Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of procalcitonin as a biomarker for sepsis in pediatric burns

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infection and sepsis continue to be the leading cause of morbidity and death in burn injuries. Diagnosing sepsis in burns is challenging as signs and symptoms of sepsis are not specific and overlap with those related to the burn injury. While the use of procalcitonin (PCT) as a biomarker is recommended for diagnosing sepsis in burns, evidence for children with burns is scarce. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of PCT in distinguishing sepsis in pediatric burns. A prospective observational study was conducted in a single pediatric burn unit. Children hospitalized with burns ≤ 30% of total body surface area were included while patients with chemical burn, inhalation injury, or concomitant chronic diseases were excluded. Patients were classified into three groups for sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), or controls using the American Burn Association (ABA) criteria. The predictive role of C-reactive protein (CRP) and PCT was investigated for distinguishing sepsis. Seventy-two patients were included in the study. The median total body surface area (TBSA) size was 12% (2.0–28.5%), and the median abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) score was 3 (2–7). The median length of burn unit stay was 9.5 days (1–59 days). Sepsis was diagnosed in 11 patients (15.2%), and SIRS was present in 23 patients (40.0%), whereas 38 patients (52.8%) had neither SIRS nor sepsis (control group). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that CRP and PCT levels distinguished sepsis patients from non-sepsis patients while PCT had a higher positive predictive value (50.0% vs. 45.0%). Optimal cutoff values of CRP and PCT for distinguishing sepsis were 66.75 mg/L and 0.95 ng/mL.

Conclusions: PCT levels could distinguish sepsis in children with burn injuries, performing better than CRP levels. Confirmatory studies are needed to evaluate the development of sepsis and the role of PCT in diagnosing sepsis in pediatric burn patients.

What is Known:

• Even though there are excellent criteria for the diagnosis of infection and sepsis in children and several clinical parameters and biomarkers are being studied, it's difficult to diagnose burn wound sepsis in children.

What is New:

• Data from this study showed that procalcitonin levels performed better than CRP levels as a biomarker for distinguishing sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in children with burn injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data was generated at a central, large-scale facility and available upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ABA:

American Burn Association

ABSI:

Abbreviated burn severity index

ACCP/SCCM:

American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine

ANC:

Absolute neutrophil count

CRP:

C-reactive protein

PCT:

Procalcitonin

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SD:

Standard deviation

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

TBSA:

Total body surface area

WBC:

White blood cell count

References

  1. Krishnan P, Frew Q, Green A et al (2013) Cause of death and correlation with autopsy findings in burns patients. Burns 39:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelgren P, Björnhagen V, Bragderyd K et al (2002) A prospective study of infections in burn patients. Burns 28:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00070-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE et al (2006) Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenhalgh DG (2017) Sepsis in the burn patient: a different problem than sepsis in the general population. Burn Trauma 5:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0089-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez R, Rode H (2018) Role of procalcitonin in paediatric burn wound sepsis. S Afr Med J 108:793–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenhalgh DG, Saffle JR, Holmes JH et al (2007) American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns. J Burn Care Res 28:776–790. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181599bc9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollén L, Hughes R, Dodds N et al (2019) Use of procalcitonin as a biomarker for sepsis in moderate to major paediatric burns. Trauma 21:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Avni T, Levcovich A, Ad-El DD et al (2010) Prophylactic antibiotics for burns patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 340:c241. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c241

  9. Wibbenmeyer L, Danks R, Faucher L et al (2006) Prospective analysis of nosocomial infection rates, antibiotic use, and patterns of resistance in a burn population. J Burn Care Res Off Publ Am Burn Assoc 27:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000203359.32756.F7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zbyrak V, Reverón SL, Smoke S et al (2020) Antibiotic usage after procalcitonin-guided therapy algorithm implementation in a burn intensive care unit. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 33:317–321

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vijayan AL, Vanimaya RS et al (2017) Procalcitonin: a promising diagnostic marker for sepsis and antibiotic therapy. J Intensive Care 5:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0246-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cabral L, Afreixo V, Almeida L, Paiva JA (2016) The use of procalcitonin (PCT) for diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0168475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168475

  13. Tobiasen J, Hiebert JM, Edlich RF (1982) The abbreviated burn severity index. Ann Emerg Med 11:260–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80096-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A (2005) International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr Intensive Crit Care Soc 6:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB et al (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 101:1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duke J, Wood F, Semmens J et al (2011) A study of burn hospitalizations for children younger than 5 years of age: 1983–2008. Pediatrics 127:e971–e977. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geyik MF, Aldemir M, Hosoglu S, Tacyildiz HI (2003) Epidemiology of burn unit infections in children. Am J Infect Control 31:342–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(02)48226-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Santucci SG, Gobara S, Santos CR et al (2003) Infections in a burn intensive care unit: experience of seven years. J Hosp Infect 53:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2002.1340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozkan GY, Yucel T (2007) Burn, introduction, epidemiology, etiology. In: Turkiye Klin J Surg Med Sci, 3rd ed. pp 1–3

  20. Farina JAJ, Rosique MJ, Rosique RG (2013) Curbing inflammation in burn patients. Int J Inflam 2013:715645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715645

  21. Stanojcic M, Vinaik R, Jeschke MG (2018) Status and challenges of predicting and diagnosing sepsis in burn patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 19:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzwater J, Purdue GF, Hunt JL, O’Keefe GE (2003) The risk factors and time course of sepsis and organ dysfunction after burn trauma. J Trauma 54:959–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000029382.26295.AB

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berndtson AE, Sen S, Greenhalgh DG, Palmieri TL (2013) Estimating severity of burn in children: Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score versus Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI). Burns 39:1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bozkurt M, Öztürk S, Külahçı Y et al (2005) The role of procalcitonin levels at early diagnosis and follow up period in septic burn patients. Turkish J Plast Surg 13:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murray CK, Hoffmaster RM, Schmit DR et al (2007) Evaluation of white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, and elevated temperature as predictors of bloodstream infection in burn patients. Arch Surg 142:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.7.639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Von Heimburg D, Stieghorst W, Khorram-Sefat R, Pallua N (1998) Procalcitonin - a sepsis parameter in severe burn injuries. Burns 24:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00109-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Neely AN, Fowler LA, Kagan RJ, Warden GD (2004) Procalcitonin in pediatric burn patients: an early indicator of sepsis? J Burn Care Rehabil 25:76–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000105095.94766.89

  28. Bargues L, Chancerelle Y, Catineau J et al (2007) Evaluation of serum procalcitonin concentration in the ICU following severe burn. Burns 33:860–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lavrentieva A, Kontakiotis T, Lazaridis L et al (2007) Inflammatory markers in patients with severe burn injury. What is the best indicator of sepsis? Burns 33:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barati M, Alinejad F, Bahar MA et al (2008) Comparison of WBC, ESR, CRP and PCT serum levels in septic and non-septic burn cases. Burns 34:770–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2008.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bognar Z, Foldi V, Rezman B et al (2010) Extravascular lung water index as a sign of developing sepsis in burns. Burns 36:1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2010.04.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lavrentieva A, Papadopoulou S, Kioumis J et al (2012) PCT as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in burn patients. Whether time course has a role in monitoring sepsis treatment. Burns 38:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.08.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim HS, Yang HT, Hur J et al (2012) Procalcitonin levels within 48 hours after burn injury as a prognostic factor. Ann Clin Lab Sci 42:57–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cakır Madenci Ö, Yakupoğlu S, Benzonana N et al (2014) Evaluation of soluble CD14 subtype (presepsin) in burn sepsis. Burns 40:664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Seoane L, Pértega S, Galeiras R et al (2014) Procalcitonin in the burn unit and the diagnosis of infection. Burns 40:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paratz JD, Lipman J, Boots RJ et al (2014) A new marker of sepsis post burn injury?*. Crit Care Med 42:2029–2036. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mokline A, Garsallah L, Rahmani I et al (2015) Procalcitonin: a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of sepsis in burned patients. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 28:116–120

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosanova MT, Tramonti N, Taicz M et al (2015) Assessment of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to predict infection and mortality in burn children. Arch Argent Pediatr 113:36–41. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2015.36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kundes MF, Kement M (2019) Value of procalcitonin levels as a predictive biomarker for sepsis in pediatric patients with burn injuries. Niger J Clin Pract 22:881–884. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_311_18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brink C, Isaacs Q, Scriba MF et al (2019) Infant burns: a single institution retrospective review. Burns 45:1518–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: UO and ND. Performed the experiments: CAK and MD. Analyzed the data: UO and PK. Wrote the paper: UO. Reviewed the paper: ND.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ummuhan Oncul.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by the Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethical Committee (approval number: 449/ 03032015).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all study participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicole Ritz.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oncul, U., Dalgıç, N., Demir, M. et al. Use of procalcitonin as a biomarker for sepsis in pediatric burns. Eur J Pediatr 182, 1561–1567 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04831-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04831-6

Keywords

Navigation