Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

800 IU versus 400 IU per day of vitamin D3 in term breastfed infants: a randomized controlled trial from an LMIC

  • Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This open-label, block-randomized controlled trial compared the effect of 800 IU/day and 400 IU/day of oral vitamin D3 supplementation in reducing vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) among healthy-term breastfed infants at 14 weeks of postnatal age. All eligible infants were randomized to receive either 800 or 400 IU/day of oral vitamin D3 (starting within the first week until 14 weeks). The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with VDI (25-OH-D < 20 ng/ml) at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes were vitamin D deficiency (VDD, < 12 ng/ml), severe VDD (< 5 ng/ml), anthropometry, biochemical or clinical rickets, and any adverse events related to vitamin D toxicity (VDT). Among 102 enrolled infants, the distribution of baseline variables (including cord 25-OH-D levels; 13.0 versus 14.2 ng/ml) was similar in both groups. On intention-to-treat analysis, the proportions of infants with VDI at 14 weeks were significantly lower in the 800 IU group compared to those in the 400 IU group [24% versus 55%; RR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25–0.76]. The proportions of infants with elevated parathormone (6% versus 26.5%; p = 0.012) and severe VDD (0% versus 12.2%; p = 0.033) were significantly lower in the 800 IU group. Clinical rickets developed in three (6.2%) infants in the 400 IU group. No infant developed VDT.

     Conclusions: Daily oral supplementation with 800 IU of vitamin D3 resulted in an almost 50% reduction in the proportion of infants with VDI and prevented the occurrence of severe VDD at 14 weeks of age compared to 400 IU with no evidence of vitamin D toxicity.

     Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2019/02/017374).

What is Known:

• Breastfeeding is the ideal source of nutrition for healthy-term breastfed infants; however, vitamin D content of breastmilk is suboptimal.

• AAP recommends daily oral supplementation of 400 IU of vitamin D to all healthy-term breastfed infants; however, trials from high-income countries support insufficiency of this dose in maintaining serum 25-OH-D levels >20 ng/ml with no such information from low-middle-income countries.

What is New:

• 800 IU/day of oral vitamin D3 supplementation among term breastfed infants significantly reduces vitamin D insufficiency at 14 weeks’ age as compared to the recommended dose of 400 IU/day.

• This higher supplemental dose is safe with no evidence of vitamin D toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

CLIA:

Chemiluminescence immuno-assay

CI:

Confidence interval

DEXA:

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

GH:

Gestational hypertension

GDM:

Gestational diabetes mellitus

HICs:

High-income countries

IU:

International unit

LMIC:

Low-middle-income countries

Ng/ml:

Nanogram per milliliter

PTH:

Serum parathormone

RR:

Relative risk

25-OH-D:

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D

VDD:

Vitamin D deficiency

VDI:

Vitamin D insufficiency

VDT:

Vitamin D toxicity

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021) Infant and young child feeding. WHO, Geneva. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding (cited 29 Sept 2021)

  2. World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action (2021) WABA, Malaysia. Available from: https://waba.org.my/ (cited 29 Sep 2021)

  3. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC et al (2016) Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet Lond Engl 387(10017):475–90.

  4. Andiran N, Yordam N, Ozön A (2002) Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in breast-fed newborns and their mothers. Nutr Burbank Los Angel Cty Calif 18(1):47–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kovacs CS (2013) Maternal vitamin D deficiency: fetal and neonatal implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18(3):129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollis BW, Pittard WB (1984) Evaluation of the total fetomaternal vitamin D relationships at term: evidence for racial differences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59(4):652–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reeve LE, Chesney RW, DeLuca HF (1982) Vitamin D of human milk: identification of biologically active forms. Am J Clin Nutr 36(1):122–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballard O, Morrow AL (2013) Human milk composition: nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr Clin North Am 60(1):49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollis BW, Roos BA, Draper HH, Lambert PW (1981) Vitamin D and its metabolites in human and bovine milk. J Nutr 111(7):1240–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawodu A, Tsang RC (2012) Maternal vitamin D status: effect on milk vitamin D content and vitamin D status of breastfeeding infants. Adv Nutr 3(3):353–61

  11. Long M (2017) Sun Exposure. Pediatr Rev 38(9):446–7

  12. National Health Service (2020) Keeping your baby safe in the sun. NHS, UK. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/baby/first-aid-and-safety/safety/safety-in-the-sun/ (updated 10 Aug 2021; cited 29 Sep 2021)

  13. Holick MF (2004) Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr 79(3):362–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357(3):266–81

  15. Creo AL, Thacher TD, Pettifor JM, Strand MA, Fischer PR (2017) Nutritional rickets around the world: an update. Paediatr Int Child Health 37(2):84–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wharton B, Bishop N (2003) Rickets. Lancet Lond Engl 362(9393):1389–400

  17. Soliman A, Salama H, Alomar S, Shatla E, Ellithy K, Bedair E (2013) Clinical, biochemical, and radiological manifestations of vitamin D deficiency in newborns presented with hypocalcemia. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 17(4):697–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mailhot G, White JH (2020) Vitamin D and immunity in infants and children. Nutrients 12(5):1233

  19. Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, Jacques PF, Ingelsson E, Lanier K, Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Wolf M, Vasan RS (2008) Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 117(4):503–11

  20. Cantorna MT, Yu S, Bruce D (2008) The paradoxical effects of vitamin D on type 1 mediated immunity. Mol Aspects Med 29(6):369–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Focker M, Antel J, Grasemann C, Führer D, Timmesfeld N, Ozturk D et al (2018) Effect of vitamin D deficiency on depressive symptoms in child and adolescent psychiatric patients - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 18(1):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merewood A, Mehta SD, Grossman X, Chen TC, Mathieu J, Holick MF, Bauchner H (2012) Vitamin D status among 4- month-old infants in New England: a prospective cohort study. J Hum Lact 28(2):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salameh K, Al-Janahi NSA, Reedy AM, Dawodu A (2016) Prevalence and risk factors for low vitamin D status among breastfeeding mother-infant dyads in an environment with abundant sunshine. Int J Womens Health 8:529–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jain V, Gupta N, Kalaivani M, Jain A, Sinha A, Agarwal R (2011) Vitamin D deficiency in healthy breastfed term infants at 3 months & their mothers in India: seasonal variation & determinants. Indian J Med Res 133(3):267–273

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. National Institute of Health (2011) Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. In: Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB, editors. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/-NBK56070/ (Accessed 29 Sept 2021)

  26. World Health Organization (2017) Vitamin D supplementation for infants. WHO, Geneva. Available from: http://www.who.int/elena/tit-les/bbc/vitamind_infants/en/ (cited 27 Dec 2020)

  27. Wagner CL, Greer FR (2008) Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 122(5):1142–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Misra M, Pacaud D, Petryk A, Collett-Solberg PF, Kappy M (2008) Vitamin D deficiency in children and its management: review of current knowledge and recommendations. Pediatrics 122(2):398–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, Specker BL, Thacher TD, Ozono K, Michigami T, Tiosano D, Mughal MZ, Makitie O et al (2016) Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(2):394–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nutrition CO (1963) Committee on nutrition: the prophylactic requirement and the toxicity of vitamin D. Pediatrics 31(3):512–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arundel P, Ahmed SF, Allgrove J, Bishop NJ, Burren CP, Jacobs B, Mughal MZ, Offiah AC, Shaw NJ (2012) British Paediatric and Adolescent Bone Group’s position statement on vitamin D deficiency. BMJ 345:e8182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. European Food Safety Authority (2016) Panel on dietetics products, nutrition and allergies. Dietary reference values for vitamin D. EFSA, Italy 14(10):e04547 (updated 28 Oct 2016; cited 29 Sep 2021)

  33. Gallo S, Comeau K, Vanstone C, Agellon S, Sharma A, Jones G, Abbe ML, Khamessan A, Rodd C, Weiler H (2013) Effect of different dosages of oral vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status in healthy, breastfed infants: a randomized trial. JAMA 309(17):1785–1792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Holmlund-Suila E, Viljakainen H, Hytinantti T, Lamberg-Allardt C, Andersson S, Mäkitie O (2012) High-dose vitamin d intervention in infants- effects on vitamin d status, calcium homeostasis, and bone strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(11):4139–4147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziegler EE, Nelson SE, Jeter JM (2014) Vitamin D supplementation of breastfed infants: a randomized dose–response trial. Pediatr Res 76(2):177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Grant CC, Stewart AW, Scragg R, Milne T, Rowden J, Ekeroma A, Wall C, Mitchell EA, Crengle S, Trenholme A et al (2014) Vitamin D during pregnancy and infancy and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Pediatrics 133(1):e143-153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Priyadarshi M, Sankar MJ, Gupta N, Agarwal R, Paul V, Deorari A (2018) Efficacy of daily supplementation of 800 IU vitamin D on vitamin D status at 6 months of age in term healthy Indian infants. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc 38(11):1566–1572

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee JM, Smith JR, Philipp BL, Chen TC, Mathieu J, Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency in a healthy group of mothers and newborn infants. Clin Pediatr 46(1):42–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Pligt P, Willcox J, Szymlek-Gay EA, Murray E, Worsley A, Daly RM (2018) Associations of maternal vitamin D deficiency with pregnancy and neonatal complications in developing countries: a systematic review. Nutrients 10(5):640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fenton TR, Kim JH (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr 13:59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Holick MF (2003) The Parathyroid Hormone D-Lema. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(8):3499–3500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Atapattu N, Shaw N, Hogler W (2013) Relationship between serum 25- hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone in the search for a biochemical definition of vitamin D deficiency in children. Pediatr Res 74(5):552–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vasudevan J, Jenifer A, Reddy GMM, Thayumanavan S (2014) Serum alkaline phosphatase for screening of hypovitaminosis D. Indian Pediatr 51:60–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tan ML, Abrams SA, Osborn DA (2018) Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD013046

  45. Wegienka G, Kaur H, Sangha R, Cassidy-Bushrow AE (2016) Maternal-cord blood vitamin D correlations vary by maternal levels. Hindawi. J Pregnancy p. e7474192

  46. Siafarikas A, Piazena H, Feister U, Bulsara MK, Meffert H, Hesse V (2011) Randomised controlled trial analysing supplementation with 250 versus 500 units of vitamin D3, sun exposure and surrounding factors in breastfed infants. Arch Dis Child 96(1):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rothberg AD, Pettifor JM, Cohen DF, Sonnendecker EW, Ross FP (1982) Maternal-infant vitamin D relationships during breast-feeding. J Pediatr 101(4):500–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pilz S, März W, Cashman KD, Kiely ME, Whiting SJ, Holick MF, Grant WB, Pludowski P, Hiligsmann M, Trummer C et al (2018) Rationale and plan for vitamin D food fortification: a review and guidance paper. Front Endocrinol 9:373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Brandão-Lima PN, da Santos BC, Aguilera CM, Freire ARS, Martins-Filho PRS, Pires LV (2019) Vitamin D food fortification and nutritional status in children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 11(11):2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Roth DE, Abrams SA, Aloia J, Bergeron G, Bourassa MW, Brown KH, Calvo MS, Cashman KD, Combs G, De-Regil LM et al (2018) Global prevalence and disease burden of vitamin D deficiency: a roadmap for action in low- and middle-income countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1430(1):44–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Barrett KE, Barman SM, Boitano S, Brooks HL (eds) (2012) Hormonal control of calcium, phosphate metabolism and the physiology of bone. In: Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 24th ed. CA: McGraw-Hill pp. 377–87

  52. Chacham S, Rajput S, Gurnurkar S, Mirza A, Saxena V, Dakshinamurthy S, Chaturvedi J, Goyal JP, Chegondi M (2020) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among infants in Northern India: a hospital based prospective study. Cureus 12(11):e1353

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lu M, Hollis BW, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Singh RJ, Weiss ST et al (2020) Determinants and measurement of neonatal vitamin D: overestimation of 25(OH)D in cord blood using CLIA assay technology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(4):e1085–e1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was available; however, the cost of the investigations was bore by the institute and the drug was supplied in-kind contribution by Cipla, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bharti Yadav: conceptualized and designed the study (with NG), recruited patients, compiled the data, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Neeraj Gupta: planned the study, supervised the collection, analyzed and interpreted the data, did critical revision and finalization of the manuscript. Rohit Sasidharan: conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated the sample collection, followed up these patients, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. Sivam Thanigainathan: participated in data analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. Purvi Purohit: participated in study design, processed the biochemical samples of bone mineral panel, vitamin D, and serum PTH. Kuldeep Singh: supervised the design of study, generated the randomization sequence, and critically revised the manuscript. Praveen Sharma: supervised the processing of biochemical samples, analyzed the results, and did critical revision of the manuscript. Arun Singh: participated in data analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. NG is the guarantor of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeraj Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The supplier of the drug or its representative has no role in the study design, conduct, analysis, and manuscript preparation.

Clinical trial registry name and number

The study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2019/02/017374.

Ethical clearance

The Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, approved the study protocol.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniele De Luca

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, B., Gupta, N., Sasidharan, R. et al. 800 IU versus 400 IU per day of vitamin D3 in term breastfed infants: a randomized controlled trial from an LMIC. Eur J Pediatr 181, 3473–3482 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04533-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04533-5

Keywords

Navigation