Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twin-block appliance had been advocated as a potential treatment option in paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) due to their favourable effect in enhancing upper airway parameters and improving OSA symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of twin-block appliance therapy on upper airway parameters/dimensions and the apnoea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) in OSA children with class II mandibular retrognathic skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography. This prospective longitudinal study comprised 34 polysomnography-proven OSA growing children with class II mandibular retrognathic skeletal malocclusion between the ages of 8 and 12 years who had completed myofunctional twin-block therapy and matched corresponding controls. The upper airway was segmented into the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx, and the effect of twin-bock treatment on upper airway parameters/dimensions was assessed pre- and posttreatment using CBCT analysis, while a second standard overnight PSG was performed to determine changes in the AHI. At the nasopharynx level, minimal (nonsignificant) increases in all variables were observed within the twin-block group and between the groups (P > 0.05). At the level of the oropharynx, all variables increased significantly in the treatment group and between groups (P < 0.001), but these increases were nonsignificant in the control group. At the level of the hypopharynx, only the minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) increased significantly in the treatment group (P = 0.003). The change in MCA was also significant between the groups (P = 0.041). In addition, the upper airway length increased significantly in the twin-block group (P = 0.0154), and the AHI decreased by 74.8% (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Correction of class II mandibular retrognathic skeletal malocclusion with twin-block appliance resulted in a significant increase in upper airway volume, MCA, anteroposterior and lateral distances of the MCA at the level of the oropharynx, MCA at the level of the hypopharynx and upper airway length, and a significant decrease in AHI, but it had no effect on nasopharynx parameters.

What is Known:

• CBCT imaging has been shown to be an effective and precise diagnostic tool for analyzing the upper airways and craniofacial structures.

• Twin block appliance may be an effective treatment modality in children with OSA.

What is New:

• Minimal cross-sectional area of upper ways may be the most relevant potential parameter when explaining how the upper airway anatomy plays role of in the pathogenesis of pediatric OSA.

• Twin block appliance induced favorable changes in upper airway morphology (oropharynx area mainly) and respiratory parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kaneita Y, Yokoyama E, Harano S, Tamaki T, Suzuki H, Munezawa T, Nakajima H, Asai T, Ohida T (2009) Associations between sleep disturbance and mental health status: a longitudinal study of Japanese junior high school students. Sleep Med 10:780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akinci B, Aslan GK, Kiyan E (2018) Sleep quality and quality of life in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Respir J 12:1739–1746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen ME, Gibson PG, Collins CE, Wood LG (2013) Airway and systemic inflammation in obese children with asthma. Eur Respir J 42:1012–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pretl M, Lattová Z, Polák AP, Westlake K (2019) Metabolic disorders and sleep. Cas Lek Cesk Fall 5:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gulotta G, Iannella G, Vicini C, Polimeni A, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, Visconti IC, Meccariello G, Cammaroto G, De Vito A, Gobbi R, Bellini C, Firinu E, Pace A, Colizza A, Pelucchi S, Magliulo G (2019) Risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children: state of the art. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(18):3235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Zhao T, Ngan P, Qin D, Hua F, He H (2023) The dental and craniofacial characteristics among children with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 45(3):346–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK (2014) Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod 15(1):68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiang M, Hu B, Liu Y, Sun J, Song J (2017) Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 97:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D (2009) Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 107:256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D, Uribe L, Allareddy V, Finkelstein M, Ruprecht A (2013) Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:20130059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tikku T, Khanna R, Sachan K, Agarwal A, Srivastava K, Lal A (2016) Dimensional and volumetric analysis of the oropharyngeal region in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a cone beam computed tomography study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 13:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Behrents RG, Shelgikar AV, Conley RS, Flores-Mir C, Hans M, Levine M, McNamara JA, Palomo JM, Pliska B, Stockstill JW, Wise J, Murphy S, Nagel NJ, Hittner J (2019) Obstructive sleep apnea and orthodontics: an American Association of Orthodontists White Paper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 156(1):13–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. OnemOzbilen E, Yilmaz HN, Kucukkeles N (2019) Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy. Korean J Orthod 49(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Banks P, Wright J, O’Brien K (2004) Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nazarali N, Altalibi M, Nazarali S, Major MP, Flores-Mir C, Major PW (2015) Mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of paediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 37:618–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang C, He H, Ngan P (2013) Effects of twin block appliance on obstructive sleep apnea in children: a preliminary study. Sleep Breath 17:1309–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Umemoto G, Toyoshima H, Yamaguchi Y, Aoyagi N, Yoshimura C, Funakoshi K (2019) Therapeutic efficacy of twin-block and fixed oral appliances in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Prosthodont 28:830–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawton HM, Battagel JM, Kotecha B (2005) A comparison of the Twin Block and Herbst mandibular advancement splints in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a prospective study. Eur J Orthod 27:82–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zreaqat M, Hassan R, Samsudin R, Alforaidi S (2023) Effects of twin-block appliance therapy on urinary leukotriene E4 and serum C-reactive protein levels in obstructive sleep apnea children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a prospective longitudinal study. Indian J Pediatr 90(7):729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Geoghegan F, Ahrens A, McGrath C, Hägg U (2015) An evaluation of two different mandibular advancement devices on craniofacial characteristics and upper airway dimensions of Chinese adult obstructive sleep apnea patients. Angle Orthod 85:962–968

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shete CS, Bhad WA (2017) Three-dimensional upper airway changes with mandibular advancement device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151:941–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Camacho M, Capasso R, Schendel S (2014) Airway changes in obstructive sleep apnoea patients associated with a supine versus an upright position examined using cone beam computed tomography. J Laryngol Otol 128:824–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gurani SF, Di Carlo G, Cattaneo PM, Thorn JJ, Pinholt EM (2016) Effect of head and tongue posture on the pharyngeal airway dimensions and morphology in three-dimensional imaging: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 31:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong AK, Beattie KA, Min KK et al (2015) A trimodality comparison of volumetric bone imaging technologies. Part I: short-term precision and validity. J Clin Densitom 18:124–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez A, Ranallo FN, Judy PF, Gierada DS, Fain SB (2014) CT reconstruction techniques for improved accuracy of lung CT airway measurement. Med Phys 41:111911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Borojeni A, Frank-Ito DO, Kimbell JS, Rhee JS, Garcia GJM (2017) Creation of an idealized nasopharynx geometry for accurate computational fluid dynamics simulations of nasal airflow in patient-specific models lacking the nasopharynx anatomy. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 33:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Izuka EN, Feres MF, Pignatari SS (2015) Immediate impact of rapid maxillary expansion on upper airway dimensions and on the quality of life of mouth breathers. Dental Press J Orthod 20:43–49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang W, Mo SC, Wang L (2018) Changes of airway before and after twin-block treatment in patients with mandibular retrusion. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 27:607–611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haskell JA, McCrillis J, Haskell BS, Scheetz JP (2009) Effects of mandibular advancement device (MAD) on airway dimensions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Semin Orthod 9:132–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwab RJ, Gupta KB, Gefter WB, Metzger LJ, Hoffman EA, Pack AI (1995) Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:1673–1689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ciscar MA, Juan G, Martínez V, Ramón M, Lloret T, Mínguez J, Armengot M, Marín J, Basterra J (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx in OSA patients and healthy subjects. Eur Respir J 17:79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao X, Liu Y, Gao Y (2008) Three-dimensional upper-airway changes associated with various amounts of mandibular advancement in awake apnea patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:661–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Litman RS, Weissend EE, Shrier DA, Ward DS (2002) Morphologic changes in the upper airway of children during awakening from propofol administration. Anesthesiology 96:607–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK (2010) Sagittal mandibular development effects on the dimensions of the awake pharyngeal airway passage. Angle Orthod 80:1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen H, Aarab G, de Ruiter MH, de Lange J, Lobbezoo F, van der Stelt PF (2016) Three-dimensional imaging of the upper airway anatomy in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review. Sleep Med 21:19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Li L, Liu H, Cheng H, Han Y, Wang C, Chen Y, Song J, Liu D (2014) CBCT evaluation of the upper airway morphological changes in growing patients of class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular retrusion using twin block appliance: a comparative research. PLoS ONE 9:94378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Villa MP, Bernkopf E, Pagani J, Broia V, Montesano M, Ronchetti R (2002) Randomized controlled study of an oral jaw-positioning appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with malocclusion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:123–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rongo R, Martina S, Bucci R, Festa P, Galeotti A, AlessandriBonetti G, Michelotti A, D’Antò V (2020) Short-term effects of the Sander bite-jumping appliance on the pharyngeal airways in subjects with skeletal class II malocclusion: a retrospective case-control study. J Oral Rehabil 47(11):1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J (2011) Effects of fixed appliances in correcting angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance–a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 72(4):301–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK (2013) Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod 83(4):728–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sarul M, Nahajowski M, Gawin G, Antoszewska-Smith J (2022) Does daily wear time of twin block reliably predict its efficiency of class II treatment? J Orofac Orthop 83(3):195–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chuang LC, Lian YC, Hervy-Auboiron M, Guilleminault C, Huang YS (2017) Passive myofunctional therapy applied on children with obstructive sleep apnea: a 6- month follow-up. J Formos Med Assoc 116:536–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Campus in Universiti Sains Malaysia (grant code: USM/JEPeM/20060315).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The main conception was proposed by Rani Samsudin and Rozita Hassan. Material preparation, data collection were performed by Maen Zreaqat and Rozita Hassan. Data analysis were performed by Maen Zreaqat and Sahal Alforaidi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Maen Zreaqat and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rozita Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zreaqat, M., Hassan, R., Samsudin, A. et al. Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study. Eur J Pediatr 182, 5501–5510 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05226-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05226-3

Keywords

Navigation