Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to: Clinical utility of the pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index

  • Reply
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correspondence to this article was published on 23 May 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Yildizdas D, Yontem A, Iplik G, Horoz OO, Ekinci F (2021) Predicting nasal high-flow therapy failure by pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index and pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index variation in children. Eur J Pediatr 180:1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03847-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Olupot-Olupot P, Hamaluba M, Thomas K, Alaroker F, Opoka RO, Tagoola A, Bandika V, Mpoya A, Mnjella H, Nabawanuka E, Okiror W, Nakuya M, Aromut D, Engoru C, Oguda E, Williams TN, Fraser JF, Harrison DA, Rowan K; COAST trial group (2021) Randomised controlled trial of oxygen therapy and high-flow nasal therapy in African children with pneumonia. Intensive care medicine, 1–11. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06385-3

  3. Liu C, Cheng WY, Li JS, Tang T, Tan PL, Yang L (2020) High-flow nasal cannula vs. continuous positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of children <2 years with mild to moderate respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Front Pediatr 8:590906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.590906

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang C-C, Lin Y-C, Chen T-C, Lin J-J, Hsia S-H, Chan O-W, Lee E-P (2021) High-flow nasal cannula therapy in children with acute respiratory distress with hypoxia in a pediatric intensive care unit–a single center experience. Front Pediatr 9:664180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.664180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors equally contributed to the writing of this correspondence.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Yontem.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No ethical approval is required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yildizdas, D., Yontem, A., Horoz, O.O. et al. Reply to: Clinical utility of the pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index. Eur J Pediatr 180, 3421–3422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04127-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04127-7

Navigation