Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Eosinophilia in children: characteristics, etiology and diagnostic algorithm

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eosinophilia is common in children and may be caused by various disorders. Large-cohort studies, including mild cases, are limited in children. This study aimed to reveal underlying etiologies of childhood eosinophilia and to create a diagnostic algorithm. Children (< 18 years) with absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) ≥ 0.5 × 109/L were reviewed from medical files. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values were recorded. Patients were grouped based on the severity of eosinophilia as mild (0.5–1.5 × 109/L), moderate (≥ 1.5 × 109/L) and severe (≥ 5.0 × 109/L). An algorithm was formed to evaluate these patients. We included 1178 children with mild (80.8%), moderate (17.8%) and severe eosinophilia (1.4%). The most common reasons of eosinophilia were allergic diseases (80%), primary immunodeficiency (PID) (8.5%), infectious diseases (5.8%), malignancies (0.8%) and rheumatic diseases (0.7%). Only 0.3% of children presented with idiopatic hypereosinophilic syndrome. Allergic diseases and PIDs were the most common etiologies in mild/moderate and severe groups, respectively. The median duration of eosinophilia was 7.0 (3.0–17.0) months in the study population and was the shortest in severe cases (2.0 (2.0–5.0) months). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated food allergy [OR:1.866, 95%CI:1.225–2.842, p = 0.004] and PIDs [OR:2.200, 95%CI:1.213–3.992, p = 0.009] as independent factors for childhood eosinophilia. A diagnostic algorithm including mild form was presented for childhood eosinophilia.

   Conclusion: Eosinophilia was frequently determined due to secondary causes; allergic diseases in mild/moderate eosinophilia, PIDs in severe group. Etiology of eosinophilia was diverse, and an algorithm concerning the severity of eosinophilia would be practical and rational.

What is Known:

• In children, eosinophilia is common, and mild eosinophilia occurs frequently.

• Malignancies presents frequently with severe eosinophilia.

What is New:

• Primary immunodeficiencies were not a rare cause of eosinophilia, especially in countries such as the Middle East and eastern Mediterranean countries, where the countries consanguineous marriages are common, and should be investigated in children with eosinophilia who do not have allergic or infectious diseases.

• In literature, there are many algorithms about childhood hypereosinophilia. However, mild eosinophilia is extremely important in children. Because all patients with malignancy and most of the patients with rheumatic diseases presented with mild eosinophilia. Therefore, we proposed an algorithm for childhood eosinophilia that includes mild eosinophilia besides moderate and severe cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curtis C, Ogbogu PU (2015) Evaluation and differential diagnosis of persistent marked eosinophilia. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 35:387–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Valent P, Klion AD, Horny H-P et al (2012) Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:607–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Burris D, Rosenberg CE, Schwartz JT et al (2019) Pediatric hypereosinophilia: characteristics, clinical manifestations, and diagnoses. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 7:2750–2758

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams KW, Ware J, Abiodun A, Holland-Thomas NC, Khoury P, Klion AD (2016) Hypereosinophilia in children and adults: a retrospective comparison. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 4:941–947

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim K-M, Bae M-H, Kim Y-M et al (2014) Cause and incidence of eosinophilia in children: a single center study in one year. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2:358–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chipps BE, Murphy KR, Oppenheimer J (2022) 2020 NAEPP Guidelines Update and GINA 2021—Asthma Care Differences, Overlap, and Challenges. J Allerg Clin Immunol Pract 10(1S):S19–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C et al (2019) From ARIA guidelines to the digital transformation of health in rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity. Eur RespirJ 54:1901023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG et al (2014) Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 71:116–132

  9. Halken S, Muraro A, de Silva D et al (2021) EAACI guideline: Preventing the development of food allergy in infants and young children (2020 update). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 32:843–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Broyles AD, Banerji A, Barmettler S et al (2020) Practical guidance for the evaluation and management of drug hypersensitivity: specific drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 8:S16–S116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A et al (2022) Human inborn errors of immunity: 2022 update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J Clin Immunol 42:1473–1507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Eades-Perner AM, Gathmann B, Knerr V et al (2007) The European internet-based patient and research database for primary immunodeficiencies: results 2004–06. Clin Exp Immunol 147:306–312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Picard C, Gaspar HB, Al-Herz W et al (2018) International union of immunological societies: 2017 primary immunodeficiency diseases committee report on inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol 38:96–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niggemann B, Lange L, Finger A, Ziegert M, Müller V, Beyer K (2012) Accurate oral food challenge requires a cumulative dose on a subsequent day. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:261–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Valent P, Klion AD, Horny HP et al (2012) Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:607–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shomali W, Gotlib J (2022) World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 97(1):129–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Butt NM, Lambert J, Ali S et al (2017) Guideline for the investigation and management ofeosinophilia. Br J Haematol 176:553–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leru PM (2019) Eosinophilic disorders: evaluation of current classifcation and diagnostic criteria, proposal of a practical diagnostic algorithm. Clin Transl Allergy 9:36–45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gotlib J (2017) World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 92:1243–1259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiaohong C, Yiping XU, Meiping LU (2016) Clinical characteristics and etiology of children with hypereosinophilia. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban J Zhejiang Univ Sci 45:292–296

  21. Çelik İK, Büyüktiryaki B, Açıkgöz FG et al (2021) Evaluation of Etiological Factors Causing Hypereosinophilia in Children. Turk J Pediatr Dis 15:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz JT, Fulkerson PC (2018) An approach to the evaluation of persistent hypereosinophilia in pediatric patients. Front Immunol 9:1944

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Brigden ML (1999) A practical workup for eosinophilia: you can investigate the most likely causes right in your office. Postgrad Med 105:193–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kovalszki A, Weller PF (2016) Eosinophilia. Prim Care 43:607–617

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kasap N, Celik V, Isik S et al (2021) A set of clinical and laboratory markers differentiates hyper-IgE syndrome from severe atopic dermatitis. Clin Immunol 223:108645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Navabi B, Upton JEM (2016) Primary immunodeficiencies associated with eosinophilia. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 12:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergmann MM, Caubet J-C, Boguniewicz M, Eigenmann PA (2013) Evaluation of food allergy in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 1:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pilania RK, Chaudhary H, Jindal AK, Rawat A, Singh S (2020) Current status and prospects of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Asia. Genes Dis 7:3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams KW, Milner JD, Freeman AF (2015) Eosinophilia associated with disorders of immune deficiency or immune dysregulation. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 35:523–544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Halken S, Muraro A, de Silva D et al (2021) EAACI guideline: Preventing the development of food allergy in infants and young children (2020 update). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 32:843–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Davido B, de Truchis P, Dinh A (2019) Interest of Eosinophil Count in Bacterial Infections to Predict Antimicrobial Therapy Efficacy. JAMA Surg 154:464–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chusid MJ (1999) Eosinophilia in childhood. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 19:327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Patel L, Garvey B, Arnon S, Roberts IA (1994) Eosinophilia in newborn infants Acta Pædiatr 83:797–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. López-Hurtado M, Arteaga-Troncoso G, Sosa-González IE, Haro-Cruz MJ, Flores-Salazar VR, Guerra-Infante FM (2016) Eosinophilia in Preterm Born Infants Infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 35:149–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Da-Woon K, Myung-Geun S, Hyeong-Kee Y et al (2009) Incidence and causes of hypereosinophilia in the patients of a university hospital. Korean J Leg Med 29(3):185–193

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mehraj V, Hatcher J, Akhtar S, Rafique G, Beg MA (2008) Prevalence and factors associated with intestinal parasitic infection among children in an urban slum of Karachi. PLoS ONE 3:e3680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey C, Lopez S, Camero A, Taiquiri C, Arhuay Y, Moore DAJ (2013) Factors associated with parasitic infection amongst street children in orphanages across Lima. Peru Pathog Glob Health 107:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Acar M, Sutcu M, Umur O et al (2017) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome in differential diagnosis of hyper-ige-immunoglobulinemia: pediatric case report. J Trop Pediatr 63:82–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rezamand A, Ghorashi Z, Ghorashi S, Nezami N (2013) Eosinophilic presentation of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Case Rep 14:143–146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang SA (2019) The diagnostic work-up of hypereosinophilia. Pathobiology 86:39–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Pınar Gür Çetinkaya, Saliha Esenboga and Elif Soyak Aytekin. Data analysis was performed by Pınar Gür Çetinkaya and Ozge Soyer. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Pınar Gür Çetinkaya and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozge Soyer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University School of Medicine (Date: 2021/Approval No: 2021/06-46).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cetinkaya, P.G., Aytekin, E.S., Esenboga, S. et al. Eosinophilia in children: characteristics, etiology and diagnostic algorithm. Eur J Pediatr 182, 2833–2842 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04961-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04961-x

Keywords

Navigation