Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exposure to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 and gross motor function in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air pollution exposure has been related to negative gross motor development in children. However, there is currently a lack of conclusive evidence for such a relationship. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria to examine whether exposure to air pollution has an impact on children’s gross motor development. Of the 9746 papers found, 7 studies examined the impact of air pollutant characteristics, such as PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, on children’s gross motor development. The results of the study reveal a significant association between air pollutants and an increased likelihood of negative gross motor development. PM10 was discovered to be considerably riskier for children’s gross motor development (effect: − 1.83, 95% CI: − 3.04, − 0.62, p value = 0.002). Additionally, NO2 exhibited indications of a tendency to be connected to a detrimental impact on children's gross motor development (effect − 0.18, 95% CI: − 0.42, 0.07, p value = 0.097).

  Conclusion: Our study indicates that exposure to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2, especially PM2.5 and PM10, is negatively associated with children’s gross motor development. However, further research is required to determine how exposure to prenatal air pollution affects children’s gross motor development.

What is Known - What is New:

• In this study, we provide an overview of emerging data related to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 exposure in child development, especially on the gross motor function that continues to emerge, and key findings are highlighted.

• Additionally, we summarize the evidence on the underlying effect of air pollution on gross motor function from human studies..

• Overall, we emphasize that evidence from human studies is critical in suggesting detrimental child health outcomes of an action to promote preventive strategies that will effectively protect children's health..

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ADHD:

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

IQ:

Intelligence quotient

NOS:

Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

BSID:

Bayley Scales of Infant Development

MSCA:

McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities

ASQ:

Ages and Stages Questionnaire 

MIDI:

Minnesota Infant Development Inventory 

SDD:

Suspected Developmental Delay

References

  1. Parasin N, Amnuaylojaroen T, Saokaew S (2021) Effect of air pollution on obesity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Children 8(5):327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Morales E, Julvez J, Torrent M, de Cid R, Guxens M, Bustamante M et al (2009) Association of early life exposure to household gas appliances and indoor nitrogen dioxide with cognition and attention behavior in preschoolers. Am J Epidemiol 169(11):1327–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pagalan L, Bickford C, Weikum W, Lanphear B, Brauer M, Lanphear N et al (2019) Association of prenatal exposure to air pollution with autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Pediatr 173(1):86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suades-González E, Gascon M, Guxens M, Sunyer J (2015) Air pollution and neuropsychological development: a review of the latest evidence. Endocrinology 156(10):3473–3482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan Y, Yang R, Zhao J, Cao Z, Chen Y, Zhang B (2017) The associations between air pollution and adverse pregnancy outcomes in China. Adv Exp Med Biol 1017:181–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Huang S, Jiao A et al (2017) Association between ambient fine particulate matter and preterm birth or term low birth weight: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 227:596–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Markevych I, Tesch F, Datzmann T, Romanos M, Schmitt J, Heinrich J (2018) Outdoor air pollution, greenspace, and incidence of ADHD: a semi-individual study. Sci Total Environ 15(642):1362–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Porta D, Narduzzi S, Badaloni C et al (2016) Air pollution and cognitive development at age 7 in a prospective italian birth cohort. Epidemiology 27(2):228–36

  9. Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Rivas I, López-Vicente M, Suades-González E, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Cirach M, de Castro M, Esnaola M, Basagaña X, Dadvand P et al (2017) Impact of commuting exposure to traffic-related air pollution on cognitive development in children walking to school. Environ Pollut 231:837–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saenen ND, Provost EB, Viaene MK, Vanpoucke C, Lefebvre W, Vrijens K, Roels HA, Nawrot TS (2016) Recent versus chronic exposure to particulate matter air pollution in association with neurobehavioral performance in a panel study of primary schoolchildren. Environ Int 95:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.07.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guxens M, Garcia-Esteban R, Giorgis-Allemand L, Forns J, Badaloni C, Ballester F et al (2014) Air pollution during pregnancy and childhood cognitive and psychomotor development: six European birth cohorts. Epidemiology 636–47

  12. Kim E, Park H, Hong Y-C, Ha M, Kim Y, Kim B-N et al (2014) Prenatal exposure to PM10 and NO2 and children’s neurodevelopment from birth to 24 months of age: Mothers and Children’s Environmental Health (MOCEH) study. Sci Total Environ 481:439–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lertxundi A, Andiarena A, Martínez MD, Ayerdi M, Murcia M, Estarlich M et al (2019) Prenatal exposure to PM2. 5 and NO2 and sex-dependent infant cognitive and motor development. Environ Res 174:114–21

  14. Lertxundi A, Baccini M, Lertxundi N, Fano E, Aranbarri A, Martínez MD et al (2015) Exposure to fine particle matter, nitrogen dioxide and benzene during pregnancy and cognitive and psychomotor developments in children at 15 months of age. Environ Int 80:33–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marrus N, Eggebrecht AT, Todorov A, Elison JT, Wolff JJ, Cole L, Gao W, Pandey J, Shen MD, Swanson MR, Emerson RW (2018) Walking, gross motor development, and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers. Cereb Cortex 28(2):750–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang X, Spear E, Gennings C, Curtin PC, Just AC, Bragg JB et al (2020) The association of prenatal exposure to intensive traffic with early preterm infant neurobehavioral development as reflected by the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Environ Res 183:109204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bayley N (1993) Bayley scales of infant development (Bsid-II). Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piek JP, Hands B, Licari MK (2012) Assessment of motor functioning in the preschool period. Neuropsychol Rev 22(4):402–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths A, Toovey R, Morgan PE, Spittle AJ (2018) Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review. BMJ Open 8(10):e021734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford

  21. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang P, Zhao Y, Li J, Zhou Y, Luo R, Meng X, Zhang Y (2021) Prenatal exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and early childhood neurodevelopment: A population-based birth cohort study. Sci Total Environ 1(785):147334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Liao J, Hu C, Bao S, Mahai G, Cao Z, Lin C, Xia W, Xu S, Li Y (2021) Preconceptional and the first trimester exposure to PM2. 5 and offspring neurodevelopment at 24 months of age: examining mediation by maternal thyroid hormones in a birth cohort study. Environ Pollut 1(284):117133

  25. Hurtado-Díaz M, Riojas-Rodríguez H, Rothenberg SJ, Schnaas-Arrieta L, Kloog I, Just A, Hernández-Bonilla D, Wright RO, Téllez-Rojo MM (2021) Prenatal PM2. 5 exposure and neurodevelopment at 2 years of age in a birth cohort from Mexico city. Int J Hyg Environ Health 233:113695

  26. Block ML, Calderón-Garcidueñas L (2009) Air pollution: mechanisms of neuroinflammation and CNS disease. Trends Neurosci 32(9):506–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters A, Veronesi B, Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Gehr P, Chen LC, Geiser M et al (2006) Translocation and potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update. Part Fibre Toxicol 3(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Villarreal-Calderón A, Acuña H, Villarreal-Calderón J, Garduño M, Henríquez-Roldán CF, Calderón-Garcidueñas L et al (2002) Assessment of physical education time and after-school outdoor time in elementary and middle school students in south Mexico City: the dilemma between physical fitness and the adverse health effects of outdoor pollutant exposure. Arch Environ Health Int J 57(5):450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Donaldson K (2003) The biological effects of coarse and fine particulate matter. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, pp 313–314

  30. Bennett WD, Zeman KL (2005) Effect of race on fine particle deposition for oral and nasal breathing. Inhalation Toxicol 17(12):641–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Mora-Tiscareño A, Ontiveros E, Gómez-Garza G, Barragán-Mejía G, Broadway J et al (2008) Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs. Brain Cogn 68(2):117–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mirowsky JE, Dailey LA, Devlin RB (2016) Differential expression of pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress mediators induced by nitrogen dioxide and ozone in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Inhalation Toxicol 28(8):374–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fiorito G, Vlaanderen J, Polidoro S, Gulliver J, Galassi C, Ranzi A et al (2018) Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the effect of air pollution on cardio-and cerebrovascular disease: a prospective study in nonsmokers. Environ Mol Mutagen 59(3):234–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yokota S, Mizuo K, Moriya N, Oshio S, Sugawara I, Takeda K (2009) Effect of prenatal exposure to diesel exhaust on dopaminergic system in mice. Neurosci Lett 449(1):38–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suzuki T, Oshio S, Iwata M, Saburi H, Odagiri T, Udagawa T et al (2010) In utero exposure to a low concentration of diesel exhaust affects spontaneous locomotor activity and monoaminergic system in male mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 7(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jackson P, Vogel U, Wallin H, Hougaard KS (2011) Prenatal exposure to carbon black (printex 90): effects on sexual development and neurofunction. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 109(6):434–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the University of Phayao for financial support.

Funding

The authors received financial support from the University of Phayao.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nichapa Parasin: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft; Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen: methodology, conceptualization, and writing—review and editing; Surasak Saokaew: conceptualization and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

N/A.

Consent to participate

N/A.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Gregorio Milani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 145 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parasin, N., Amnuaylojaroen, T. & Saokaew, S. Exposure to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 and gross motor function in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 182, 1495–1504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04834-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04834-3

Keywords

Navigation