Abstract
In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of mHealth apps. Nevertheless, there are no scoping reviews that analyze the scientific peer-reviewed articles of these tools. This research systematically reviews the scientific literature published on health apps targeting children in peer-reviewed journals. It aims to answer four questions: what is the primary purpose of these apps; for what medical specialties and main topics were they developed; whom do they target; and how they were analyzed. The study followed PRISMA methodology, and the search process used the Web of Science Core Collection. The selected terms for the search were “pediatr*” and “app.” The initial search resulted in 303 papers which, after applying filters, excluded 187 papers. In the end, 116 articles were deemed appropriate for addressing our research questions and were thoroughly reviewed. The primary purpose of pediatric health apps is to support clinical decision-making, patient education, and patient self-management. The most frequent topics covered are cancer, obesity, and asthma. Hematological oncology and endocrinology are the most frequent medical specialties addressed. The apps mainly target children, their caregivers, or both groups. Most of the apps were analyzed using observational studies, predominantly conducted in the USA, with an average participant sample size of 842. No analyses of development costs were found. These findings can be helpful for the development of future pediatric health apps.
What is Known: • Health care has become increasingly digital due to digital health technologies, which have helped to expand the scope of health care. • Digital health technology can be used to improve the health of children. • The increasing availability of smartphones for children and families may enable the use of apps to deliver, promote, and sustain interventions which could lead to long-term improvements in health. | |
What is New: • The most frequent topics covered were cancer, obesity, and asthma. Hematology-oncology and endocrinology were the most frequent medical specialties addressed. • The principal aims of the pediatric health apps were to facilitate clinical decision support, patient education, and patient self-management. • The apps mainly targeted children, their caregivers, or both groups. • Most of them had been analyzed using observational studies. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data extracted from included studies.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Milne-Ives M, Lam C, Van Velthoven MH, Meinert E (2020) Mobile apps for health behavior change: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR research protocols 9(1):e16931. https://doi.org/10.2196/16931
Cheng L, Duan M, Mao X, Ge Y, Wang Y, Huang H (2020) The effect of digital health technologies on managing symptoms across pediatric cancer continuum: a systematic review. Int J Nur Sci 8(1):22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.10.002
Milne-Ives M, Lam C, De Cock C, Van Velthoven MH, Meinert E (2020) Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(3):e17046. https://doi.org/10.2196/17046
McCann L, McMillan KA, Pugh G (2019) Digital interventions to support adolescents and young adults with cancer: systematic review. JMIR Cancer 5(2):e12071. https://doi.org/10.2196/12071
Rashid R, Perego P, Condon L, Jakobsen JC, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Lissau I (2020) Health apps targeting children with overweight—a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of randomised clinical trials. Systematic reviews. 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1269-0
Jazayeri SMHM, Jamshidnezhad A (2019) Top mobile applications in pediatrics and children’s health: assessment and intelligent analysis tools for a systematic investigation. Malay J Med Sci 26(1):5. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.1.2
Lau N, O’Daffer A, Colt S, Joyce P, Palermo TM, McCauley E, Rosenberg AR (2020) Android and iPhone mobile apps for psychosocial wellness and stress management: systematic search in app stores and literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8(5):e17798. https://doi.org/10.2196/17798
Van Velthoven MH, Smith J, Wells G, Brindley D (2018) Digital health app development standards: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 8(8):e022969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022969
Cunningham A, McPolin O, Fallis R, Coyle C, Best P, McKenna G (2021) A systematic review of the use of virtual reality or dental smartphone applications as interventions for management of paediatric dental anxiety. BMC Oral Health 21(1):1–11
Richardson B, Dol J, Rutledge K, Monaghan J, Orovec A, Howie K, Campbell-Yeo M (2019) Evaluation of mobile apps targeted to parents of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: systematic app review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7(4):e11620
Burke BL, Hall RW (2015) Telemedicine: pediatric applications. Pediatrics 136(1):e293–e308. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1517
Rossi PG, Ferrari F, Amarri S, Bassi A, Bonvicini L, Dall’Aglio L (2020) Childhood Obesity Prevention Working Group. Describing the process and tools adopted to cocreate a smartphone app for obesity prevention in childhood: mixed method study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(6):e16165. https://doi.org/10.2196/16165
Villera Pérez YI, Medlow S, Ho J, Steinbeck K (2019) Mobile and web-based apps that support self-management and transition in young people with chronic illness: systematic review. JMIR 21(11):e13579
Van Velthoven MH, Milne-Ives M, de Cock C, Mooney M, Meinert E (2020) Use of apps to promote childhood vaccination: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR research protocols 9(2):e16929
de Cock C, van Velthoven M, Milne-Ives M, Mooney M, Meinert E (2020) Use of apps to promote childhood vaccination: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(5):e17371
Langarizadeh M, Sadeghi M, As’habi A, Rahmati P, Sheikhtaheri A (2021) Mobile apps for weight management in children and adolescents; an updated systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling
Badawy SM, Barrera L, Sinn MG, Kaviany S, O’Dwyer LC, Kuhns LM (2017) Text messaging and mobile phone apps as interventions to improve adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 5(5):e7798
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, McKenzie JEPRISMA (2020) explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021:372
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Internal Med 169:467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 354:1896–1900
Analytics Clarivate. Web of Science core collection. Citation database. Web of Science. 2017
Jacso P (2018) The scientometric portrait of Eugene Garfield through the free ResearcherID service from the Web of Science Core Collection of 67 million master records and 1.3 billion references. Scientometrics 114(2):545–555
de Dios FJG, Álvarez JCB, Rodrigo MA (2011) Listas guía de comprobación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: declaración PRISMA. Evidencias en pediatría 7(4):20
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Prisma Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6(7):e1000097
Iribarren SJ, Akande TO, Kamp KJ, Barry D, Kader YG, Suelzer E (2021) Effectiveness of mobile apps to promote health and manage disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9(1):e21563
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Nievas, Ruiz, and Uribe; methodology, Nievas; validation, Uribe and Ruiz; writing—original draft preparation, Nievas, Uribe, Ruiz; writing—review and editing, Parron. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Gregorio Paolo Milani
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nievas Soriano, B.J., Uribe-Toril, J., Ruiz-Real, J.L. et al. Pediatric apps: what are they for? A scoping review. Eur J Pediatr 181, 1321–1327 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04351-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04351-1