational study included children aged 1 month to 18 years with PARDS requiring ≥ 24 h of invasive mechanical ventilation in six centers. Lung ultrasound scores (LUS) and respiratory mechanics, including transpulmonary pressure (PL), transpulmonary driving pressure (DPL), mechanical power (MP), and transpulmonary mechanical power (MPL), were assessed 4–24 h after diagnosis according to PALICC-2 recommendations. Associations of OI and ODI with lung injury markers and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Among 56 patients, 41 (73%) had mild-to-moderate and 15 (27%) had severe PARDS. ODI demonstrated stronger correlations than OI with lung injury markers, including LUS (r = 0.818 vs. 0.501), PL (r = 0.779 vs. 0.697), DPL (r = 0.745 vs. 0.671), MP normalized to predicted body weight (r = 0.518 vs. 0.438), and MPL normalized to predicted body weight (r = 0.634 vs. 0.628). For 30-day mortality prediction, ODI showed higher discriminative performance than OI (AUC 0.740 [95% CI, 0.598–0.866] vs. 0.685 [95% CI, 0.535–0.835]; DeLong p = 0.040).

Conclusions: By incorporating driving pressure, ODI more closely reflects lung injury severity than the conventional oxygenation index and improves discrimination for mortality in PARDS.

What is Known:

The oxygenation index is the standard metric used for severity classification in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Driving pressure has been increasingly recognized as a key physiological determinant of lung injury and clinical outcomes in ARDS.

What is New:

A driving pressure–based oxygenation metric, the oxygenation distension index (ODI), shows stronger associations with established markers of lung injury than the conventional oxygenation index in PARDS.

ODI provides improved discrimination for 30-day mortality compared with the oxygenation index in mechanically ventilated children with PARDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Individual patient-level data cannot be shared publicly due to ethical and privacy considerations.

Change history

  • 08 April 2026

    The original online version of this article was revised due to a typographical error in the section heading, where "Discussion" was incorrectly displayed as "Dıscussıon".

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

DP:

Driving pressure

DPL:

Transpulmonary driving pressure

ECW:

Chest wall elastance

EL:

Lung elastance

EResp:

Respiratory system elastance

FiO₂:

Fraction of inspired oxygen

LUS:

Lung ultrasound score

MP:

Mechanical power

MPL:

Transpulmonary mechanical power

ODI:

Oxygenation distension index

OI:

Oxygenation index

PALICC:

Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

PARDS:

Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

PBW:

Predicted body weight

Pes:

Esophageal pressure

PICU:

Pediatric intensive care unit

PL:

Transpulmonary pressure

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

VFD:

Ventilator-free days

References

  1. Sapru A, Flori H, Quasney MW, Dahmer MK (2015) Pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference group. Pathobiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16(5_suppl 1):S6–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heidemann SM, Nair A, Bulut Y, Sapru A (2017) Pathophysiology and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 64(5):1017–1037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kneyber MCJ, Khemani RG, Bhalla A et al (2023) Understanding clinical and biological heterogeneity to advance precision medicine in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 11(2):197–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khemani RG, Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ et al (2015) Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, incidence, and epidemiology—proceedings from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16(5_suppl 1):S23–S40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emeriaud G, López-Fernández YM, Iyer NP et al (2023) Executive summary of the second international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PALICC-2). Pediatr Crit Care Med 24(2):143–168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS et al (2015) Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 372(8):747–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Schelven P, Koopman AA, Burgerhof JGM et al (2022) Driving pressure is associated with outcome in pediatric acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 23(3):e136–e144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ceylan G, Topal S, Atakul G et al (2021) Randomized crossover trial to compare driving pressures in a closed-loop and a conventional mechanical ventilation mode in pediatric patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 56(9):3035–3043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G et al (2016) Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med 42:1360–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Khirani S, Khemani R et al (2023) Pleural and transpulmonary pressures to tailor protective ventilation in children. Thorax 78(1):97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M et al (2016) Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med 42(10):1567–1575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Percy AG, Mai MV, Bhalla AK, Yehya N (2023) Mechanical power is associated with mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 24(7):e307–e316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaikh FAR, Ramaswamy KN, Chirla DK, Venkataraman ST, Kneyber MCJ (2024) Mechanical power and normalized mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Pediatr 12:1293639

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Khemani RG, Smith L, Lopez-Fernandez YM et al (2019) Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome incidence and epidemiology (PARDIE): an international observational study. Lancet Respir Med 7(2):141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnal JM, Saoli M, Garnero A (2020) Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Heart Lung 49(4):427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oulego-Erroz I, Del Pilar De Castro-Vecino M, González-Cortés R et al (2020) Lung ultrasound score and severity of acute lung disease in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 201(9):1162–1170

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen L, Chen GQ, Shore K et al (2017) Implementing a bedside assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 21(1):84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen L, Grieco DL, Beloncle F et al (2022) Partition of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and association with outcome: a multicentre clinical study. Intensive Care Med 48(7):888–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roldán R, Barriga F, Villamonte R et al (2023) Use of the oxygenation stretch index to predict outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Respir Care 68(12):1683–1692

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mojoli F, Torriglia F, Orlando A et al (2018) Technical aspects of bedside respiratory monitoring of transpulmonary pressure. Ann Transl Med 6(19):377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Scaramuzzo G, Spadaro S, Spinelli E et al (2021) Calculation of transpulmonary pressure from regional ventilation displayed by electrical impedance tomography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Physiol 12:693736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhalla AK, Klein MJ, Modesto I, Alapont V et al (2022) Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study. Crit Care 26(1):2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zou GY (2007) Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychol Methods 12(4):399–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zou L, Choi YH, Guizzetti L, Shu D, Zou J, Zou G (2024) Extending the delong algorithm for comparing areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves with missing data. Stat Med 43(21):4148–4162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lombardi Y, Azoyan L, Szychowiak P et al (2021) AP-HP/Universities/INSERM COVID-19 research collaboration, AP-HP COVID CDR Initiative. External validation of prognostic scores for COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized in Greater Paris University Hospitals. Intensive Care Med 47(12):1426–1439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Soydan E, Ceylan G, Atakul G et al (2024) Relationship between driving pressure during the first 24 hours and mortality among pediatric critical care patients. J Turk Soc Intens Care 22(4):256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chiumello D, Chidini G, Calderini E et al (2016) Respiratory mechanics and lung stress/strain in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 6(1):11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Newth CJ, Stretton M, Deakers TW, Hammer J (1997) Assessment of pulmonary function in the early phase of ARDS in pediatric patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 23(3):169–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhalla AK, Klein MJ, Emeriaud G et al (2021) Adherence to lung-protective ventilation principles in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study. Crit Care Med 49(10):1779–1789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ekin Soydan contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing of the original draft. Gokhan Ceylan contributed to conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing. Ozlem Demirel, Ece Dorsan Yay, Gulhan Atakul, Sevgi Topal, Mustafa Colak, and Pinar Hepduman contributed to investigation and data collection. Ozlem Sarac and Ferhat Sari contributed to investigation and data curation. Utku Karaarslan and Hasan Agin contributed to supervision and resources. Jean-Pierre Revelly contributed to writing—review and editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekin Soydan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dr. Behçet Uz Children’s Hospital, İzmir Health Sciences University (Protocol No: 02021/519; Approval Date: January 21, 2023). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all enrolled patients prior to participation. All participating centers obtained local institutional approval where required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by AKASH DEEP

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a typographical error in the section heading, where "Discussion" was incorrectly displayed as "Dıscussıon".

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soydan, E., Ceylan, G., Demirel, O. et al. A novel oxygenation distension index (ODI): a driving pressure–based metric compared with the oxygenation index in pediatric PARDS. Eur J Pediatr 185, 224 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06910-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06910-w

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Ekin Soydan
  2. Pinar Hepduman