Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The healthcare needs of preterm and extremely premature babies in Australia—assessing the long-term health service use and costs with a data linkage cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The health conditions associated with extreme prematurity will likely require life-long treatment and management. As such, planning for the provision of healthcare services is essential in order to maximise their long-term well-being. We sought to quantify the use of healthcare services and the associated costs for extremely premature babies compared to preterm and term babies in Australia using a whole-of-population linked administrative dataset. In the first year of life, extremely premature babies had an average of 3.4 hospital admissions, and 2 emergency department presentations. They also had an average of 16 specialist attendances, 33 pathology tests and 6 diagnostic imaging tests performed. This was more than that utilised by preterm and full-term babies. The mean annual cost of hospitalisations was $182,312 for extremely premature babies in the first year and $9958 in the second year. The mean annual out-of-pocket fees for these services were $2212 and $121 in the first and second years respectively.

Conclusion: Understanding the long-term healthcare needs of extremely premature babies in order to provide both an adequate number of services and also connection between services should be a central part of health system planning as the survival rates of extremely premature babies improve over time.

What is Known:

The health service use of extremely premature babies is higher at the time of birth.

Health conditions and disabilities associated with extreme prematurity require life-long care.

What is New:

Extremely premature babies have more diverse and frequent access to services than premature and term babies until at least age 2.

This comes at higher cost to families through out-of-pocket payments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Our ethics approvals prohibit the sharing of data.

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive care unit

MBS:

Medicare Benefits Schedule

References

  1. Patel RM, Rysavy MA, Bell EF, Tyson JE (2017) Survival of infants born at periviable gestational ages. Clin Perinatol 44(2):287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M (2005) Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 352(1):9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hornik CP, Sherwood AL, Cotten CM, Laughon MM, Clark RH, Smith PB (2016) Daily mortality of infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation. Early Hum Dev 96:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saigal S, Doyle LW (2008) An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 371(9608):261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle LW, Ford G, Davis N (2003) Health and hospitalisations after discharge in extremely low birth weight infants. Semin Neonatol 8(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Brooks-Gunn J, Peckham G (1993) Hospitalization of very low birth weight children at school age. J Pediatr 122(3):360–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Escobar GJ, Joffe S, Gardner MN, Armstrong MA, Folck BF, Carpenter DM (1999) Rehospitalization in the first two weeks after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 104(1):e2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson K, Schollin J, Bodin L, Ternestedt BM (2001) Utilization of healthcare by very-low-birthweight infants during their first year of life. Acta Paediatr 90(2):213–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farooqi A, Hägglöf B, Sedin G, Gothefors L, Serenius F (2006) Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs in 10-to 12-year-old children born at 23 to 25 weeks’ gestation in the 1990s: a Swedish national prospective follow-up study. Pediatrics. 118(5):e1466–e1e77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Younge N, Goldstein RF, Bann CM, Hintz SR, Patel RM, Smith PB et al (2017) Survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes among periviable infants. N Engl J Med 376(7):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierrat V, Marchand-Martin L, Arnaud C, Kaminski M, Resche-Rigon M, Lebeaux C et al (2017) Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. Br Med J j3448:358

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callander EJ, Fox H (2018) What are the costs associated with child and maternal healthcare within Australia? A study protocol for the use of data linkage to identify health service use, and health system and patient costs. BMJ Open 8(2):e017816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Record—Department of Health Broad Type of Service (BTOS) hierarchy, code NNNN Canberra: AIHW; 2019 [updated unknown; cited 2020 January]. Available from: https://meteor.aihw.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/604330.

  14. Janvier A, Barrington K, Farlow B (2014) Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology. Semin Perinatol 38(1):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu K, Evans DB, Carrin G, Aguilar-Rivera AM, Musgrove P, Evans T (2007) Protecting households from catastrophic health spending. Health Aff 26(4):972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duckett S, Willcox S (2015) The Australian Health Care System. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Dorling JS, Field DJ (2007) Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch Dis Childhood-Fetal Neonatal Edit 92(1):F11–FF4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caughey AB, Burchfield DJ (2014) Costs and cost-effectiveness of periviable care. Semin Perinatol 38(1):56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Biasini A, Fantini F, Neri E, Stella M, Arcangeli T (2012) Communication in the neonatal intensive care unit: a continuous challenge. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 25(10):2126–2129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cummings JJP (2015) Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation 136(3):588–595

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH (2013) Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health Aff 32(3):516–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dalziel K, Li J, Scott A, Clarke P (2018) Accuracy of patient recall for self-reported doctor visits: is shorter recall better? Health Econ 27(11):1684–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Callander EJ, Allele F, Roberts H, Guinea W, Lindsay D (2019) The effect of childhood ADD/ADHD on parental workforce participation. J Atten Disord 23(5):487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Callander EJ, Lindsay D (2018) The impact of childhood autism spectrum disorder on parent’s labour force participation: can parents be expected to be able to re-join the labour force? Autism. 22(5):542–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Queensland Health Statistical Service Branch and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for conducting the data linkage for this study.

Code availability

Code is available upon request.

Funding

EC received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council under the Career Development Fellowship scheme (APP1159536).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EC conceived the study, undertook the analysis and drafted the manuscript. EC and KA co-designed the analysis, interpreted the results and edited the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily J. Callander.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethics approval for the use of the Maternity1000 dataset was obtained from the Townsville Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (HREC/16/QTHS/223), James Cook University HREC (H7246) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare HREC (EO2017-1-338). We also received Public Health Act Approval (RD007377) to waive consent for data collection.

Consent to participate

N/A.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniele De Luca

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Broad Type of Service category examples

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callander, E.J., Atwell, K. The healthcare needs of preterm and extremely premature babies in Australia—assessing the long-term health service use and costs with a data linkage cohort study. Eur J Pediatr 180, 2229–2236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04009-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-04009-y

Keywords

Navigation